Past perspective is related to present relationships: Past-positive and negative time perspectives differentially predict rejection sensitivity

Psychological Record

Volumn 63, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 615-628

  Bernstein, Michael J ^a   Benfield, Jacob A ^a  

^a PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Cognitive processes; Interpersonal relations; Rejection sensitivity; Time perspective

Indexed keywords

EID: 84880853157     PISSN: 00332933     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.11133/j.tpr.2013.63.3.014     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. AYDUK, O., DOWNEY, G., TESTA, A., YEN, Y., & SHODA, Y. (1999). Does rejection elicit hostility in rejection sensitive women? Social Cognition, 17, 245-271. doi:10.1521/soco.l999.17.2.245
2. AYDUK, o., DOWNEY, G., & KIM, M. (2001). Rejection sensitivity and depressive symptoms in women. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 868-877. doi:10.1177/0146167201277009
3. AYDUK, O., GYURAK, A., & LUERSSEN, A. (2008). Individual differences in the rejectionaggression link in the hot sauce paradigm:The case of rejection sensitivity. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44, 775-782. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2007.07.004
4. AYDUK, O., MAY, D., DOWNEY, G., & HIGGINS, E. T. (2003). Tactical differences in coping with rejection sensitivity:The role of prevention pride. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29,435-448. doi:10.1177/ 0146167202250911
5. BOWLBY, J. (1969). Attachment:Attachment and loss (Vol. 1, 2nd ed.). New York, NY:Basic Books.
6. BROWN, E. R., DIEKMAN, A. B., & SCHNEIDER, M. C. (2011). A change will do us good:Threats diminish typical preferences for male leaders. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. doi:10.1177/0146167211403322
7. BUHRMESTER, M. D., KWANG, T., & GOSLING, S. D. (2011). Amazon's Mechanical Turk:A new source of inexpensive, yet high-quality data? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6, 3-5. doi:10.1177/0146167211403322
8. BUTLER, J. C., DOHERTY, M. S., & POTTER, R. M. (2007). Social antecedents and consequences of interpersonal rejection sensitivity. Personality and Individual Differences, 43,1376-1385. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2007.04.006
9. D'ALESSio, M., GUARINO, A., DE PASCALIS, v., & ZIMBARDO, p. G. (2003). Testing Zimbardo's Stanford Time Perspective Inventory (STPI)-Short Form:An Italian study. Time and Society, 12, 333-347.
10. DOWNEY, G., BERENSON, K. R., & KANG, J. (2006). The adult rejection sensitivity questionnaire (ASRQ). New York, NY:Columbia University.
11. DOWNEY, G., & FELDMAN, S. (1996). Implications of rejection sensitivity for intimate relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70,1327-1343.
12. DOWNEY, G., FREITAS, A. L., MICHAELIS, B., & KHOURI, H. (1998). The self-fulfilling prophecy in close relationships:Rejection sensitivity and rejection by romantic partners. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 545-560.
13. FELDMAN, S., & DOWNEY, G. (1994). Rejection sensitivity as a mediator of the impact of childhood exposure to family violence on adult attachment behavior. Development and Psychopathology, 6, 231-247. doi:10.1017/ S0954579400005976
14. GOLDBERG, L. R., JOHNSON, J. A., EBER, H. W., HOGAN, R., ASHTON, M. C., CLONINGER, C. R., & GOUGH, H. C. (2006). The International Personality Item Pool and the future of public-domain personality measures. Journal of Research in Personality, 40, 84-96. doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2005.08.007
15. HARBER, K. D., ZIMBARDO, P. G., & BOYD, J. N. (2003). Participant self-selection biases as a function of individual differences in time perspective. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 25, 255-264. doi:10.1207/S15324834BASP2503-08
16. HAZAN, c., & SHAVER, P. (1987). Romantic love conceptualized as an attachment process. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 511-524.
17. IMPETT, E. A., GABLE, S. L., & PEPLAU, L. A. (2005). Giving up and giving in:The costs and benefits of daily sacrifice in intimate relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 327-344.
18. JOHN, O. P., & SRIVASTAVA, S. (1999). The big five trait taxonomy:History, measurement, and theoretical perspectives. In L. A. Pervin (Ed.), Handbook of personality theory and research (pp. 102-138). New York, NY:Guilford Press.
19. KEOUGH, K. A., ZIMBARDO, P. G., & BOYD, J. N. (1999). Who's smoking, drinking, and using drugs? Time Perspective as a predictor of substance abuse. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 21,149-164. doi:10.1207/S15324834BA210207
20. LEWIN, K. (1951). Field theory in the social sciences:Selected theoretical papers. New York, NY:Harper.
21. MCLACHLAN, J., ZIMMER-GEMBECK, M. J., & MCGREGOR, L. (2010). Rejection sensitivity in childhood and early adolescence:Peer rejection and protective effects of parents and friends. Journal of Relationships Research, 1, 31-40.
22. MILFONT, T. L., ANDRADE, P. R., BELO, R. P., & PESSOA, V. s. (2008). Testing Zimbardo time perspective inventory in a Brazilian sample. Interamerican Journal of Psychology, 42, 49-58.
23. PAOLACCI, G., CHANDLER, J., & IPEIROTIS, P. G. (2010). Running experiments on Amazon Mechanical Turk. Judgment and Decision Making, 5, 411-419.
24. PURDIE, V., & DOWNEY, G. (2000). Rejection sensitivity and adolescent girls' vulnerability to relationship-centered difficulties. Child Maltreatment, 5, 338-349. doi:10.1177/1077559500005004005
25. ROMERO-CANYAS, R., DOWNEY, G., REDDY, K. A., RODRIGUEZ, S., CAVANAUGH, T. J., & PELAYO, R. (2010). Paying to belong:When does rejection trigger ingratiation? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99, 802-823. doi:10.1037/a0020013
26. ROTHSPAN, S., & READ, S. J. (1996). Present versus future time perspective and HIV risk among heterosexual college students. Health Psychology, 15,131-134. doi:10.1037/0278-6133.15.2.131
27. STRAUS, M. (1979). Measuring intrafamily conflict and violence:The Conflict Tactics (CT) Scale. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 41, 75-88.
28. SUDDENDORF, T., & CORBALLIS, M. C., (1997). Mental time travel and the evolution of the human mind. New York, NY:Basic Books.
29. SURI, S., & WATTS, D. J. (2011). A study of cooperation and contagion in web-based, networked public goods experiments. PLoS ONE, 6(3). doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0016836
30. WILLIAMS, K. D. (2001). Ostracism:The power of silence. New York, NY:Guilford Press. doi:10.1176/appi.ps.54.1.114
31. WILLIAMS, K. D. (2007). Ostracism. Annual Review of Psychology, 58,425-452. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych. doi:58.110405.085641
32. WORRELL, F. c., & ZENO, R. M. (2007). The reliability and validity of Zimbardo time perspective inventory scores in academically talented adolescents. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 67,487-504. doi:10.1177/0013164406296985
33. ZIMBARDO, P. G., & BOYD, J. N. (1999). Putting time in perspective:A valid, reliable individual-differences metric. Journal of Personality and Individual Differences, 77,1271-1288.
34. ZIMBARDO, P. G., & BOYD, J. N. (2008). The time paradox. New York, NY:Free Press.
35. ZIMBARDO, P. G., KEOUGH, K. A., & BOYD, J. N. (1997). Present time perspective as a predictor of risky driving. Personality and Individual Differences, 23,1007-1023. doi:10.1016/S0191-8869(97)00113-X
36. ZIMET, G., DAHLEM, N., ZIMET, s., & FARLEY, G. (1988). The multidimensional scale of perceived social support. Journal of Personality Assessment, 52, 30-41. doi:10.1207/sl5327752jpa5201-2