Utilization of carbon dioxide from coal-based power plants as a heat transfer fluid for electricity generation in enhanced geothermal systems (EGS)

Energy

Volumn 57, Issue , 2013, Pages 505-512

  Ram Mohan, Arun ^a   Turaga, Uday ^b   Shembekar, Vishakha ^c   Elsworth, Derek ^a   Pisupati, Sarma V ^a  

^a PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b ADI Analytics LLC   (United States)

^c Omkar Scientific Solutions LLC   (United States)

Author keywords

Carbon dioxide sequestration; Electricity; Enhanced geothermal systems; IGCC; Organic Rankine cycle

Indexed keywords

ARID REGIONS; COAL GASIFICATION PLANTS; ELECTRIC POWER GENERATION; ELECTRICITY; FLUIDS; GEOTHERMAL FIELDS; HEAT EXCHANGERS; HEAT TRANSFER; RANKINE CYCLE;

CARBON DIOXIDE SEQUESTRATION; COAL BASED POWER PLANTS; ENHANCED GEOTHERMAL SYSTEMS; IGCC; INTEGRATED GASIFICATION COMBINED CYCLE PLANTS; ORGANIC RANKINE CYCLE(ORC); ORGANIC RANKINE CYCLES; SIMULTANEOUS EXTRACTIONS;

CARBON DIOXIDE;

CARBON DIOXIDE; CARBON SEQUESTRATION; COAL-FIRED POWER PLANT; ELECTRICITY GENERATION; GEOTHERMAL SYSTEM; HEAT TRANSFER; HIGH PRESSURE; THERMODYNAMICS;

EID: 84880699685     PISSN: 03605442     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2013.05.047     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Mock J.E., Tester J.W., Wright P.M. Geothermal energy from the earth: Its potential impact as an environmentally sustainable resource. Annual Review of Energy and the Environment 1997, 22:305-356.
2. Brasz J., Holdmann G. Power production from a moderate-temperature geothermal resource. Geothermal Resources Council Transactions 2005, 29:729-733.
3. The Future of Geothermal Energy. Impact of Enhanced Geothermal Systems (EGS) on the United States in the 21st Century 2006, 372. Institute of Technology, Massachusetts.
4. Elsworth D. Theory of thermal recovery from a spherically stimulated hot dry rock reservoir. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth 1989, 94(B2):1927-1934.
5. Sanyal S.K., Butler S.J. An analysis of power generation prospects from enhanced geothermal systems. Geothermal Resources Council Transaction 2005, 29.
6. Polsky Yarom, Capuano Louis, Finger John, Huh Michael, Knudsen Steve, Chip Mansure A.J., et al. Enhanced Geothermal Systems (EGS) Well Construction Technology Evaluation Report December 2008, 108. Sandia National Laboratories.
7. Benzie S, Burge P, Dobson A. Towards a Moni-diameter well - advances in expanding tubular technology. Proc. SPE European Petroleum Conference 2000, SPE 65164, Paris, 2000.
8. Lohbeck WCM. Method of completing an uncased section of a borehole, United States Patent 5366012, 1993.
9. Aladeitan, Mariam Y., Adejoh, Zakariah A. Expandable tubular technologies 'Technology gaps and the way forward'. Global Journal of Researches in Engineering Chemical Engineering 2011, 11(7):1-8.
10. Annual US Geothermal Power Production and Development Report April 2012; Geothermal Energy Association, p. 372.
11. Sanyal S.K. Levelizee cost of geothermal power - how sensitive is it?. GRC Transactions 2005, 29:459-465.
12. DiPippo R. Geothermal power plants: principles, applications and case studies 2005, Elsevier Advanced Technology, Oxford, England.
13. DiPippo R. Small geothermal power plants: design, performance and economics. GHC Bulletin 1999, 1-8.
14. Lai N.A., Wendland M., Fischer J. Working fluids for high-temperature organic Rankine cycles. Energy 2011, 36(1):199-211.
15. Saleh B., Koglbauer G., Wendland M., Fischer J. Working fluids for low-temperature organic Rankine cycles. Energy 2007, 32(7):1210-1221.
16. Brasz Lars J., Bilbow William M. Ranking of working fluids for organic Rankine cycle applications. International Refrigeration and Air Conditioning Conference, Purdue 2004, 722-729.
17. Schuster A., Karellas S., Kakaras E., Spliethoff H. Energetic and economic investigation of Organic Rankine Cycle applications. Applied Thermal Engineering 2009, 29(8-9):1809-1817.
18. Heberle F., Preißinger M., Brüggemann D. Zeotropic mixtures as working fluids in organic Rankine cycles for low-enthalpy geothermal resources. Renewable Energy 2012, 37(1):364-370.
19. Angelino G., Colonna di Paliano P. Multicomponent working fluids for organic Rankine Cycles (ORCs). Energy 1998, 23(6):449-463.
20. Chen H., Goswami D.Y., Stefanakos E.K. Areview of thermodynamic cycles and working fluids for the conversion of low-grade heat. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 2010, 14(9):3059-3067.
21. Liu B.-T., Chien K.-H., Wang C.-C. Effect of working fluids on organic Rankine cycle for waste heat recovery. Energy 2004, 29(8):1207-1217.
22. Sotirios K., Andreas S. Supercritical fluid parameters in organic Rankine cycle applications. International Journal of Thermodynamics 2010, 11(3):101-108.
23. Chen H., Goswami D.Y., Rahman M.M., Stefanakos E.K. Asupercritical Rankine cycle using zeotropic mixture working fluids for the conversion of low-grade heat into power. Energy 2011, 36(1):549-555.
24. Mikielewicz D., Mikielewicz J. Athermodynamic criterion for selection of working fluid for subcritical and supercritical domestic micro CHP. Applied Thermal Engineering 2010, 30(16):2357-2362.
25. Madhawa Hettiarachchi H.D., Golubovic M., Worek W.M., Ikegami Y. Optimum design criteria for an Organic Rankine cycle using low-temperature geothermal heat sources. Energy 2007, 32(9):1698-1706.
26. Guo T., Wang H.X., Zhang S.J. Fluids and parameters optimization for a novel cogeneration system driven by low-temperature geothermal sources. Energy 2011, 36(5):2639-2649.
27. Guo T., Wang H.X., Zhang S.J. Selection of working fluids for a novel low-temperature geothermally-powered ORC based cogeneration system. Energy Conversion and Management 2011, 52(6):2384-2391.
28. Siddiqi M.A., Atakan B. Alkanes as fluids in Rankine cycles in comparison to water, benzene and toluene. Energy 2012, 45(1):256-263.
29. Schuster A., Karellas S., Aumann R. Efficiency optimization potential in supercritical Organic Rankine Cycles. Energy 2010, 35(2):1033-1039.
30. US Greenhouse Gas Inventory Report April 2012, US Environmental Protection Agency, Washington DC. http://epa.gov/climatechange/emissions/usinventoryreport.html.
31. Kramer D. Scientists poke holes in carbon dioxide sequestration. Physics Today 2012, 65(8):22-24.
32. The future of coal - options for a carbon constrained world 2007, 192. Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
33. Buhre B.J.P., Elliott L.K., Sheng C.D., Gupta R.P., Wall T.F. Oxy-fuel combustion technology for coal-fired power generation. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science 2005, 31(4):283-307.
34. Longwell J.P., Rubin E.S., Wilson J. Coal: energy for the future. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science 1995, 21(4):269-360.
35. 2 capture technology-The U.S. Department of Energy's Carbon Sequestration Program. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control 2008, 2(1):9-20.
36. Elsworth D. Acomparative evaluation of the parallel flow and spherical reservoir models of HDR geothermal systems. Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research 1990, 44:283-293.
37. Kabe T., Ishihara A., Qian E.W., Sutrisna I.P., Kabe Y. Studies in surface science and catalysis. Coal and coal-related compounds. Structure, Reactivity and Catalytic Reactions 2004, 150.