Writing biology with mutant mice: The monstrous potential of post genomic life

Geoforum

Volumn 48, Issue , 2013, Pages 268-278

  Davies, Gail ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EXETER   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Complexity; Excess; Functional genomics; Genetics; Monstrosity; Mutant mice

Indexed keywords

GENE; GENETICS; GENOMICS; RODENT; TOPOLOGY;

MAMMALIA; MUS;

EID: 84880792708     PISSN: 00167185     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2011.03.004     Document Type: Article

References (83)

1. Abbott A. Geneticists prepare for deluge of mutant mice. Nature News 2004, 432:541.
2. Anker S., Nelkin D. The Molecular Gaze: Art in the Genetic Age 2004, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, New York.
3. Austin C., Battey J., Bradley A., Bucan M., Capecchi M., Collins F. The knockout mouse project. Nature Genetics 2004, 36:921-924.
4. Bacon F. Advancement of Learning 1605, Kessinger Publishing, Whitefish, Montana, (original 1605).
5. Baker S. The Postmodern Animal 2000, Reaktion Books, London.
6. Balling R., Brown S., Hrabé de Angelis M., Justice M., Nadeau J., Peters J. Great times for mouse genetics: getting ready for large-scale ENU-mutagenesis. Mammalian Genome 2000, 11(7):471.
7. Balmer B. Managing mapping in the human genome project. Social Studies of Science 1996, 26(3):531-573.
8. Barry A. Political Machines: Governing a Technological Society 2001, Athlone Press, London.
9. Barthold S., Borowsky A., Brayton C., Bronson R., Cardiff R., Griffey S., Ince T., Yu Nikitin A., Sundberg J., Valli T., Ward J. From whence will they come? - a perspective on the acute shortage of pathologists in biomedical research. Journal of Veterinary Diagnostic Investigation 2007, 19(4):455-456.
10. Beck J., Lloyd S., Hafezparast M., Lennon-Pierce M., Eppig J., Festing M., Fisher E. Genealogies of mouse inbred strains. Nature Genetics 2000, 24:23-25.
11. Beckers J., Wurst W., Hrabé de Angelis M. Towards better mouse models: enhanced genotypes, systemic phenotyping and envirotype modelling. Nature Reviews Genetics 2009, 10:371-380.
12. Berry R. Town mouse, country mouse: adaptation and adaptability in Mus domesticus (M. musculus domesticus). Mammal Review 2008, 11(3):91-136.
13. Botting F. Metaphors and monsters. Journal for Cultural Research 2003, 7(4):339-365.
14. Boursot P., Auffray J., Britton-Davidian J., Bonhomme F. The evolution of house mice. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 1993, 24:119-152.
15. Brown S., Balling R. Systematic approaches to mouse mutagenesis. Current Opinion in Genetics and Development 2001, 11(3):268-273.
16. Brown S., Chambon P., Hrabé de Angelis M. EMPReSS: standardized phenotype screens for functional annotation of the mouse genome. Nature Genetics 2005, 37:1155.
17. Burt J. Rat 2006, Reaktion Books, London.
18. Canguilhem G., Jaeger T. Monstrosity and the monstrous. Diogenes 1962, 10:27-42.
19. Chouard T. Evolution: revenge of the hopeful monster. Nature 2010, 463:864-867.
20. Clark, N., 2005. Facing Disaster: Dynamic Instability and Exorbitant Ethics. Paper Presented at Complexity, Science and Society Conference, Lancaster. (accessed 10.05.10). http://www.lancs.ac.uk/ias/researchgroups/complexity/liverpoolconference.htm.
21. Clayton B. The human genome project: an increasingly elusive 'human nature'. Semiotica 2005, 155(1):249-258.
22. Coetzee J.M. Elizabeth Costello 2003, Secker and Warburg, London.
23. Collins F., Rossant J., Wurst W. A mouse for all reasons - International Knockout Consortium. Cell 2007, 128:9-13.
24. Cook-Deegan R. The Gene Wars 1994, WW Norton, NewYork.
25. Crabbe J.C., Wahlsten D., Dudek B.C. Genetics of mouse behaviour: interactions with laboratory environment. Science 1999, 284:1670-1672.
26. Crawley J. What's Wrong with My Mouse? Behavioral Phenotyping of Transgenic and Knockout Mice 2007, Wiley-Interscience, Hoboken, NJ.
27. Crowcroft P. Mice All Over 1966, Foulis, London.
28. Daston L., Park K. Wonders and the Order of Nature 1150-1750 1998, Zone Books, New York.
29. Davies G. A geography of monsters?. Geoforum 2003, 34(4):409-412.
30. Davies G. Captivating behaviour: mouse models, experimental genetics and reductionist returns in the neurosciences. Nature after the Genome 2010, 53-72. Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford. S. Parry, J. Dupré (Eds.).
31. Davies, G., in press. What is a humanized mouse? Remaking the species and spaces of translational medicine. Body and Society.
32. Davisson M. FIMRe: Federation of International Mouse Resources: global networking of resource centers. Mammalian Genome 2006, 17(5):363-364.
33. Deleuze G. Francis Bacon 2005, Continuum Books, London.
34. Derrida J. Limited Inc 1988, Northwestern University Press, Evanston, IL.
35. Derrida J. Some statements and truisms about neo-logisms, Newisms, postisms, parasitisms, and other small seismisms. The State of Theory 1990, 63-95. Stanford University Press, Stanford. D. Carrol (Ed.).
36. Derrida J. Spectres of Marx 1994, Routledge, London.
37. Derrida J. Passages - from traumatism to promise. Points. Interviews 1974-1994 1995, 372-395. Stanford University Press, Stanford. E. Weber (Ed.).
38. Derrida J. Of Grammatology 1998, John Hopkins University Press, Baltimore.
39. Derrida J. The aforementioned so-called human genome. Negotiations 2002, 199-215. Stanford University Press, Stanford. E. Rottenberg (Ed.).
40. Dixon D. The blade and the claw: science, art and the creation of the lab-borne monster. Social and Cultural Geography 2008, 9(6):671-692.
41. Ellman M. Writing like a rat. Critical Quarterly 2004, 46(4):59-76.
42. Evans E.P. The Criminal Prosecution and Capital Punishment of Animals 1906, William Heinemann, London.
43. Foucault M. Abnormal: Lectures at the Collège de France 1974-1975 2003, Picador, New York.
44. Franklin S. The cyborg embryo: our path to transbiology. Theory, Culture and Society 2006, 23:167-187.
45. Freeman B. 'Frankenstein' with Kant: a theory of monstrosity, or the monstrosity of theory. SubStance 1987, 16(1):21-31.
46. Gondo Y. Trends in large-scale mouse mutagenesis: from genetics to functional genomics. Nature Reviews Genetics 2008, 9:803-810.
47. Grimm G. A mouse for every gene. Science 2006, 312(5782):1862-1866.
48. Hacking I. The self-vindication of the laboratory sciences. Science as Practice and Culture 1992, 29-64. Chicago University Press, Chicago. A. Pickering (Ed.).
49. Haraway D. The promises of monsters: a regenerative politics for inappropriate/d others. Cultural Studies 1992, 63-124. Routledge, London. L. Grossberg, C. Nelson, P. Treichler (Eds.).
50. Haraway D. Modest_Witness@Second_Millenium.FemaleMan©_Meets_Oncomouse™: Feminism and Technoscience 1997, Routledge, London.
51. Haraway D. When Species Meet 2008, University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis.
52. Haraway D. When species meet: staying with the trouble. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 2010, 28(1):53-55.
53. Hrabé de Angelis M., Flaswinkel H., Fuchs H., Rathkolb B., Soewarto D., Marschall S. Genome-wide, large-scale production of mutant mice by ENU mutagenesis. Nature Genetics 2000, 25:444-447.
54. Jasanoff J. Clones and critics in the age of biocapital. Biosocieties 2006, 1:266-269.
55. Justice M. Removing the cloak of invisibility: phenotyping the mouse. Disease Models and Mechanisms 2008, 1:109-112.
56. Kay L. Who Wrote the Book of Life? A History of the Genetic Code 2000, Stanford University Press, Stanford.
57. Keller E. The Century of the Gene 2002, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
58. Leonelli S. Bio-ontologies as tools for integration in biology. Biological Theory 2008, 3(1):7-11.
59. Lezaun J. The risk regulation of 'frontier research': the case of gene therapy. Anticipating Risks in the 21st Century 2010, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. B. Hutter (Ed.).
60. Milburn C. Monsters in Eden: Darwin and Derrida. MLN 2003, 118:603-621.
61. Morgan H., Beck T., Blake A., Gates H., Adams N., Debouzy G., Leblanc S., Lengger C., Maier H., Melvin D., Meziane H., Richardson D., Wells S., White J., Wood J., The EUMODIC Consortium, Hrabé de Angelis M., Brown S., Hancock J., Mallon A. EuroPhenome: a repository for high-throughput mouse phenotyping data. Nucleic Acids Research 2010, 38(Database issue):D577-D585.
62. Morris R. Developments of a water-maze procedure for studying spatial learning in the rat. Journal of Neuroscience Methods 1984, 11(1):47-60.
63. Neocleous M. The Monstrous and the Dead: Burke, Marx, Fascism 2005, University of Wales Press, Cardiff.
64. Pickstone J. Ways of Knowing: A New History of Science, Technology, and Medicine 2001, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
65. Qiu J. Animal research: mighty mouse. Nature 2006, 444:814-816.
66. Rabinow P. Essays on the Anthropology of Reason 1996, Princeton University Press, Princeton.
67. Rabinow P. French DNA: Trouble in Purgatory 1999, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
68. Rader K. Making Mice. Standardizing Animals for American Biomedical Research, 1900-1955 2004, Princeton University Press, Princeton.
69. Ritvo H. The Platypus and the Mermaid, and other Figments of the Classifying Imagination 1998, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
70. Robins R. Inventing Oncomice: making natural animal, research tool and invention cohere. Genomics, Society and Policy 2008, 4(2):21-35.
71. Robinson V., Morton D., Anderson D., Carver J., Francis R., Hubrecht R., Jenkins E., Mathers K. Refinement and reduction in production of genetically modified mice. Sixth report of the BVAAWF/FRAME/RSPCA/UFAW joint working group on refinement. Laboratory Animals 2003, 37:1-51.
72. Rosenthal N., Brown S. The mouse ascending: perspectives for human-disease models. Nature Cell Biology 2007, 9:993-999.
73. Ruddick S. Domesticating monsters: cartographies of difference and the emancipatory city. The Emancipatory City? Paradoxes and Possibilities 2004, 23-39. Sage Publications Ltd., London. L. Lees (Ed.).
74. Russell W., Burch R. The Principles of Humane Experimental Technique 1959, Methuen, London.
75. Sabroe I., Dockrell D., Vogel S., Renshaw S., Whyte M., Dower S. Identifying and hurdling obstacles to translational research. Nature Reviews Immunology 2007, 7:77-82.
76. Schlick T. The critical collaboration between art and science: an experiment on a bird in the air pump and the ramifications of genomics for society. Leonardo 2005, 38(4):323-329.
77. Shildrick M. Embodying the Monster: Encounters with the Vulnerable Self 2002, Sage Publications Ltd., London.
78. Shostak S. Locating gene-environment interaction: at the intersections of genetics and public health. Social Science and Medicine 2003, 56(11):2327-2342.
79. Sunder Rajan K. Biocapital: The Constitution of Postgenomic Life 2006, Duke University Press, Durham, NC.
80. Turney J. Frankenstein's Footsteps: Science, Genetics and Popular Culture 1998, Yale University Press, New Haven.
81. Valdar W., Solberg L., Gauguier D., Cookson W., Rawlins N., Mott R., Flint J. Genetic and environmental effects on complex traits in mice. Genetics 2006, 174:959-984.
82. White S. Dreamwork as etymology. Dreaming 1999, 9(1):11-21.
83. Wynne B. Reflexing complexity: post-genomic knowledge and reductionist returns in public science. Theory, Culture and Society 2005, 22:67-94.