Examining the Effects of Mass Media Campaign Exposure and Interpersonal Discussions on Youth's Drug Use: The Mediating Role of Visiting Pro-Drug Websites

Health Communication

Volumn 28, Issue 5, 2013, Pages 473-485

  Kam, Jennifer A ^a   Lee, Chul joo ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADDICTION; ADOLESCENT; ARTICLE; FEMALE; HEALTH PROMOTION; HUMAN; HUMAN RELATION; INTERNET; MALE; MASS MEDIUM; QUESTIONNAIRE;

ADOLESCENT; FEMALE; HEALTH PROMOTION; HUMANS; INTERNET; INTERPERSONAL RELATIONS; MALE; MASS MEDIA; QUESTIONNAIRES; SUBSTANCE-RELATED DISORDERS;

EID: 84880951315     PISSN: 10410236     EISSN: 15327027     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10410236.2012.699873     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Balka, E., Krueger, G., Holmes, B. J. and Stephen, J. E. 2010. Situating Internet use: Information-seeking among young women with breast cancer. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 15: 389 - 411.
2. Belenko, S., Dugosh, K. L., Lynch, D., Mericle, A. A., Pich, M. and Forman, R. F. 2009. " Online illegal drug use information: An exploratory analysis of drug-related website viewing by adolescents ". In Journal of Health Communication, 14 612 - 630.
3. Bollen, K. and Lennox, R. 1991. Conventional wisdom on measurement: A structural equation perspective. Psychological Bulletin, 110: 305 - 314.
4. Borzekowski, D. L. 2006. Adolescents' use of the Internet: A controversial, coming-of-age resource. Adolescent Medicine Clinics, 17: 205 - 216.
5. Borzekowski, D. L. and Rickert, V. I. 2001. Adolescent cyber-surfing for health information: A new resource that crosses barriers. Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine, 155: 813 - 817.
6. Boyer, E. W., Shannon, M. and Hibberd, P. L. 2005. The Internet and psychoactive substance use among innovative drug users. Pediatrics, 115: 302 - 305.
7. Brashers, D. E., Goldsmith, D. J. and Hsieh, E. 2002. Information seeking and avoiding in health contexts. Human Communication Research, 28: 258 - 272.
8. Chen, X., Unger, J. B., Palmer, P., Weiner, M. D., Johnson, C. A., Wong, M. M. and Austin, G. 2002. Prior cigarette smoking initiation predicting current alcohol use: Evidence for a gateway drug effect among California adolescents from eleven ethnic groups. Addictive Behaviors, 27: 799 - 817.
9. Cho, J., Shah, D. V., McLeod, J. M., McLeod, D. M., Scholl, R. M. and Gotlieb, M. R. 2009. Campaigns, reflection, and deliberation: Advancing an O-R-O-R model of communication effects. Communication Theory, 19: 66 - 88.
10. Cohen, J. 1988. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences, 2nd, Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
11. Collins, L. M. and Graham, J. W. 2002. The effect of the timing and spacing of observations in longitudinal studies of tobacco and other drug use: Temporal design considerations. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 68: S85 - S96.
12. David, C., Cappella, J. N. and Fishbein, M. 2006. The social diffusion of influence among adolescents: Group interaction in a chat room environment about antidrug advertisements. Communication Theory, 16: 118 - 140.
13. Dunlop, S. M., Kashima, Y. and Wakefield, M. 2010. Predictors and consequences of conversations about health promoting media messages. Communication Monographs, 77: 518 - 539.
14. Ennett, S. T., Bauman, K. E., Foshee, V. A., Pemberton, M. and Hicks, K. A. 2001. Parent-child communication about adolescent tobacco and alcohol use: What do parents say and does it affect youth behavior?. Journal of Marriage and Family, 63: 48 - 62.
15. Gordon, S. M., Forman, R. F. and Siatkowski, C. 2006. Knowledge and use of the Internet as a source of controlled substances. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 30: 271 - 274.
16. Graham, J. W. 2009. Missing data analysis: Making it work in the real world. Annual Review of Psychology, 60: 549 - 576.
17. Hafstad, A. and Aaro, L. E. 1997. Activating interpersonal influence through provocative appeals: Evaluation of a mass media-based antismoking campaign targeting adolescents. Health Communication, 9: 253 - 272.
18. Hayes, A. F. 2009. Beyond Baron and Kenny: Statistical mediation analysis in the new millennium. Communication Monographs, 76: 408 - 420.
19. Hoeken, H., Swanepoel, P., Saal, E. and Jansen, C. 2009. Using message form to stimulate conversations: The case of tropes. Communication Theory, 19: 49 - 65.
20. Holbert, R. L. and Benoit, W. L. 2009. A theory of political campaign media connections. Communication Monographs, 76: 303 - 332.
21. Hornik, R. C., Jacobsohn, L., Orwin, R., Piesse, A. and Kalton, G. 2008. Effects of the National Youth Anti-Drug Media Campaign on youths. American Journal of Public Health, 98: 2229 - 2236.
22. Hu, L. and Bentler, P. M. 1999. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6: 1 - 55.
23. Hwang, Y. 2012. Social diffusion of campaign effects: Campaign-generated interpersonal communication as a mediator of antitobacco campaign effects. Communication Research, 39: 120 - 141.
24. Kam, J. A. 2011. Identifying changes in youth's subgroup membership over time based on their targeted communication about substance use with parents and friends. Human Communication Research, 26: 111 - 124.
25. Lee, C.-J. The role of social capital in health communication campaigns: The case of the Anti-Drug Media Campaign. Communication Research, 2012doi: 10.1177/0093650212446332
26. Lee, C.-J. 2010. The interplay between media use and interpersonal communication in the context of healthy lifestyle behaviors: Reinforcing or substituting?. Mass Communication & Society, 13: 48 - 66.
27. Levy, J. A. and Strombeck, R. 2002. Health benefits and risks of the Internet. Journal of Medical Systems, 26: 495 - 510.
28. Lin, C. A. and Hullman, G. A. 2005. Tobacco-prevention messages online: Social marketing via the web. Health Communication, 18: 177 - 193.
29. MacKinnon, D. P., Fritz, M. S., Williams, J. and Lockwood, C. M. 2007. Distribution of the product confidence limits for the indirect effect: Program PRODCLIN. Behavior Research Methods, 39: 384 - 389.
30. Miller-Day, M. and Kam, J. A. 2010. More than just openness: Developing and validating a measure of targeted parent-child communication about alcohol. Health Communication, 25: 293 - 302.
31. Muthén, L. K. and Muthén, B. O. 2007. Mplus user's guide, 5th, Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.
32. Nagler, R. H., Romantan, A., Kelly, B. J., Stevens, R. S., Gray, S. W., Hull, S. J. and Hornik, R. C. 2010. How do cancer patients navigate the public information environment? Understanding patterns and motivations for movement among information sources. Journal of Cancer Education, 25: 360 - 370.
33. Oetting, E. R., Donnermeyer, J. F. and Deffenbacher, J. L. 1998. Primary socialization theory: The influence of the community on drug use and deviance. III. Substance Use and Misuse, 33: 1629 - 1665.
34. Prentice, D. A. and Miller, D. T. 1992. When small effects are impressive. Psychological Bulletin, 112: 160 - 164.
35. Real, K. and Rimal, R. N. 2007. Friends talk to friends about drinking: Exploring the role of peer communication in the theory of normative social behavior. Health Communication, 22: 169 - 180.
36. Reid-Quiñones, K. 2011. Parent-child communication about substance use: Experiences of Latino emerging adults, Richmond, VA: Unpublished dissertation, Virginia Commonwealth University.
37. Ribisl, K. M. 2003. The potential of the Internet as a medium to encourage and discourage youth tobacco use. Tobacco Control, 12: 8 - 11.
38. Rimal, R. N. and Real, D. 2003. Understanding the influence of perceived norms on behaviors. Communication Theory, 13: 184 - 203.
39. Schumacker, R. E. and Lomax, R. G. 2010. A beginner's guide to structural equation modeling, 3rd, New York, NY: Routledge.
40. Schwinn, T. M., Schinke, S. P. and Di Noia, J. 2010. Preventing drug abuse among adolescent girls: Outcome data from an Internet-based intervention. Prevention Science, 11: 24 - 32.
41. Slater, M. D. and Hayes, A. F. 2010. The influence of youth music television viewership on changes in cigarette use and association with smoking peers: A social development, reinforcing spirals perspective. Communication Research, 37: 751 - 773.
42. Southwell, B. G. and Torres, A. 2006. Connecting interpersonal and mass communication: Science news exposure, perceived ability to understand science, and conversation. Communication Monographs, 73: 334 - 350.
43. Southwell, B. G. and Yzer, M. C. 2007. The roles of interpersonal communication in mass media campaigns. Communication Yearbook, 31: 419 - 462.
44. Stephenson, M. T. and Quick, B. L. 2005. Parent ads in the national youth anti-drug media campaign. Journal of Health Communication, 10: 701 - 710.
45. Tan, A. S. 1980. Mass media use, issue knowledge and political involvement. Public Opinion Quarterly, 44: 241 - 248.
46. Torabi, M. R., Bailey, W. J. and Majd-Jabbari, M. 1993. Cigarette smoking as a predictor of alcohol and other drug use by children and adolescents: Evidence of the "gateway drug effect.". Journal of School Health, 63: 302 - 306.
47. Valente, T. W., Ritt-Olson, A., Stacy, A., Unger, J. B., Okamoto, J. and Sussman, S. 2007. Peer acceleration: Effects of a social network tailored substance use prevention program among high-risk adolescents. Addiction, 102: 1804 - 1815.
48. van den Putte, B., Yzer, M., Southwell, B. G., de Bruijn, G.-J. and Willemsen, M. C. 2011. Interpersonal communication as an indirect pathway for the effect of antismoking media content on smoking cessation. Journal of Health Communication, 16: 470 - 485.
49. Vodanovich, S., Sundaram, D. and Myers, M. 2010. Digital natives and ubiquitous information. Information Systems Research, 21: 711 - 723.
50. Wax, P. M. 2002. Just a click away: Recreational drug web sites on the Internet. Pediatrics, 109: e96
51. Weinstein, N. D. 1989. Optimistic biases about personal risks. Science, 246: 1232 - 1233.