Climate change can cause spatial mismatch of trophically interacting species

Ecology

Volumn 89, Issue 12, 2008, Pages 3472-3479

  Schweiger, Oliver ^a,b   Settele, Josef ^a   Kudrna, Otakar ^c   Klotz, Stefan ^a,b   Kühn, Ingolf ^a,b  

^a HELMHOLTZ CENTRE FOR ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH UFZ   (Germany)

^b Virtual Institute for Macroecology   (Germany)

^c NONE   (Germany)

Author keywords

Biotic interactions; Boloria titania; Butterflies; Climate envelope modeling; Ecological niche modeling; European species distribution data; Global change; Host plants; Polygonum bistorta; Range shift; Species interactions; Trophic interactions

Indexed keywords

BIODIVERSITY; BUTTERFLY; CLIMATE CHANGE; CLIMATE EFFECT; CLIMATE MODELING; COEXISTENCE; ECOLOGICAL MODELING; HOST PLANT; LAND COVER; TROPHIC INTERACTION;

BOLORIA TITANIA; PAPILIONOIDEA; POLYGONUM; POLYGONUM BISTORTA;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BIODIVERSITY; BUTTERFLY; CLIMATE; ECOSYSTEM; FEMALE; FORECASTING; GEOGRAPHY; GREENHOUSE EFFECT; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; LARVA; MALE; PHYSIOLOGY; POLYGONUM; POPULATION DYNAMICS; POPULATION GROWTH; SPECIES DIFFERENCE;

ANIMALS; BIODIVERSITY; BUTTERFLIES; CLIMATE; ECOSYSTEM; FEMALE; FORECASTING; GEOGRAPHY; GREENHOUSE EFFECT; LARVA; MALE; POLYGONUM; POPULATION DYNAMICS; POPULATION GROWTH; SPECIES SPECIFICITY;

EID: 47049119715     PISSN: 00129658     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1890/07-1748.1     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Araújo, M. B., and M. Luoto. 2007. The importance of biotic interactions for modeling species distributions under climate change. Global Ecology and Biogcography 16:743-753.
2. Araújo, M. B., W. Thuiller, and R. G. Pearson. 2006. Climate warming and the decline of amphibians and reptiles in Europe. Journal of Biogcography 33:1712-1728.
3. Araújo, M. B., W. Thuiller, P. H. Williams, and I. Rcginster. 2005. Downscaling European species atlas distributions to a finer resolution: implications for conservation planning. Global Ecology and Biogeography 14:17-30.
4. Bink, F. A. 1992, Ecologische Atlas van de Dagvlinders van Noordwest-Europa. Schuyt, Haarlem, The Netherlands.
5. Clark, J. S., M. Lewis, J. S. McLachlan, and J. HilleRis-Lambers. 2003. Estimating population spread: What can we forecast and how well? Ecology 84:1979-1988.
6. Davis, A. J., L. S. Jenkinson, J. H. Lawton, B. Shorrocks, and S. Wood. 1998. Making mistakes when predicting shifts in species range in response to global warming. Nature 391:783-786.
7. Durant, J. M., D. O. Hjermann, G. Ottersen, and N. C. Stenseth. 2007. Climate and the match or mismatch between predator requirements and resource availability. Climate Research 33:271-283.
8. European Soil Database. 2004. European Soil Bureau Network and the European Commission, EUR 19945 EN, March 2004. (http://eusoils.jrc.it/ESDB- Archive/ ESDB-Data-Distribution/ESDB-data.html)
9. Fielding, A. H., and J. F. Bell. 1997. A review of methods for the assessment of prediction errors in conservation presence/ absence models. Environmental Conservation 24:38-49.
10. Guisan, A., and W. Thuiller. 2005. Predicting species distribution: offering more than simple habitat models. Ecology Letters 8:993-1009.
11. Hampe, A. 2004. Bioclimate envelope models: what they detect and what they hide. Global Ecology and Biogeography 13: 469-471.
12. Heikkinen, R. K., M. Luoto, M. B. Araujo, R. Virkkala, W. Thuiller, and M. T. Sykes. 2006. Methods and uncertainties in bioclimatic envelope modeling under climate change. Progress in Physical Geography 30:751-777.
13. Heikkinen, R. K., M. Luoto, R. Virkkala, R. G. Pearson, and J. H. Korber. 2007. Biotic interactions improve prediction of boreal bird distributions at macro-scales. Global Ecology and Biogeography 16:754-763.
14. Hewitt, G. 2000. The genetic legacy of the Quaternary ice ages. Nature 405:907-913.
15. Hickling, R., D. B. Roy, J. K. Hill, R. Fox, and C. D. Thomas. 2006. The distributions of a wide range of taxonomic groups are expanding polewards. Global Change Biology 12:450-455.
16. Hilbig, W. 1995. The vegetation of Mongolia. SPB Publishing, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
17. Hill, J. K., Y. C. Collingham, C. D. Thomas, D. S. Blakeley, R. Fox, D. Moss, and B, Huntley. 2001. Impacts of landscape structure on butterfly range expansion. Ecology Letters 4: 313-321.
18. Hill, J. K., C. D. Thomas, R. Fox, M. G. Telfcr, S. G. Willis, J. Asher, and B. Huntley. 2002. Responses of butterflies to twentieth century climate warming: implications for future ranges. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 269: 2163-2171.
19. Huntley, B., R. E. Green, Y. C. Collingham, J. K. Hill, S. G. Willis, P. J. Bartlein, W. Cramer, W. J. M. Hagemeijer, and C. J. Thomas. 2004. The performance of models relating species geographical distributions to climate is independent of trophic level. Ecology Letters 7:417-426.
20. Ibáñez, L. J. S. Clark, M, C. Dietze, K. Feeley, M. Hersh, S. LaDeau, A. McBride, N. E. Welch, and M. S. Wolosin. 2006. Predicting biodiversity change: outside the climate envelope, beyond the species-area curve. Ecology 87:1896-1906.
21. IPCC [Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change], 2001. Climate change 2001: the scientific basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
22. Jonzcn, N., A. Hedenstrom, and P. Lundbcrg. 2007. Climate change and the optimal arrival of migratory birds. Proceedings of the Royal Society B 274:269-274.
23. Jump, A. S., and J. Penuelas. 2005. Running to stand still: adaptation and the response of plants to rapid climate change. Ecology Letters 8:1010-1020.
24. Kudrna, O.2002. The distribution atlas of European butterflies. Apollo Books, Stenstrup, Denmark.
25. Kunte, K. 2008. Competition and species diversity: removal of dominant species increases diversity in Costa Rican butterfly communities. Oikos 117:69-76.
26. Langham, G. M. 2004. Specialized avian predators repeatedly attack novel color morphs of Heliconius butterflies. Evolution 58:2783-2787.
27. Lathi, T., and R. Lampinen. 1999. From dot maps to bitmaps: Atlas Florae Europaeae goes digital. Acta Botanica Fennica 162:5-9.
28. Lei, G, C., and I. Hanski, 1997, Metapopulation structure of Cotesia melitaearum, a specialist parasitoid of the butterfly Melitaea cinxia. Oikos 78:91-100.
29. Manel, S., H. C. Williams, and S. J, Ormerod. 2001. Evaluating presence-absence models in ecology: the need to account for prevalence. Journal of Applied Ecology 38:921-931.
30. Martin, T. E. 2007. Climate correlates of 20 years of trophic changes in a high-elevation riparian system. Ecology 88:367-380.
31. Mennechez, G., S. Petit, N. Schtickzelle, and M. Baguette. 2004. Modelling mortality and dispersal: consequences of parameter generalisation on metapopulation dynamics. Oikos 106:243-252.
32. Mitchell, T. D., T. R. Carter, P. D. Jones, M. Hulme, and M. New. 2004. A comprehensive set of high-resolution grids of monthly climate for Europe and the globe: the observed record (1901-2000) and 16 scenarios (2001-2100). Tyndall Centre for Climate Change Research, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK.
33. Mucher, C. A., K. T. Steinnocher, F. P. Kressler, and C. Heunks. 2000. Land cover characterization and change detection for environmental monitoring of pan-Europe, International Journal of Remote Sensing 21:1159-1181.
34. New, M., M. Hulme, and P. Jones. 2000. Representing twentieth-century space-time climate variability. Part II: Development of 1901-96 monthly grids of terrestrial surface climate. Journal of Climate 13:2217-2238.
35. Ohlemtiller, R., E. S, Gritti, M. T. Sykes, and C. D. Thomas. 2006. Quantifying components of risk for European woody species under climate change. Global Change Biology 12: 1788-1799,
36. Parmesan, C., and G. Yohe. 2003. A globally coherent fingerprint of climate change impacts across natural systems. Nature 421:37-42.
37. Pearson, R. G., and T. P. Dawson. 2003. Predicting the impacts of climate change on the distribution of species: are bioclimate envelope models useful? Global Ecology and Biogeography 12:361-371.
38. Pigott, C. D., and J. P. Huntley, 1981. Factors controlling the distribution of Tilia cantata at the northern limits of its geographical range. III. Nature and causes of seed sterility. New Phytologist 87:817-839.
39. Rounsevell, M. D. A., et al. 2006. A coherent set of future land use change scenarios for Europe. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 114:57-68.
40. Sakamoto, Y., M. Ishiguro, and G. Kitagawa. 1986. Akaike information criterion statistics. D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.
41. Sala, O. E., et al. 2000. Global biodiversity scenarios for the year 2100. Science 287:1770-1774.
42. Schtickzelle, N., G. Mennechez, and M. Baguette, 2006. Dispersal depression with habitat fragmentation in the bog fritillary butterfly. Ecology 87:1057-1065.
43. Settele, J., et al. 2005. ALARM: Assessing LArge scale environmental Risks for biodiversity with tested Methods. GAIA - Ecological Perspectives in Science, Humanities, and Economics 14:69-72.
44. Spangenberg, J. H. 2007. Integrated scenarios for assessing biodiversity risks. Sustainable Development 15:343-356.
45. Stireman, J. O., et al. 2005. Climatic unpredictability and parasitism of caterpillars: Implications of global warming. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (USA) 102: 17384-17387.
46. Thomas, C. D., E. J. Bodsworth, R. J. Wilson, A. D. Simmons, Z. G. Davies, M. Musche, and L. Conradt. 2001. Ecological and evolutionary processes at expanding range margins. Nature 411:577-581.
47. Thuiller, W., S. Lavorel, M. B. Araujo, M. T. Sykes, and I. C. Prentice. 2005. Climate change threats to plant diversity in Europe. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (USA) 102:8245-8250.
48. Warren, M. S., et al. 2001. Rapid responses of British butterflies to opposing forces of climate and habitat change. Nature 414:65-69.
49. Winder, M., and D. E. Schindler. 2004. Climate change uncouples trophic interactions in an aquatic ecosystem. Ecology 85:2100-2106.