Three-dimensional quantification of susceptibility artifacts from various metals in magnetic resonance images

Acta Biomaterialia

Volumn 9, Issue 9, 2013, Pages 8433-8439

  Imai, Haruki ^a   Tanaka, Yoji ^a   Nomura, Naoyuki ^b,c   Tsutsumi, Yusuke ^b   Doi, Hisashi ^b   Kanno, Zuisei ^a   Ohno, Kikuo ^a   Ono, Takashi ^a   Hanawa, Takao ^b,d  

^a TOKYO MEDICAL AND DENTAL UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^b TOKYO MEDICAL AND DENTAL UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^c TOHOKU UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^d UNIVERSITY OF TOKYO   (Japan)

Author keywords

Artifact volume; Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI); Magnetic susceptibility; Susceptibility artifact

Indexed keywords

BINARY ALLOYS; CHROMIUM ALLOYS; COBALT ALLOYS; COPPER; MAGNETIC SUSCEPTIBILITY; MAGNETISM; PHANTOMS; RENDERING (COMPUTER GRAPHICS); RESONANCE; THREE DIMENSIONAL COMPUTER GRAPHICS;

3D ARTIFACTS; AGAROSE; AGAROSE GEL; ARTIFACT VOLUME; GEL PHANTOM; MAGNETIC BALANCE; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; NB-TI ZR; NI-DOPED; SUSCEPTIBILITY ARTIFACTS;

MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING;

AGAROSE; ALUMINUM; CHROMIUM; COBALT; COPPER; METAL; MOLYBDENUM; NIOBIUM; SILVER; TIN; TITANIUM; ZIRCONIUM;

ACCELERATION; ARTICLE; ARTIFACT; MAGNETIC FIELD; MAGNETISM; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PHANTOM; PRIORITY JOURNAL; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING;

EID: 84880921321     PISSN: 17427061     EISSN: 18787568     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.actbio.2013.05.017     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. J. Olsrud, J. Lätt, S. Brockstedt, B. Romner, and I.M. Björkman-Burtscher Magnetic resonance imaging artifacts caused by aneurysm clips and shunt valves: dependence on field strength (1.5T and 3T) and imaging parameters J Magn Reson Imaging 22 2005 433 437 (Pubitemid 41298333)
2. L.W. Bartels, H. Smits, C. Bakker, and M. Viergever MR imaging of vascular stents: effects of susceptibility, flow, and radiofrequency eddy currents J Vasc Interv Radiol 12 2001 365 371 (Pubitemid 32217037)
3. Y. Okano, M. Yamashiro, T. Kaneda, and K. Kasai Magnetic resonance imaging diagnosis of the temporomandibular joint in patients with orthodontic appliances Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 95 2003 255 263 (Pubitemid 36890703)
4. J.M. Elison, V.L. Leggitt, M. Thomson, U. Oyoyo, and N.D. Wycliffe Influence of common orthodontic appliances on the diagnostic quality of cranial magnetic resonance images Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 134 2008 563 572
5. A.L.F. Costa, S. Appenzeller, C.L. Yasuda, F.R. Pereira, V.A. Zanardi, and F. Cendes Artifacts in brain magnetic resonance imaging due to metallic dental objects Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 14 6 2009 E278 E282
6. M.H. Bagheri, M.M. Hosseini, M.J. Emami, and A.A. Foroughi Metallic artifact in MRI after removal of orthopedic implants Eur J Radiol 81 2012 584 590
7. P.T. Knott, S.M. Mardjetko, R.H. Kim, T.M. Cotter, M.M. Dunn, and S.T. Patel A comparison of magnetic and radiographic imaging artifact after using three types of metal rods: stainless steel, titanium, and vitallium Spine J 10 2010 789 794
8. M. Lee, S. Kim, S.A. Lee, H.T. Song, Y.M. Huh, and D.H. Kim Overcoming artifacts from metallic orthopedic implants at high-field-strength MR imaging and multidetector CT Radiographics 27 2007 791 803
9. K.A. Buckwalter, C. Lin, and J.M. Ford Managing postoperative artifacts on computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging Semin Musculoskelet Radiol 15 4 2011 309 319
10. P. Stradiotti, A. Curti, G. Castellazzi, and A. Zerbi Metal-related artifacts in instrumented spine. Techniques for reducing artifacts in CT and MRI: state of the art Eur spine J 18 2009 102 108
11. J.D. Port, and M.G. Pomper Quantification and minimization of magnetic susceptibility artifacts on GRE images J Comput Assist Tomogr 24 6 2000 958 964 (Pubitemid 32201826)
12. A. Guermazi, Y. Miaux, S. Zaim, C.G. Peterfy, D. White, and H.K. Genant Metallic artefacts in MR imaging: effects of main field orientation and strength Clin Radiol 58 2003 322 328 (Pubitemid 36416977)
13. M.C. Oehler, P. Schmalbrock, D. Chakeres, and S. Kurucay Magnetic susceptibility artifacts on high-resolution MR of the temporal bone Am J Neuroradiol 16 1995 1135 1143
14. J. Weis, A. Ericsson, H.C. Son Silander, and A. Hemmingsson Magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging for visualization and correction of distortions in MRI: high precision applications in neurosurgery Magn Reson Imag 16 10 1998 1265 1272 (Pubitemid 29019552)
15. S. Skare, and J.L.R. Andersson Correction of MR image distortions induced by metallic objects using a 3-D cubic B-spline basis set: application to stereotactic surgical planning Magn Reson Med 54 2005 169 181 (Pubitemid 40898410)
16. Y. Pauchard, M.R. Smith, and M.P. Mintchev Improving geometric accuracy in the presence of susceptibility difference artifacts produced by metallic implants in magnetic resonance imaging IEEE Trans Med Imaging 24 10 2005 1387 1399 (Pubitemid 41463575)
17. L.N. Baldwin Characterization, prediction, and correction of geometric distortion in 3T MR images Med Phys 34 2 2007 388 399 (Pubitemid 46185117)
18. S. Burkhardt, A. Schweikard, and R. Burgkart Numerical determination of the susceptibility caused geometric distortions in magnetic resonance imaging Med Image Anal 7 2003 221 236 (Pubitemid 37080877)
19. S. Balac, G. Caloz, G. Cathelineau, B. Chauvel, and J.D. Certaines Integral method for numerical simulation of MRI artifacts induced by metallic implants Magn Reson Med 45 2001 724 727 (Pubitemid 32260098)
20. J.F. Schenck The role of magnetic susceptibility in magnetic resonance imaging: MRI magnetic compatibility of the first and second kinds Med Phys 23 6 1996 815 850 (Pubitemid 26192503)
21. F. Shafiei, E. Honda, H. Takahashi, and T. Sasaki Artifacts from dental casting alloys in magnetic resonance imaging J Dent Res 82 8 2003 602 606 (Pubitemid 41766141)
22. H. Matsuura, T. Inoue, K. Ogasawara, M. Sasaki, H. Konno, and Y. Kuzu Quantitative analysis of magnetic resonance imaging susceptibility artifacts caused by neurosurgical biomaterials: comparison of 0.5, 1.5, and 3.0 T magnetic fields Neurol Med Chir 45 2005 395 399
23. N. Nomura, Y. Tanaka, Suyalatu, R. Kondo, H. Doi, and Y. Tsutusmi Effects of phase construction of Zr-Nb alloys on their magnetic susceptibilities Mater Trans 50 10 2009 2466 2472
24. Suyalatu, N. Nomura, K. Oya, Y. Tanaka, R. Kondo, and H. Doi Microstructure and mechanical properties of as-cast Zr-Nb alloys Acta Biomater 7 12 2011 4278 4284
25. R. Kondo, N. Nomura, Suyalatu, Y. Tsutsumi, H. Doi, and T. Hanawa Microstructure and mechanical properties of as-cast Zr-Nb alloys Acta Biomater 7 12 2011 4278 4284
26. Suyalatu, R. Kondo, Y. Tsutsumi, H. Doi, N. Nomura, and T. Hanawa Effects of phase constitution on magnetic susceptibility and mechanical properties of Zr-rich Zr-Mo alloys Acta Biomater 7 12 2011 4259 4266
27. J.O. Christoffersson, L.E. Olsson, and S. Sjöberg Nickel-doped agarose gel phantoms in MR imaging Acta Radiol 32 1991 426 431
28. Standard test method for evaluation of MR image artifacts from passive implants. ASTM designation: F2119-01 2001; doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1520/F2119- 01.
29. D.R. Lide CRC handbook of chemistry and physics 87th ed. 2006 CRC Press Boca Raton, FL
30. J.Z. Wang, S. Li, and J.C. Haselgrove Magnetic resonance imaging measurement of volume magnetic susceptibility using a boundary condition J Magn Reson 140 1999 477 481 (Pubitemid 129608310)