Auto-adaptive search capabilities of the new borg MOEA: A detailed comparison on alternative product family design problem formulations

12th AIAA Aviation Technology, Integration and Operations (ATIO) Conference and 14th AIAA/ISSMO Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization Conference

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages

  Woodruff, Matthew J ^a   Hadka, David M ^a   Reed, Patrick M ^a   Simpson, Timothy W ^a  

^a PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPLEX ENGINEERED SYSTEMS; COMPUTATIONAL POWER; GLOBAL SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; HIGH-PERFORMANCE COMPUTING; OPTIMIZATION ALGORITHMS; PRODUCT FAMILY DESIGN; RIGOROUS EVALUATION; SEARCH CAPABILITIES;

AVIATION; GALLIUM ALLOYS; OPTIMIZATION; PRODUCT DESIGN;

EVOLUTIONARY ALGORITHMS;

EID: 84880807102     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (32)

1. Venkataraman, S. and Haftka, R. T., "Structural Optimization Complexity: what has Moore's Law done for us?" Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, Vol. 28, 2004, pp. 275-287.
2. Balling, R., "Design by shopping: A new paradigm?" Proceedings of the Third World Congress of Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization (WCSMO-3), 1999, pp. 295-297.
3. Kollat, J. B. and Reed, P. M., "A Computational Scaling Analysis of Multiobjective Evolutionary Algorithms in Long-Term Groundwater Monitoring Applications, " Advances in Water Resources, Vol. 30, No. 3, 2007, pp. 408-419.
4. Simpson, T. W. and Martins, J. R. R. A., "Multidisciplinary Design Optimization for Complex Engineered Systems: Report from a National Science Foundation Workshop, " ASME Journal of Mechanical Design, Vol. 133, No. 10, 2011.
5. Bloebaum, C. and McGowan, A.-M., "Design of Complex Engineered Systems, " Journal of Mechanical Design, Vol. 132, 2010.
6. Brockhoff, D., Friedrich, T., Hebbinghaus, N., Klein, C., Neumann, F., and Zitzler, E., "Do Additional Objectives Make a Problem Harder?" Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference (GECCO '07), London, England, 2007, pp. 765-772.
7. Brockhoff, D., Friedrich, T., Hebbinghaus, N., Klein, C., Neumann, F., and Zitzler, E., "On the effects of adding objectives to plateau functions. " IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, Vol. 13, No. 3, 2009, pp. 591-603.
8. Simpson, T. W., Chen, W., Allen, J. K., and Mistree, F., "Conceptual Design of a Family of Products Through the Use of the Robust Concept Exploration Method, " 6th AIAA/USAF/NASA/ISSMO Symposium on Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization, AIAA, Bellevue, WA, 1996, pp. 1535-1545.
9. Shah, R., Simpson, T., and Reed, P., "Many-Objective Evolutionary Optimisation and Visual Analytics for Product Family Design, " Multi-objective Evolutionary Optimisation for Product Design and Manufacturing, edited by L. Wang and et al, Springer-Verlag, London, 2011, pp. 137-159.
10. Simpson, T. W., A CONCEPT EXPLORATION METHOD FOR PRODUCT FAMILY DESIGN, Ph.D. thesis, Georgia Institute of Technology, 1998.
11. Coello Coello, C. A., Van Veldhuizen, D. A., and Lamont, G. B., Evolutionary Algorithms for Solving Multi-Objective Problems, Second Edition, Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2002.
12. Purshouse, R. C. and Fleming, P. J., "On the evolutionary optimization of many conflicting objectives, " IEEE Transac-tions on Evolutionary Computation, Vol. 11, No. 6, 2007, pp. 770-784.
13. Deb, K., Mohan, M., and Mishra, S., "Evaluating the "-domination based multiobjective evolutionary algorithm for a quick computation of Pareto-optimal solutions. " Evolutionary Computation Journal, Vol. 13, No. 4, 2005, pp. 501-525.
14. Hadka, D. and Reed, P., "Borg: An auto-adaptive many-objective evolutionary computing framework, " Evolutionary Computation, Vol. In-press, 2012.
15. Hadka, D. and Reed, P., "Diagnostic Assessment of Search Controls and Failure Modes in Many-Objective Evolutionary Optimization, " Evolutionary Computation, Vol. In Press, 2012.
16. Reed, P., Hadka, D., Herman, J., Kasprzyk, J., and Kollat, J., "Evolutionary Multiobjective Optimization in Water Resources: The Past, Present, and Future (Editor Invited Submission to 35th Anniversary Special Issue), " Advances in Water Resources, Vol. In-Press, 2012.
17. Hadka, D., Reed, P. M., and Simpson, T. W., "Diagnostic Assessment of the Borg MOEA for Many-Objective Product Family Design Problems, " Proceedings of the 2012 IEEE World Congress on Computational Intelligence, IEEE, 2012, pp. 986-995.
18. Sobol', I. M., "Global sensitivity indices for nonlinear mathematical models and their Monte Carlo estimates, " Mathe-matics and Computers in Simulation, Vol. 55, 2001, pp. 271-280.
19. Sobol', I. M. and Kucherenko, S. S., "Global sensitivity indices for nonlinear mathematical models, " Wilmott Magazine, Vol. 2, 2005, pp. 1-6.
20. Saltelli, A., "Making best use of model evaluations to compute sensitivity indices, " Computer Physics Communications, Vol. 145, 2002, pp. 280-297.
21. Purshouse, R. C. and Fleming, P. J., "Evolutionary many-objective optimisation: an exploratory analysis, " Congress on Evolutionary Computation (CEC 2003), Vol. 3, Dec. 2003, pp. 2066-2073.
22. Purshouse, R. C. and Fleming, P. J., "On the Evolutionary Optimization of Many Conflicting Objectives, " IEEE Trans-actions on Evolutionary Computation, Vol. 11, No. 6, 2007, pp. 770-784.
23. Hadka, D. and Reed, P., "Diagnostic Assessment of Search Controls and Failure Modes in Many-Objective Evolutionary Optimization, " Evolutionary Computation, 2012.
24. Saltelli, A., Ratto, M., Andres, T., Campolongo, F., Cariboni, J., Gatelli, D., Saisana, M., and Tarantola, S., Global Sensitivity Analysis: The Primer, Wiley, Jan. 2008.
25. Coello Coello, C. A., Lamont, G. B., and Van Veldhuizen, D. A., Evolutionary Algorithms for Solving Multi-Objective Problems, Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, New York, NY, USA, 2007.
26. Knowles, J. and Corne, D., "On Metrics for Comparing Non-Dominated Sets, " Congress on Evolutionary Computation (CEC 2002), Vol. 1, May. 2002, pp. 711-716.
27. While, L., Bradstreet, L., and Barone, L., "A fast way of calculating exact hypervolumes, " IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, Vol. 16, No. 1, 2012, pp. 86-95.
28. NASA, "GASP-General Aviation Synthesis Program, " Tech. Rep. NASA-CR-152303, National Aeronautics and Space Administration Ames Research Center, Moffet Field, California, 1978.
29. Messac, A., Martinez, M., and Simpson, T., "A penalty function for product family design using physical programming, " ASME Journal of mechanical design, Vol. 124, No. 2, 2002, pp. 164-172.
30. Woodruff, M., Reed, P., and Simpson, T., "Many Objective Visual Analytics: Rethinking the Design of Complex Engi-neered Systems, " Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, In-Revision.
31. Simpson, T. W. and D'Souza, B., "Assessing Variable Levels of Platform Commonality within a Product Family Using a Multiobjective Genetic Algorithm, " Concurrent Engineering: Research and Applications, Vol. 12, No. 2, 2004, pp. 119-130.
32. D'Souza, B. and Simpson, T. W., "A Genetic Algorithm Based Method for Product Family Design Optimization, " Engineering Optimization, Vol. 35, No. 1, 2003, pp. 1-18.