Imaging of the prostate;Lokale Bildgebung der Prostata

Urologe - Ausgabe A

Volumn 52, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 490-496

  Walz, J ^a   Loch, T ^b   Salomon, G ^c   Wijkstra, H ^d  

^a INSTITUT PAOLI CALMETTES   (France)

^b Diakonissenkrankenhaus Flensburg   (Germany)

^c UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER HAMBURG EPPENDORF   (Germany)

^d ACADEMIC MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Contrast enhanced ultrasound; Elastography; Histoscanning system; Prostate cancer

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; ELASTOGRAPHY; GRAY SCALE ECHOGRAPHY; HUMAN; IMAGING SYSTEM; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; PROSTATE BIOPSY; PROSTATE CANCER; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL (TOPIC); TRANSRECTAL ULTRASONOGRAPHY;

ELASTICITY IMAGING TECHNIQUES; HUMANS; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; IMAGE-GUIDED BIOPSY; MALE; PROSTATIC NEOPLASMS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 84880919327     PISSN: 03402592     EISSN: 14330563     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00120-012-3103-3     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Aigner F, Pallwein L, Junker D et al (2010) Value of real-time elastography targeted biopsy for prostate cancer detection in men with prostate specific antigen 1.25 ng/ml or greater and 4.00 ng/ml or less. J Urol 184:913-917
2. Barr RG, Memo R, Schaub CR (2012) Shear wave ultrasound elastography of the prostate: initial results. Ultrasound Q 28:13-20
3. Braeckman J, Autier P, Garbar C et al (2008) Computer-aided ultrasonography (HistoScanning): a novel technology for locating and characterizing prostate cancer. BJU Int 101:293-298
4. Braeckman J, Autier P, Soviany C et al (2008) The accuracy of transrectal ultrasonography supplemented with computer-aided ultrasonography for detecting small prostate cancers. BJU Int 102:1560-1565
5. Brock M, Von Bodman C, Palisaar RJ et al (2012) The impact of real-time elastography guiding a systematic prostate biopsy to improve cancer detection rate: a prospective study of 353 patients. J Urol 187:2039-2043
6. Brock M, Von Bodman C, Sommerer F et al (2012) Comparison of real-time elastography with grey-scale ultrasonography for detection of organ-confined prostate cancer and extra capsular extension: a prospective analysis using whole mount sections after radical prostatectomy. BJU Int 108:217-222
7. Ganzer R, Brandtner A, Wieland WF et al (2012) Prospective blinded comparison of real-time sonoelastography targeted versus randomised biopsy of the prostate in the primary and re-biopsy setting. World J Urol 30:219-223
8. Grabski B, Baeurle L, Loch A et al (2011) Computerized transrectal ultrasound of the prostate in a multicenter setup (C-TRUS-MS): detection of cancer after multiple negative systematic random and in primary biopsies. World J Urol 29:573-579
9. Halpern EJ, Gomella LG, Forsberg F et al (2012) Contrast enhanced transrectal ultrasound for the detection of prostate cancer: a randomized, double-blind trial of dutasteride pretreatment. J Urol 188:1739-1745
10. Halpern EJ, Mccue PA, Aksnes AK et al (2002) Contrast-enhanced US of the prostate with Sonazoid: comparison with whole-mount prostatectomy specimens in 12 patients. Radiology 222:361-366
11. Heidenreich A, Bellmunt J, Bolla M et al (2011) EAU guidelines on prostate cancer. Part 1: screening, diagnosis, and treatment of clinically localised disease. Eur Urol 59:61-71
12. Jung EM, Wiggermann P, Greis C et al (2012) First results of endocavity evaluation of the microvascularization of malignant prostate tumors using contrast enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) including perfusion analysis: first results. Clin Hemorheol Microcirc 52:167-177
13. Loch T (2007) Computerized transrectal ultrasound (C-TRUS) of the prostate: detection of cancer in patients with multiple negative systematic random biopsies. World J Urol 25:375-380
14. Loch T, Leuschner I, Genberg C et al (2000) Improvement of transrectal ultrasound. Artificial neural network analysis (ANNA) in detection and staging of prostatic carcinoma. Urologe A 39:341-347
15. Mitterberger MJ, Aigner F, Horninger W et al (2010) Comparative efficiency of contrast-enhanced colour Doppler ultrasound targeted versus systematic biopsy for prostate cancer detection. Eur Radiol 20:2791-2796
16. Pallwein L, Mitterberger M, Pinggera G et al (2008) Sonoelastography of the prostate: comparison with systematic biopsy findings in 492 patients. Eur J Radiol 65:304-310
17. Pallwein L, Mitterberger M, Struve P et al (2007) Real-time elastography for detecting prostate cancer: preliminary experience. BJU Int 100:42-46
18. Rorvik J, Halvorsen OJ, Servoll E et al (1994) Transrectal ultrasonography to assess local extent of prostatic cancer before radical prostatectomy. Br J Urol 73:65-69
19. Salomon G, Kollerman J, Thederan I et al (2008) Evaluation of prostate cancer detection with ultrasound real-time elastography: a comparison with step section pathological analysis after radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol 54:1354-1362
20. Salomon G, Spethmann J, Beckmann A et al (2012) Accuracy of HistoScanning for the prediction of a negative surgical margin in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy. BJU Int 110(11):1714-1720
21. Sedelaar JP, Van Leenders GJ, Goossen TE et al (2002) Value of contrast ultrasonography in the detection of significant prostate cancer: correlation with radical prostatectomy specimens. Prostate 53:246-253
22. Simmons LA, Autier P, Zat'ura F et al (2012) Detection, localisation and characterisation of prostate cancer by prostate HistoScanning. BJU Int 110:28-35
23. Smeenge M, Mischi M, Laguna Pes MP et al (2011) Novel contrast-enhanced ultrasound imaging in prostate cancer. World J Urol 29:581-587
24. Strunk T, Decker G, Willinek W et al (2012) Combination of C-TRUS with multiparametric MRI: potential for improving detection of prostate cancer. World J Urol 53(11):1663-1669
25. Sumura M, Shigeno K, Hyuga T et al (2007) Initial evaluation of prostate cancer with real-time elastography based on step-section pathologic analysis after radical prostatectomy: a preliminary study. Int J Urol 14:811-816
26. Taverna G, Morandi G, Seveso M et al (2011) Colour Doppler and microbubble contrast agent ultrasonography do not improve cancer detection rate in transrectal systematic prostate biopsy sampling. BJU Int 108:1723-1727
27. Trabulsi EJ, Sackett D, Gomella LG et al (2010) Enhanced transrectal ultrasound modalities in the diagnosis of prostate cancer. Urology 76:1025-1033
28. Walz J, Graefen M, Chun FK et al (2006) High incidence of prostate cancer detected by saturation biopsy after previous negative biopsy series. Eur Urol 50:498-505
29. Walz J, Marcy M, Maubon T et al (2011) Real time elastography in the diagnosis of prostate cancer: comparison of preoperative imaging and histology after radical prostatectomy. Prog Urol 21:925-931
30. Walz J, Marcy M, Pianna JT et al (2011) Identification of the prostate cancer index lesion by real-time elastography: considerations for focal therapy of prostate cancer. World J Urol 29:589-594
31. Walz J, Thomassin J, Poizat F et al (2012) External validation of the ANNA/C-TRUS system regarding the correct identification of prostate cancer lesions in the diagnosis of prostate cancer. J Urol 187(Suppl)