Enemy release promotes range expansion in a host plant

Oecologia

Volumn 172, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 1203-1212

  Lakeman Fraser, Poppy ^a   Ewers, Robert M ^a  

^a IMPERIAL COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Biotic interactions; Climate change; Predator release; Range margin; Translocation

Indexed keywords

CLIMATE CHANGE; EDGE EFFECT; ENEMY RELEASE HYPOTHESIS; GROWTH RATE; HERBIVORE; HOST PLANT; LATITUDE; MACROECOLOGY; MOTH; PLANT-HERBIVORE INTERACTION; PREDATOR; RANGE EXPANSION; SHRUB; SURVIVAL; TRANSLOCATION; UNDERSTORY;

CLEORA SCRIPTARIA; MACROPIPER EXCELSUM;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; CLIMATE CHANGE; ECOSYSTEM; MOTH; NEW ZEALAND; PIPERACEAE; STATISTICAL MODEL;

ANIMALS; CLIMATE CHANGE; ECOSYSTEM; LINEAR MODELS; MOTHS; NEW ZEALAND; PIPERACEAE;

EID: 84880831972     PISSN: 00298549     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00442-012-2555-x     Document Type: Article

References (81)

1. Araujo MB, Guisan A (2006) Five (or so) challenges for species distribution modelling. J Biogeogr 33: 1677-1688.
2. Araújo MB, Luoto M (2007) The importance of biotic interactions for modelling species distributions under climate change. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 16: 743-753.
3. Beaugrand G, Reid PC, Ibañez F, Lindley JA, Edwards M (2002) Reorganization of North Atlantic marine copepod biodiversity and climate. Science 296: 1692-1694.
4. Box EO (1981) Macroclimate and plant forms: an introduction to predictive modelling in phytogeography. Junk, The Hague.
5. Brooker RW, Travis JMJ, Clark EJ, Dytham C (2007) Modelling species' range shifts in a changing climate: the impacts of biotic interactions, dispersal distance and the rate of climate change. J Theor Biol 245: 59-65.
6. Bullock JM, Edwards RJ, Carey PD, Rose RJ (2000) Geographical separation of two Ulex species at three spatial scales: does competition limit species' ranges? Ecography 23: 257-271.
7. Chen I-C, Hill JK, Ohlemuller R, Roy DB, Thomas CD (2011) Rapid range shifts of species associated with high levels of climate warming. Science 333: 1024-1026.
8. Clausen JD, Keck D, Hiesey WM (1940) Experimental studies on the nature of species. I. Effect of varied environments on western North American plants. Washington, DC.
9. Connell JH (2011) The influence of interspecific competition and other factors on the distribution of the barnacle Chthamalus stellatus. Ecol Soc Am 42: 710-723.
10. Davies-Colley RJ, Payne GW, van Elswijk M, Elswijk MV (2000) Microclimate gradients across a forest edge. N Z J Ecol 24: 111-121.
11. Davis MB, Shaw RG (2001) Range shifts and adaptive responses to Quaternary climate change. Science 292: 673-679.
12. Davis AJ, Lawton JH, Shorrocks B, Jenkinson LS (1998) Individualistic species responses invalidate simple physiological models of community dynamics under global environmental change. J Anim Ecol 67: 600-612.
13. DeFrenne P, Kolb A, Verheyen K, Brunet J, Chabrerie O, Decocq G, Diekmann M, Eriksson O, Heinken T, Hermy M, Jogar U, Stanton S, Quataert P, Zindel R, Zobel M, Graae BJ, Jõgar Ü (2009) Unravelling the effects of temperature, latitude and local environment on the reproduction of forest herbs. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 18: 641-651.
14. DeRivera CE, Ruiz GM, Hines AH, Jivoff P, Derivera CE (2005) Biotic resistance to invasion: native predator limits abundance and distribution of an introduced crab. Ecology 86: 3364-3376.
15. Elith J, Leathwick JR (2009) Species distribution models: ecological explanation and prediction across space and time. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 40: 677-697.
16. Ewers RM, Kliskey AD, Walker S, Rutledge D, Harding JS, Didham RK (2006) Past and future trajectories of forest loss in New Zealand. Biol Conserv 133: 312-325.
17. Gardner RO (1997) Macropiper (Piperaceae) in the south-west Pacific. N Z J Bot 35: 293-307.
18. Gaston JK (2003) The structure and dynamics of geographic ranges. Oxford University Press, USA.
19. Grashof-Bokdam CJ, Geertsema W (1998) The effect of isolation and history on colonization patterns of plant species in secondary woodland. J Biogeogr 25: 837-846.
20. Guisan A, Thuiller W (2005) Predicting species distribution: offering more than simple habitat models. Ecol Lett 8: 993-1009.
21. Hampe A (2004) Bioclimate envelope models: what they detect and what they hide. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 13: 469-471.
22. Heikkinen RK, Luoto M, Virkkala R, Pearson RG, Körber J-H, Korber J (2007) Biotic interactions improve prediction of boreal bird distributions at macro-scales. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 16: 754-763.
23. Hickling R, Roy DB, Hill JK, Fox R, Thomas CD (2006) The distributions of a wide range of taxonomic groups are expanding polewards. Glob Change Biol 12: 450-455.
24. Hodge S (1998) Herbivore damage and leaf loss in the New Zealand pepper tree ('Kawakawa'; Macopiper excelsum; Piperaceae). N Z J Ecol 22: 173-180.
25. Holdridge LR (1947) Determination of world plant formations from simple climatic data. Science 105: 367-368.
26. Ibáñez I, Clark JS, Dietze MC (2008) Evaluating the sources of potential migrant species: implications under climate change. Ecol Appl 18: 1664-1678.
27. Ibáñez I, Silander JA Jr, Allen JM, Treanor S, Wilson A (2009a) Identifying hotspots for plant invasions and forecasting focal points of further spread. J Appl Ecol 46: 1219-1228.
28. Ibáñez I, Silander JA Jr, Wilson AM, LaFleur N, Tanaka N, Tsuyama I (2009b) Multivariate forecasts of potential distributions of invasive plant species. Ecol Appl 19: 359-375.
29. IPCC (2007) Climate change synthesis report. In: Pachauri RK, Reisinger A (eds) Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Fourth Assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.
30. Jiménez-Valverde A, Lobo JM, Hortal J (2008) Not as good as they seem: the importance of concepts in species distribution modelling. Divers Distrib 14: 885-890.
31. Kawecki TJ (2008) Adaptation to marginal habitats. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 39: 321-342.
32. Keane RM, Crawley MJ (2002) Exotic plant invasions and the enemy release hypothesis. Trends Ecol Evol 17: 164-170.
33. Kollmann J, Bañuelos MJ, Banuelos MJ (2004) Latitudinal trends in growth and phenology of the invasive alien plant Impatiens glandulifera (Balsaminaceae). Divers Distrib 10: 377-385.
34. Lapointe BE, Pierce F, William B, Burnett B, Grant S (2011) Nutrient thresholds for bottom-up control of macroalgal Jamaica and southeast Florida. Limnol Oceanogr 42: 1119-1131.
35. Leathwick J, McGlone M, Walker S (2004) New Zealand's potential vegetation pattern. Whenua, Lincoln.
36. Macel M, Lawson CS, Mortimer SR, Šmilauerova M, Crémieux L, Doležal J, Edwards AR, Lanta V, Martijn T, Putten WHVD, Igual JM, Rodriguez-barrueco C, Müller- H, Steinger T, Lawson S, Edwards R, Dolezal J (2007) Climate versus soil factors in local adaptation of two common plant species. Ecology 88: 424-433.
37. Magnani F (2009) Phenotypic variability: underlying mechanisms and limits do matter. New Phytol 184: 277-279.
38. Maron JL, Vila M (2001) When do herbivores affect plant invasion? Evidence for the natural enemies and biotic resistance hypotheses. Oikos 95: 361-373.
39. Marsico TD, Hellmann JJ (2009) Dispersal limitation inferred from an experimental translocation of Lomatium (Apiaceae) species outside their geographic ranges. Oikos 118: 1783-1792.
40. Matesanz S, Gianoli E, Valladares F (2010) Global change and the evolution of phenotypic plasticity in plants. In: Schlichting CD, Mousseau TA (eds) Year in evolutionary biology. Wiley-Blackwell, Malden, pp 35-55.
41. Meier ES, Kienast F, Pearman PB, Svenning JC, Thuiller W, Araujo MB, Guisan A, Zimmermann NE (2010) Biotic and abiotic variables show little redundancy in explaining tree species distributions. Ecography 33: 1038-1048.
42. Menéndez R, González-Megías A, Lewis OT, Shaw MR, Thomas CD (2008) Escape from natural enemies during climate-driven range expansion: a case study. Ecol Entomol 33: 413-421.
43. Ministry for the Environment (2008) Climate change effects and impacts assessment: a guidance manual for local government in New Zealand, 2nd edn. Mullan B, Wratt D, Dean S, Hollis M, Allan S, Williams T, Kenny G (eds) Ministry for the Environment, Wellington.
44. Moore P, Hawkins SJ, Thompson RC (2007) Role of biological habitat amelioration in altering the relative responses of congeneric species to climate change. Marine Ecol Prog Ser 334: 11-19.
45. Morin X, Lechowicz MJ (2008) Contemporary perspectives on the niche that can improve models of species range shifts under climate change. Biol Lett 4: 573-576.
46. Niedrist G, Bertoldi G, Della Chiesa S, Hell V, Tasser E, Tappeiner U (2011) Transplantation experiments in an inner-alpine dry valley to predict climate change effects on agriculturally used grassland ecosystem. In: Geophysical Research Abstracts, EGU General Assembly 2011, pp 10218-10218.
47. Norton LR, Firbank LG, Scott A, Watkinson AR (2005) Characterising spatial and temporal variation in the finite rate of population increase across the northern range boundary of the annual grass Vulpia fasciculata. Oecologia 144: 407-415.
48. Parmesan C (1996) Climate and species' range. Nature 382: 765-766.
49. Parmesan C, Yohe G (2003) A globally coherent fingerprint of climate change impacts across natural systems. Nature 421: 37-42.
50. Parmesan C, Ryrholm N, Stefanescu C, Hill JK, Thomas CD, Descimon H, Huntley B, Kaila L, Kullberg J, Tammaru T, Tennent WJ, Thomas JA, Warren M (1999) Poleward shifts in geographical ranges of butterfly species associated with regional warming. Nature 399: 579-583.
51. Parmesan C, Gaines S, Gonzalez L, Kaufman DM, Kingsolver J, Townsend Peterson A, Sagarin R (2005) Empirical perspectives on species borders: from traditional biogeography to global change. Oikos 108: 58-75.
52. Pearson RG, Dawson TP (2003) Predicting the impacts of climate change on the distribution of species: are bioclimate envelope models useful? Global Ecol Biogeogr 12: 361-371.
53. Pearson RG, Dawson TP (2005) Long-distance plant dispersal and habitat fragmentation: identifying conservation targets for spatial landscape planning under climate change. Biol Conserv 123: 389-401.
54. Poloczanska ES, Hawkins SJ, Southward AJ, Burrows MT (2008) Modelling the response of populations of competing species to climate change. Ecology 89: 3138-3149.
55. Post E, Forchhammer MC (2008) Climate change reduces reproductive success of an Arctic herbivore through trophic mismatch. Philos Transact R Soc B-Biol Sci 363: 2369-2375.
56. Prince SD, Carter RN (1985) Topographical distribution of prickly lettuce (Lactuca serriola). III. Its performance in transplant sites beyond is distribution limit in Britain. J Ecol 73: 49-64.
57. R Development Core Team (2010) R: a language and environment for statistical computing.
58. Rutledge D (2003) Landscape indices as measures of the effects of fragmentation: can pattern reflect process?.
59. Schnitzler FR (2008) Hymenopteran parasitoid diversity and tri-trophic interactions: the effects of habitat fragmentation in Wellington. Victoria University of Wellington, New Zealand.
60. Schnitzler F-RR, Hartley S, Lester PJ (2011) Trophic-level responses differ at plant, plot, and fragment levels in urban native forest fragments: a hierarchical analysis. Ecol Entomol 36: 241-250.
61. Schweiger O, Settele J, Kudrna O, Klotz S, Kuhn I, Kühn I (2008) Climate change can cause spatial mismatch of trophically interacting species. Ecology 89: 3472-3479.
62. Silander JA, Klepeis DM (1999) The invasion ecology of Japanese barberry (Berberis thunbergii) in the New England landscape. Biol Invasions 1: 189-201.
63. Smith AC (1975) The genus Macropiper (Piperaceae). Bot J Linn Soc 71: 1-38.
64. Spiller DM, Wise KAJ (1982) A catalogue (1860-1960) of New Zealand insects and their host plants. In: New Zealand Department of Scientific and Industrial Research, Wellington, NZ.
65. Suttle KB, Thomsen MA, Power ME (2007) Species interactions reverse grassland responses to changing climate. Science 315: 640-642.
66. Svenning J-C, Skov F (2007) Could the tree diversity pattern in Europe be generated by postglacial dispersal limitation? Ecol Lett 10: 453-460.
67. The Native Plant Centre: New Zealand Native Plant Specialists (2007) The Native Plant Centre. 3rd December 2012. (http://www. nznativeplants. co. nz/Articles/Macropiper+excelsum. html).
68. Thomas CD (2010) Climate, climate change and range boundaries. Divers Distrib 16: 488-495.
69. Thomas CD, Lennon JJ (1999) Birds extend their ranges northwards. Nature 399: 213.
70. Tylianakis JM, Didham RK, Bascompte J, Wardle DA (2008) Global change and species interactions in terrestrial ecosystems. Ecol Lett 11: 1351-1363.
71. Urban MC, Tewksbury JJ, Sheldon KS (2012) On a collision course: competition and dispersal differences create no-analogue communities and cause extinctions during climate change. In: Proceedings biological sciences/the Royal Society. Published online 4 January 2012.
72. van der Heijden MGA, Wiemken A, Sanders IR (2003) Different arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi alter coexistence and resource distribution between co-occurring plant. New Phytol 157: 569-578.
73. van der Putten WH, Macel M, Visser ME (2010) Predicting species distribution and abundance responses to climate change: why it is essential to include biotic interactions across trophic levels. Philos Trans R Soc B-Biol Sci 365: 2025-2034.
74. Wahl M, Link H, Alexandridis N, Thomason JC, Cifuentes M, Costello MJ, da Gama BAP, Hillock K, Hobday AJ, Kaufmann MJ, Keller S, Kraufvelin P, Kruger I, Lauterbach L, Antunes BL, Molis M, Nakaoka M, Nystrom J, Radzi Z, Stockhausen B, Thiel M, Vance T, Weseloh A, Whittle M, Wiesmann L, Wunderer L, Yamakita T, Lenz M (2011) Re-structuring of marine communities exposed to environmental change: a global study on the interactive effects of species and functional richness. PLoS ONE 6: e19514.
75. Walker MD, Wahren CH, Hollister RD, Henry GHR, Ahlquist LE, Alatalo JM, Bret-Harte MS, Calef MP, Callaghan TV, Carroll AB, Epstein HE, Jónsdóttir IS, Klein JA, Magnússon B, Molau U, Oberbauer SF, Rewa SP, Robinson CH, Shaver GR, Suding KN, Thompson CC, Tolvanen A, Totland Ø, Turner PL, Tweedie CE, Webber PJ, Wookey PA, Jonsdottir IS, Magnusson B, Totland O (2006) Plant community responses to experimental warming across the tundra biome. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103: 1342-1346.
76. Walther GR (2004) Plants in a warmer world. Perspect Plant Ecol Evol Syst 6: 169-185.
77. Willis SG, Hill JK, Thomas CD, Roy DB, Fox R, Blakeley DS, Huntley B (2009) Assisted colonization in a changing climate: a test-study using two UK butterflies. Conserv Lett 2: 46-52.
78. Wilmshurst JM, Anderson AJ, Higham TFG, Worthy TH (2008) Dating the late prehistoric dispersal of Polynesians to New Zealand using the commensal Pacific rat. PNAS 105: 7676-7680.
79. Winder M, Schindler DE (2004) Climate change uncouples trophic interactions in an aquatic ecosystem. Ecology 85: 2100-2106.
80. Yang LH, Rudolf VHW (2010) Phenology, ontogeny and the effects of climate change on the timing of species interactions. Ecol Lett 13: 1-10.
81. Young A, Mitchell N (1994) Microclimate and vegetation edge effects in a fragmented podocarp-broadleaf forest in New Zealand. Biol Conserv 67: 63-72.