Publication in the AJR: Critical interactions among authors, reviewers, and section editors

American Journal of Roentgenology

Volumn 191, Issue 5, 2008, Pages 1291-1292

  Berquist, Thomas H ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AUTHOR; EDITOR; EDITORIAL; MEDICAL RESEARCH; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PUBLICATION; SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE;

EID: 55549092416     PISSN: 0361803X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2214/AJR.08.1810     Document Type: Editorial

References (16)

1. Berquist TH. Duplicate publishing or journal publication ethics 101. AJR 2008; 191:311-312
2. [No author listed]. Uniform requirements for manuscripts submitted to biomedical journals. N Engl J Med 1997; 336:309-315
3. Provenzale JM. Ten principles to improve the likelihood of publication of a scientific manuscript. AJR 2007; 188:1179-1182
4. Kliewer MA. Writing it up: a step-by-step guide to publication for beginning investigators. AJR 2005; 185:591-596
5. Pierson DJ. The top 10 reasons why manuscripts are not accepted for publication. Resp Care 2004; 49:1246-1252
6. Bordage G. Reasons reviewers reject and accept manuscripts: the strengths and weaknesses in medical education reports. Acad Med 2001; 76:889-896
7. Benos DJ, Bashari E, Chaves JM, et al. The ups and downs of peer review. Adv Physiol Educ 2007; 31:145-152
8. Resnick DB, Gutierrez-Ford C, Peddada S. Perceptions of ethical problems with scientific peer review: An exploratory study. Sci Eng Ethics 2008; 14:305-310
9. Jefferson T, Wager E, Davidoff F. Measuring the quality of editorial peer review. JAMA 2002; 287:2786-2790
10. Stanley RJ. To peer review or not to peer review: That seems to be the question. AJR 2005; 185:1101
11. Godlee F. Making reviewers visible. Openness, accountability and credit. JAMA 2002; 287: 2762-2765
12. Prakash ES. Open peer review of manuscripts submitted to journals for publication: the only way of setting the record of contribution to science straight enough. Med Educ Online 2007; 11: 1-2. www.med-ed-online.org/ pdf/l0000016.pdf. Accessed September 19, 2008
13. Provenzale JM, Stanley RJ. A systematic guide to reviewing a manuscript. AJR 2005; 185:848-854
14. Hoppin FG. How I review an original scientific article. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2002; 166: 1019-1023
15. Kliewer MA, Freed KS, DeLong DM, et al. Reviewing the reviewers: Comparison of review quality and reviewer characteristics at the American Journal of Roentgenology. AJR 2005; 184: 1731-1735
16. Richardson ML. Alphabetic bias in the selection of reviewers for the American Journal of Roentgenology. AJR 2008; 191:in press