Diagnostic assessment of the borg MOEA for many-objective product family design problems

2012 IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation, CEC 2012

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages

  Hadka, David ^a   Reed, Patrick M ^a   Simpson, Timothy W ^a  

^a The Pennsylvania State University   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BENCH-MARK PROBLEMS; DYNAMIC ALLOCATIONS; GENERAL AVIATION; GLOBAL SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; MULTI OBJECTIVE EVOLUTIONARY ALGORITHMS; MUTATION OPERATORS; PARAMETER RANGE; PARAMETER SENSITIVITIES; PROBLEM SPACE; PRODUCT FAMILY DESIGN;

EVOLUTIONARY ALGORITHMS; GALLIUM ALLOYS; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS;

PRODUCT DESIGN;

EID: 84866883070     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/CEC.2012.6256466     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (36)

1. S. Venkataraman and R. T. Haftka, "Structural optimization complexity: What has moore's law done for us?" Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, vol. 28, no. 6, pp. 375-387, 2004.
2. R. J. Balling, J. T. Taber, M. R. Brown, and K. Day, "Multiobjective urban planning using genetic algorithms," Journal of Urban Planning and Development, vol. 125, no. 2, pp. 86-99, 1999.
3. J. B. Kollat and P. M. Reed, "A computational scaling analysis of multi-objective evolutionary algorithms in long-term groundwater monitoring applications," Advances in Water Resources, vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 408-419, 2007.
4. T. W. Simpson and J. R. R. A. Martins, "The future of multidisciplinary design optimization (mdo): Advancing the design of complex engineered systems," National Science Foundation, Arlington, VA, Tech. Rep., 2010.
5. C. L. Bloebaum and A. M. R. McGowan, "Design of compex engineered systems," Journal of Mechanical Design, vol. 132, no. 12, pp. 1-2, 2010.
6. C. A. Coello Coello, G. B. Lamont, and D. A. Van Veldhuizen, Evolutionary Algorithms for Solving Multi-Objective Problems. New York, NY, USA: Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, 2007.
7. R. C. Purshouse and P. J. Fleming, "On the evolutionary optimization of many conflicting objectives," IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, vol. 11, no. 6, pp. 770-784, 2007.
8. D. Hadka and P. Reed, "Diagnostic assessment of search controls and failure modes in many-objective evolutionary optimization," Evolutionary Computation, 2012.
9. P. M. Reed, D. M. Hadka, J. D. Herman, J. R. Kasprzyk, and J. B. Kollat, "Evolutionary multiobjective optimization in water resources: The past, present, and future," Advances in Water Resources, 2012.
10. D. Hadka and P. Reed, "Borg: An auto-adaptive many-objective evolutionary computing framework," Evolutionary Computation (In Review), 2012.
11. D. E. Goldberg, Design of Innovation: Lessons From and For Competent Genetic Algorithms. Norwell, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2002.
12. I. M. Sobol', "Global sensitivity indices for nonlinear mathematical models and their monte carlo estimates," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation, vol. 55, pp. 271-280, 2001.
13. A. Saltelli, "Making best use of model evaluations to compute sensitivity indices," Computer Physics Communications, vol. 145, pp. 280-297, 2002.
14. I. M. Sobol' and S. S. Kucherenko, "Global sensitivity indices for nonlinear mathematical models," Wilmott magazine, vol. 2, pp. 1-6, 2005.
15. T. W. Simpson, W. Chen, J. K. Allen, and F. Mistree, "Conceptual design of a family of products through the use of the robust concept exploration method," in 6th AIAA/USAF/NASA/ISSMO Symposium on Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization, vol. 2, 1996, pp. 1535-1545.
16. T. W. Simpson, "Methods for optimizing product platforms and product families: Overview and classification," in Product Platform and Product Family Design: Methods and Applications. New York: Springer, 2005, pp. 133-156.
17. B. D'Souza and T. W. Simpson, "A genetic algorithm based method for product family design optimization," Engineering Optimization, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 1-18, 2003.
18. T. W. Simpson and B. D'Souza, "Assessing variable levels of platform commonality within a product family using a multiobjective genetic algorithm," Concurrent Engineering: Research and Applications, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 119-130, 2004.
19. R. Shah, P. M. Reed, and T. Simpson, "Many-objective evolutionary optimization and visual analytics for product family design," Multi-objective Evolutionary Optimisation for Product Design and Manufacturing, 2011.
20. J. B. Kollat and P. M. Reed, "Comparison of multi-objective evolutionary algorithms for long-term monitoring design," Advances in Water Resources, vol. 29, no. 6, pp. 792-807, 2006.
21. K. Deb, M. Mohan, and S. Mishra, "A fast multi-objective evolutionary algorithm for finding well-spread Pareto-optimal solutions," Kanpur Genetic Algorithms Laboratory (KanGAL), KanGAL Report No. 2003002, 2003.
22. M. Laumanns, L. Thiele, K. Deb, and E. Zitzler, "Combining convergence and diversity in evolutionary multi-objective optimization," Evolutionary Computation, vol. 10, no. 3, 2002.
23. J. Horn, "The nature of niching: Genetic algorithms and the evolution of optimal, cooperative populations," Ph.D. dissertation, University of Illinois, 1995.
24. S. W. Mahfoud, "Niching methods for genetic algorithms," Ph.D. dissertation, University of Illinois, 1995.
25. Y. Tang, P. Reed, and T. Wagener, "How effective and efficient are multiobjective evolutionary algorithms at hydrologic model calibration?" Hydrology and Earth System Science, vol. 10, pp. 289-307, 2006.
26. R. J. Moral, D. Sahoo, and G. S. Dulikravich, "Multi-objective hybrid evolutionary optimization with automatic switching," in 11th AIAA/ISSMO Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization Conference, Portsmouth, VA, Sept. 2006.
27. J. A. Vrugt and B. A. Robinson, "Improved evolutionary optimization from genetically adaptive multimethod search," Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 104, no. 3, pp. 708-711, 2007.
28. J. A. Vrugt, B. A. Robinson, and J. M. Hyman, "Self-adaptive multi-method search for global optimization in real-parameter spaces," IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 243-259, April 2009.
29. K. Deb and R. B. Agrawal, "Simulated binary crossover for continuous search space," Indian Institute of Technology, Kanpur, UP, India, Tech. Rep. IITK/ME/SMD-94027, Nov. 1994.
30. R. Storn and K. Price, "Differential evolution - a simple and efficient heuristic for global optimization over continuous spaces," Journal of Global Optimization, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 341-359, 1997.
31. K. Deb, D. Joshi, and A. Anand, "Real-coded evolutionary algorithms with parent-centric recombination," Computational Intelligence, Proceedings of the World on Congress on, vol. 1, pp. 61-66, 2002.
32. S. Tsutsui, M. Yamamura, and T. Higuchi, "Multi-parent recombination with simplex crossover in real coded genetic algorithms," in Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference (GECCO 1999), 1999.
33. H. Kita, I. Ono, and S. Kobayashi, "Multi-parental extension of the unimodal normal distribution crossover for real-coded genetic algorithms," in Congress on Evolutionary Computation, 1999, pp. 1581-1588.
34. N. Srinivas and K. Deb, "Multiobjective optimization using nondominated sorting in genetic algorithms," Evolutionary Computation, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 221-248, 1994.
35. A. Saltelli, M. Ratto, T. Andres, F. Campolongo, J. Cariboni, D. Gatelli, M. Saisana, and S. Tarantola, Global Sensitivity Analysis: The Primer. Wiley, Jan. 2008.
36. C. M. Fonseca and P. J. Fleming, "On the performance assessment and comparison of stochastic multiobjective optimizers," in Parallel Problem Solving from Nature (PPSN IV). London, UK: Springer-Verlag, 1996, pp. 584-593.