Real time elastography in the diagnosis of prostate cancer: Comparison of preoperative imaging and histology after radical prostatectomy.;Élastographie en temps réel pour l'identification du cancer de prostate: Comparaison d'imagerie préopératoire avec l'anatomopathologie après prostatectomie totale

Progres en Urologie

Volumn 21, Issue 13, 2011, Pages 925-931

  Walz, J ^a   Marcy, M ^a   Maubon, T ^a   Brunelle, S ^a   Laroche, J ^a   Gravis, G ^a   Salem, N ^a   Bladou, F ^b  

^a INSTITUT PAOLI CALMETTES   (France)

^b MCGILL UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Cancer; Detection; Diagnosis; Elastography; Prostate; Radical prostatectomy; Real time

Indexed keywords

AGED; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; ECHOGRAPHY; ELASTOGRAPHY; HUMAN; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATHOLOGY; POSTOPERATIVE CARE; PREDICTIVE VALUE; PREOPERATIVE CARE; PROSTATE TUMOR; PROSTATECTOMY; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

AGED; ELASTICITY IMAGING TECHNIQUES; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; POSTOPERATIVE CARE; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; PREOPERATIVE CARE; PROSTATECTOMY; PROSTATIC NEOPLASMS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 83555173581     PISSN: 11667087     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.purol.2011.04.006     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Salomon G., Kollerman J., Thederan I., et al. Evaluation of prostate cancer detection with ultrasound real-time elastography: a comparison with step section pathological analysis after radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol 2008, 54:1354-1362.
2. Aigner F., Pallwein L., Junker D., et al. Value of real-time elastography targeted biopsy for prostate cancer detection in men with prostate specific antigen 1.25ng/ml or greater and 4.00ng/ml or less. J Urol 2010, 184:913-917.
3. Cochlin D.L., Ganatra R.H., Griffiths D.F. Elastography in the detection of prostatic cancer. Clin Radiol 2002, 57:1014-1020.
4. Konig K., Scheipers U., Pesavento A., et al. Initial experiences with real-time elastography guided biopsies of the prostate. J Urol 2005, 174:115-117.
5. Pallwein L., Aigner F., Faschingbauer R., et al. Prostate cancer diagnosis: value of real-time elastography. Abdom Imaging 2008, 33:729-735.
6. Pallwein L., Mitterberger M., Struve P., et al. Real-time elastography for detecting prostate cancer: preliminary experience. BJU Int 2007, 100:42-46.
7. Sumura M., Shigeno K., Hyuga T., et al. Initial evaluation of prostate cancer with real-time elastography based on step-section pathologic analysis after radical prostatectomy: a preliminary study. Int J Urol 2007, 14:811-816.
8. Hodge K.K., McNeal J.E., Terris M.K., et al. Random systematic versus directed ultrasound guided transrectal core biopsies of the prostate. J Urol 1989, 142:71-74. [74-5; discussion].
9. Irani J. The 20-core prostate biopsy protocol: a new gold standard?. Prog Urol 2008, 18:251-252.
10. Sedelaar J.P., Vijverberg P.L., De Reijke T.M., et al. Transrectal ultrasound in the diagnosis of prostate cancer: state of the art and perspectives. Eur Urol 2001, 40:275-284.
11. Beerlage H.P., Aarnink R.G., Ruijter E.T., et al. Correlation of transrectal ultrasound, computer analysis of transrectal ultrasound and histopathology of radical prostatectomy specimen. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis 2001, 4:56-62.
12. Rifkin M.D., Zerhouni E.A., Gatsonis C.A., et al. Comparison of magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasonography in staging early prostate cancer. Results of a multi-institutional cooperative trial. N Engl J Med 1990, 323:621-626.
13. Delongchamps N.B., de la Roza G., Jones R., et al. Saturation biopsies on autopsied prostates for detecting and characterizing prostate cancer. BJU Int 2009, 103:49-54.
14. Campos-Fernandes J.L., Bastien L., Nicolaiew N., et al. Prostate cancer detection rate in patients with repeated extended 21-sample needle biopsy. Eur Urol 2009, 55:600-606.
15. Tsutsumi M., Miyagawa T., Matsumura T., et al. The impact of real-time tissue elasticity imaging (elastography) on the detection of prostate cancer: clinicopathological analysis. Int J Clin Oncol 2007, 12:250-255.
16. Heidenreich A., Aus G., Bolla M., et al. EAU guidelines on prostate cancer. Eur Urol 2008, 53:68-80.
17. Turkbey B., Pinto P.A., Mani H., et al. Prostate cancer: value of multiparametric MR imaging at 3T for detection - histopathologic correlation. Radiology 2010, 255:89-99.
18. Hara N., Okuizumi M., Koike H., et al. Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) is a useful modality for the precise detection and staging of early prostate cancer. Prostate 2005, 62:140-147.
19. Sonnad S.S., Langlotz C.P., Schwartz J.S. Accuracy of MR imaging for staging prostate cancer: a meta-analysis to examine the effect of technologic change. Acad Radiol 2001, 8:149-157.
20. Engelbrecht M.R., Jager G.J., Laheij R.J., et al. Local staging of prostate cancer using magnetic resonance imaging: a meta-analysis. Eur Radiol 2002, 12:2294-2302.
21. Amsellem-Ouazana D., Younes P., Conquy S., et al. Negative prostatic biopsies in patients with a high risk of prostate cancer. Is the combination of endorectal MRI and magnetic resonance spectroscopy imaging (MRSI) a useful tool? A preliminary study. Eur Urol 2005, 47:582-586.
22. Puech P., Potiron E., Lemaitre L., et al. Dynamic contrast-enhanced-magnetic resonance imaging evaluation of intraprostatic prostate cancer: correlation with radical prostatectomy specimens. Urology 2009, 74:1094-1099.
23. Cornud F., Beuvon F., Thevenin F., et al. Quantitative dynamic MRI and localisation of non-palpable prostate cancer. Prog Urol 2009, 19:401-413.
24. Xu S., Kruecker J., Turkbey B., et al. Real-time MRI-TRUS fusion for guidance of targeted prostate biopsies. Comput Aided Surg 2008, 13:255-264.
25. Turkbey B., Albert P.S., Kurdziel K., et al. Imaging localized prostate cancer: current approaches and new developments. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2009, 192:1471-1480.
26. Eggert T., Brock M., Noldus J., et al. Rising PSA level and negative prostate biopsy. Can prostate elastography help?. Urologe A 2010, 49:376-380.
27. Eggert T., Khaled W., Wenske S., et al. Impact of elastography in clinical diagnosis of prostate cancer. A comparison of cancer detection between B-mode sonography and elastography-guided 10-core biopsies. Urologe A 2008, 47:1212-1217.
28. Nelson E.D., Slotoroff C.B., Gomella L.G., et al. Targeted biopsy of the prostate: the impact of color Doppler imaging and elastography on prostate cancer detection and Gleason score. Urology 2007, 70:1136-1140.