A nested logit model of recreational fishing demand in Alaska

Marine Resource Economics

Volumn 24, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 101-129

  Carson, Richard T ^a   Hanemann, W Michael ^b   Wegge, Thomas C ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c TCW Economics   (United States)

Author keywords

Bioeconomic modeling; Travel cost analysis

Indexed keywords

EID: 69049100014     PISSN: 07381360     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1086/mre.24.2.42731375     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (34)

1. Berry, S.T. 1994. Estimating Discrete Choice Models of Product Differentiation. Rand Journal of Economics 25:242-262
2. Binkley, C.S., and W.M. Hanemann. 1978. The Recreation Benefits of Water Quality Improvement: Analysis of Day Trips in an Urban Setting. Report No. EPA-600/5-78-010. Washington, DC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
3. Bockstael, N.E., W.M. Hanemann, and C.L. Kling. 1986. Estimating the Value of Water Quality Improvements in a Recreational Demand Framework. Water Resources Research 23:951-960
4. Bockstael, N.E., W.M. Hanemann, and I. Strand. 1986. Measuring the Benefits of Water Quality Improvements Using Recreation Demand Models. Washington, DC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
5. Bockstael, N.E., I.E. Strand, and W.M. Hanemann. 1987. Time and the Recreational Demand Model. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 69:293-302.
6. Brown, G.M., and R. Mendelsohn. 1984. The Hedonic Travel Cost Method. Review of Economics and Statistics 66:427-433
7. Burt, O.R., and D. Brewer. 1971. Estimation of Net Social Benefits from Outdoor Recreation. Econometrica 39:813-827
8. Cardell, S. 1997. Variance Component Structures for Extreme Value and Logistic Distributions with Models of Heterogeneity. Econometric Theory 13:185-213.
9. Carson, R.T., W.M. Hanemann, and D. Steinberg. 1990. A Discrete Choice Contingent Valuation Estimate of the Value of Kenai King Salmon. Journal of Behavioral Economics 19:53-68.
10. Carson, R.T., R.C. Mitchell, W.M. Hanemann, R.J. Kopp, S. Presser, and P.A. Ruud. 1992. A Contingent Valuation Study of Lost Passive Use Values Resulting from the Exxon Valdez Oil Spill. A Report to the Attorney General of the State of Alaska. November 10.
11. Clawson, M., and J.K. Knetsch. 1966. Economics of Outdoor Recreation. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
12. Dwyer, J.F., J.R. Kelly, and M.D. Bowes. 1977. Improved Procedures for Valuation of the Contribution of Recreation to National Economic Development. Water Resources Center Report 128, Urbana, IL: University of Illinois.
13. Freeman, A.M. 1995. The Benefits of Water Quality for Marine Recreation: A Review of the Empirical Evidence. Marine Resource Economics 10:385-406.
14. Grogger, J.T., and R.T. Carson. 1991. Models for Truncated Counts. Journal of Applied Econometrics 6:225-238
15. Gum, R.L., and W.E. Martin. 1975. Problems and Solutions in Estimating the Demand for and Value of Outdoor Recreation. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 57:558-566
16. Hagerty, D., and K. Moeltner. 2005. Specification of Driving Costs in Models of Recreation Demand. Land Economics 81:127-143
17. Hanemann, W.M. 1978. A Methodological and Empirical Study of the Recreation Benefits from Water Quality Improvement. Ph.D. Dissertation, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA.
18. -. 1984a. Discrete/Continuous Models of Consumer Demand. Econometrica 52:541-61.
19. Hanemann W.M. 1984b. Welfare Evaluation in Contingent Valuation Experiments with Discrete Responses. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 66:332-341
20. Hanemann W.M. 1985. Applied Welfare Analysis with Discrete Choice Models. Working Paper, University of California, Berkeley, Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics.
21. Jones & Stokes. 1987. Southcentral Alaska Area Sport Fishing Economic Study. Final Report to the Alaska Department of Fish and Game. Sacramento, CA: Jones & Stokes Associates.
22. Jones & Stokes. 1991. Southeast Alaska Sport Fishing Economic Study. Final Research Report. Sacramento, CA: Jones & Stokes Associates.
23. Kaoru, Y., V.K. Smith, and J.L. Liu. 1995. Using Random Utility Models to Estimate the Value of Estuarine Resources. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 77:141-151
24. Mendelsohn, R.O. 1985. Modeling the Demand for Recreation. Paper presented at Association of Environmental and Resource Economists' Workshop on Recreation Demand Modeling, Boulder, CO.
25. Morey, E.R. 1981. The Demand for Site-Specific Recreational Activities: A Characteristics Approach. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 8:245-271
26. Morey, E.R., W.D. Shaw, and R.D. Rowe. 1991. A Discrete Choice Model of Recreational Participation, Site Choice and Activity Valuation when Complete Trips are not Available. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 20:181-201.
27. Provencher, B., and R.C. Bishop. 1997. An Estimable Dynamic Model of Recreational Behavior with an Application to Great Lakes Angling. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 33:107-127
28. Rowe, R.D., E.R. Morey, A.D. Ross, and W.D. Shaw. 1985. Valuing Marine Recreational Fishing on the Pacific Coast. Report prepared for the National Marine Fisheries Service, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.
29. Smith, V.K., and Y. Kaoru. 1987. The Hedonic Travel Cost Model: A View from the Trenches. Land Economics 63:179-192
30. Smith, V.K., and R.J. Kopp. 1980. Spatial Limits of the Travel Cost Recreational Demand Model. Land Economics 56:64-72.
31. Train, K.E. 1998. Recreational Demand Models with Taste Differences over People. Land Economics 74:230-239
32. Vaughan, W.J., and C.S. Russell (with C. Paulsen and R. Carson). 1982a. Fresh Water Recreational Fishing: The National Benefits of Water Pollution Control. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future.
33. Vaughan, W.J., and C.S. Russell (with C. Paulsen and R. Carson). 1982b. Valuing a Fishing Day: An Application of a Systematic Varying Parameters Model. Land Economics 58: 450-463
34. Wegge, T.C., W.M. Hanemann, and I.E. Strand. 1986. An Economic Assessment of Marine Recreational Fishing in Southern California. Report to the National Marine Fisheries Service. Sacramento, CA: Jones & Stokes Associates.