메뉴 건너뛰기
American Journal of Roentgenology
Volumn 200, Issue 6, 2013, Pages 1179-1180
AJR Reviewers: We need to continue to improve our education and monitoring methods!

(1)  Berquist, Thomas H a  

a NONE
Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]
Indexed keywords

CLASSIFICATION; CONSENSUS DEVELOPMENT; EDITOR; EDITORIAL; INFORMATION PROCESSING; MEDICAL EDUCATION; MEDICAL LITERATURE; MEDICAL SPECIALIST; MONITORING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROFESSIONAL COMPETENCE; PUBLISHING; RADIOLOGY; RATING SCALE; WORKSHOP; HUMAN; PEER REVIEW; PUBLICATION; STANDARD;
EID: 84880946148     PISSN: 0361803X     EISSN: 15463141     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2214/AJR.13.10792     Document Type: Editorial
Times cited : (8)
References (8)
  • 1
    • 55549092416 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Publication in AJR: Critical interactions among authors, reviewers and editors
    • Berquist TH. Publication in AJR: critical interactions among authors, reviewers and editors. AJR 2008; 191:1291-1292
    • (2008) AJR , vol.191 , pp. 1291-1292
    • Berquist, T.H.1
  • 2
    • 84856092177 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Editors and reviewers: Roles and responsibilities
    • Berquist TH. Editors and reviewers: roles and responsibilities. AJR 2012; 198:245
    • (2012) AJR , vol.198 , pp. 245
    • Berquist, T.H.1
  • 3
    • 84864742294 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Peer review: Is the process broken?
    • Berquist HT. Peer review: is the process broken? AJR 2012; 199:243
    • (2012) AJR , vol.199 , pp. 243
    • Berquist, H.T.1
  • 4
    • 70449482192 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Peer review and biomedical publications: We all have the same issues
    • Berquist TH. Peer review and biomedical publications: we all have the same issues. AJR 2009; 193:1199-1200
    • (2009) AJR , vol.193 , pp. 1199-1200
    • Berquist, T.H.1
  • 5
    • 0032527530 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Reliability of editors' subjective quality ratings of peer reviews of manuscripts
    • Callaham ML, Baxt WG, Waeckerle JF, Wears RL. Reliability of editors' subjective quality ratings of peer reviews of manuscripts. JAMA 1998; 280:229-231
    • (1998) JAMA , vol.280 , pp. 229-231
    • Callaham, M.L.1    Baxt, W.G.2    Waeckerle, J.F.3    Wears, R.L.4
  • 6
    • 29844444319 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • A systematic guide to reviewing a manuscript
    • Provenzale JM, Stanley RJ. A systematic guide to reviewing a manuscript. AJR 2005; 185:848-854
    • (2005) AJR , vol.185 , pp. 848-854
    • Provenzale, J.M.1    Stanley, R.J.2
  • 7
    • 20044379252 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Reviewing the reviewers: Comparison of review quality and reviewer characteristics at the American Journal of Roentgenology
    • Kliewer MA, Freed KS, DeLong DM, Provenzale JM. Reviewing the reviewers: comparison of review quality and reviewer characteristics at the American Journal of Roentgenology. AJR 2005; 184:1731-1735
    • (2005) AJR , vol.184 , pp. 1731-1735
    • Kliewer, M.A.1    Freed, K.S.2    Delong, D.M.3    Provenzale, J.M.4
  • 8
    • 84871861851 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Improving the quality of manuscript reviews: Impact of submitting a structured electronic template to submit reviews
    • Rajesh A, Cloud G, Harisinghani MG. Improving the quality of manuscript reviews: impact of submitting a structured electronic template to submit reviews. AJR 2013; 200:20-23
    • (2013) AJR , vol.200 , pp. 20-23
    • Rajesh, A.1    Cloud, G.2    Harisinghani, M.G.3

* 이 정보는 Elsevier사의 SCOPUS DB에서 KISTI가 분석하여 추출한 것입니다.