Editors and reviewers: Roles and responsibilities

American Journal of Roentgenology

Volumn 198, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 245-

  Berquist, Thomas H ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONTINUING EDUCATION; EDITOR; EDITORIAL; ETHICAL DECISION MAKING; HUMAN; PEER REVIEW; POLICY; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROFESSIONAL SECRECY; PROFESSIONAL STANDARD; PUBLICATION; PUBLISHING; RESEARCH ETHICS; SCIENTIFIC MISCONDUCT; TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT;

EID: 84856092177     PISSN: 0361803X     EISSN: 15463141     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2214/AJR.11.8230     Document Type: Editorial

References (5)

1. Berquist TH. Plagiarism: I didn't mean to do it. AJR 2012; 198:1
2. Berquist TH. Publication in AJR: critical interactions among authors, reviewers, and section editors. AJR 2008; 191:1291-1292
3. Berquist TH, Uppot RN. Preview of 2012. AJR 2011; 197:1283-1284
4. Kliewer MA, Freed KS, DeLong DM, et al. Reviewing the reviewers: comparison of reviewer quality and reviewer characteristics for the American Journal of Roentgenology. AJR 2005; 184:1731-1735 (Pubitemid 40770139)
5. Stanley RJ, Provenzale JM. A systematic guide to reviewing a manuscript. AJR 2005; 185:848-854