Numerical determination of the susceptibility caused geometric distortions in magnetic resonance imaging

Medical Image Analysis

Volumn 7, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 221-236

  Burkhardt, Stefan ^a   Schweikard, Achim ^a   Burgkart, Rainer ^b  

^a TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

^b TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

Author keywords

Distortion correction; Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI); Magnetic susceptibility; Spatial distortions

Indexed keywords

TITANIUM;

ABDOMEN; ACCURACY; ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMUR; GEOMETRY; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; MAGNETIC FIELD; MATHEMATICAL COMPUTING; METAL IMPLANTATION; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROCESS OPTIMIZATION; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING;

EID: 0041324890     PISSN: 13618415     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1361-8415(02)00109-3     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Bakker, C.J.G., Bhagwandien, R., Moerland, M.A., Fuderer, M., 1993. Susceptibility artifacts in 2DFT spin-echo and gradient-echo imaging: The cylinder model revisited. Magnetic Resonance Imaging 11, 539-548.
2. Bakker, C.J.G., Bhagwandien, R., Moerland, M.A., Ramos, L.M.P., 1994. Simulation of susceptibility artifacts in 2D and 3D Fourier transform spin-echo and gradient-echo magnetic resonance imaging. Magnetic Resonance Imaging 12, 767-774.
3. Bellon, E.M., Haacke, E.M., Coleman, P.E., Sacco, D.C., Steiger, D.A., Gangarosa, R.E., 1986. MR artifacts: a review. American Journal of Roentgenology 147 (6), 1271-1281.
4. Bendel, P., 1985. Echo projection imaging - A method to obtain NMR images undistorted by magnetic field inhomogeneities. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging 4 (2).
5. Bhagwandien, R., 1994. Object induced geometry and intensity distortions in magnetic resonance imaging. Ph.D. thesis, Universiteit Utrecht, Faculteit Geneeskunde, ISBN: 90-393-0783-0.
6. Bhagwandien, R., van Ee, R., Beersma, R., Bakker, C.J.G., Moerland, M.A., Lagendijk, J.J.W., 1992. Numerical analysis of the magnetic field for arbitrary magnetic susceptibility distributions in 2D. Magnetic Resonance Imaging 10, 299-313.
7. Bhagwandien, R., Moerland, M.A., Bakker, C.J.G., Beersma, R., Lagendijk, J.J.W., 1994. Numerical analysis of the magnetic field for arbitrary magnetic susceptibility distributions in 3D. Magnetic Resonance Imaging 12, 101-107.
8. Burkhardt, S., Schwarzer, F., Schweikard, A., 2001. Evaluation of different statistics for medical image registration. Technische Universität München.
9. Burkhardt, S., Roth, M., Schweikard, A., Burgkart, R., 2002. Korrektur von geometrischen Verzeichnungen bei MR-Aufnahmen vom Femur. In: Bildverarbeitung für die Medizin 2002. Springer, Berlin, pp. 107-110.
10. Cohen, Z.A., Mc Carthy, D.M., Kwak, S.D., Legrand, P., Fogarasi, F., Ciaccio, E.J., Ateshian, G.A., 1999. Knee cartilage topography, thickness and contact areas from MRI: in-vitro calibration and in-vivo measurements. Osteoarthritis and Cartilage 7, 95-109.
11. Crooks, L.E., 1997. Instrumentation and techniques. In: Higgins, C.B., Hricak, H., Helms, C.A. (Eds.), Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Body, 3rd Edition. Lippincott-Raven, Philadelphia, Section 2, pp. 11-24.
12. de Munck, J.C., Bhagwandien, R., Muller, S.H., Vester, F.C., van Herk, M.B., 1996. The computation of MR image distortions caused by tissue susceptibility using the boundary element method. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging 15 (5), 620-627.
13. Frobin, W., Brinckmann, P., Kramer, M., Hartwig, E., 2001. Height of lumbar disc measured from radiographs compared with degeneration and height classified from MR images. European Radiology 11 (2), 263-269.
14. Hackbusch, W., 1992. Elliptic Differential Equations: Theory and Numerical Treatment. Springer, Berlin.
15. Hutchison, J.M.S., Sutherland, R.J., Mallard, J.R., 1978. NMR imaging: image recovery under magnetic fields with large non-uniformities. Journal of Physics/E 11 (3), 217-221.
16. Jackson, J.D., 1975. Classical Electrodynamics. John Wiley & Sons.
17. o field variations. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 34 (1), 65-73.
18. Lüdecke, K.M., Röschmann, P., Tischler, R., 1985. Susceptibility artefacts in NMR imaging. Magnetic Resonance Imaging 3 (4), 329-343.
19. Martel, A.L., Heid, O., Slomczykowski, M., Kerslake, R., Nolte, L.P., 1998. Assessment of 3-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging fast low angle show images for computer assisted spinal surgery. Computer Aided Surgery 3, 40-44.
20. Miller, J.B., Garroway, A.N., 1986. Removal of static field inhomogeneity and chemical-shift effects in NMR imaging. Journal of Magnetic Resonance 67, 575-579.
21. Moseley, M.E., Sawyer, A.M., 1997. Imaging techniques: Pulse sequences. In: Higgins, C.B., Hricak, H., Helms, C.A. (Eds.), Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Body, 3rd Edition. Lippincott-Raven, Philadelphia, Section 4, pp. 43-69.
22. O'Donnel, M., Edelstein, W.A., 1985. NMR imaging in the presence of magnetic field inhomogeneities and gradient field nonlinearities. Medical Physics 12 (1), 20-26.
23. Olscamp, A.J., Tao, S.S., Savolaine, E.R., Ebraheim, N.A., 1997. Postoperative magnetic resonance imaging evaluation of Pipkin fractures fixated with titanium implants: a report of two cases. American Journal of Orthopedics 26 (4), 294-297.
24. Press, W.H., Teukolsky, S.A., Vetterling, W.T., Flannery, B.P., 1992. Numerical Recipes in C, 2nd Edition. Cambridge University Press.
25. Roberts, T.P.L., 1997. Basic principles. In: Higgins, C.B., Hricak, H., Helms, C.A. (Eds.), Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Body, 3rd Edition. Lippincott-Raven, Philadelphia, Section 1, pp. 3-10.
26. Schnier, M., Priebsch, J., Faber, S., Haubner, M., Glaser, C., Englmeier, K.H., Reiser, M., Eckstein, F., 1998. Relevance of susceptibility-induced geometrical distortion for validity of MRI-based cartilage volume and density measurements in the knee joint. Biomedizinische Technik 43 (9), 243-248.
27. Sled, J.G., Pike, G.B., 1998. Understanding intensity non-uniformity in MRI. In: Medical Image Computing and Computer Assisted Intervention: First International Conference. Springer, pp. 614-622.
28. Wang, J.C., Yu, W.D., Sandhu, H.S., Tam, V., Delamarter, R.B., 1998. A comparison of magnetic resonance and computed tomographic image quality after the implantation of tantalum and titanium spinal instrumentation. Spine 23 (15), 1684-1688.
29. Wong, T.S., Rosenfeld, D., 1987. Spin-inversion imaging: a technique for NMR imaging under magnetic fields with high field nonuniformities. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging 6, 148-156.