The new development cooperation landscape: Actors, approaches, architecture

Journal of International Development

Volumn 25, Issue 6, 2013, Pages 769-786

  Gore, Charles ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GLASGOW   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Aid; Development cooperation; Global partnership; South South cooperation

Indexed keywords

AID; BOTTOM-UP APPROACH; INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION; LANDSCAPE PLANNING;

EID: 84880658924     PISSN: 09541748     EISSN: 10991328     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jid.2940     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Adugna A, 2009. How much of official development assistance is earmarked? CFP Working Paper No. 2. World Bank: Washington DC.
2. Adugna A, Castro R, Gamarra B, Migliorisi S, 2011. Finance for development: trends and options in a changing landscape. CFP Working Paper No. 8. World Bank: Washington DC.
3. Beeson M, Bell S. 2009. The G20 and international economic governance: hegemony, collectivism or both? Global Governance 15: 67-86.
4. Cammack P. 2012. The G20, the crisis and the rise of global developmental liberalism. Third World Quarterly 33 (1): 1-16.
5. Carbone M. 2012. Beyond aid: policy coherence and Europe's development policy. In Carbonnier G. (ed.) International Development Policies: Aid, Emerging Economies and Global Policies., Palgrave Macmillan: Houndmills, Basingstoke, Palgrave Macmillan: Houndmills, Basingstoke, and New York.
6. Chandy L, Kharas H. 2011. Why can't we all just get along? The practical limits to international development cooperation. Journal of International Development 23: 739-751.
7. European Commission 2006. The European Consensus on Development. Office for Official Publications of the European Commission: Luxembourg.
8. Eyben R. 2012. Struggles in Paris: the DAC and the purposes of development aid. European Journal of Development Research 25 (1): 78-91.
9. Eyben R, Savage L. 2013. Emerging and submerging powers: imagined geographies in the new development partnership at the Busan Fourth High Level Forum. Journal of Development Studies 49 (4): 457-469.
10. Development Initiatives 2012. Data and Guides: Official Development Assistance (ODA). Available at: http://www.devinit.org/wp-content/uploads/di-data-guides-oda-09-10-12-E.pdf. [accessed on 26 June 2013].
11. Girishankar N. 2009, Innovating developing finance: from financing sources to financial solutions. CFP Working Paper Series No. 1. World Bank: Washington DC.
12. GPEDC 2013a. Second Meeting of the Steering Committee, Bali, Indonesia, 23-24 March 2013: Summary. Available at http://www.effectivecooperation.org/files/Summary%20-%20Global%20Partnership%20Steering%20Committee%20-%20Bali%2023-24%20March%202013%20%28Final%29.pdf. [accessed on 26 June 2013]
13. GPEDC 2013b. Guide to the Monitoring Framework of the Global Partnership: Preliminary Version for Consultation. Available at: http://www.effectivecooperation.org/files/2013%20busan%20global%20monitoring%20guidance.pdf. [accessed on 26 June 2013].
14. Gore C. 2013a. Northern crises and Southern development: what's new in development studies in UK? The Broker. Available at http://www.thebrokeronline.eu/Articles/Northern-Crises-and-Southern-Development. [accessed on 26 June 2013]
15. Gore C. 2013b. Beyond the romantic violence of the MDGs: development, aid and human rights. In Langford M. Sumner A, Yasmin A (eds.). MDGs and Human Rights: Past, Present and Future. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.
16. Greenhill R, Prizzon A. 2012. Who foots the bill after 2015? What new trends in development finance mean for the post-MDGs. Working Paper 360. ODI: London.
17. Greenhill R, Prizzon A, Rogerson A. 2013. The age of choice: developing countries in the new aid landscape. Working Paper 364. ODI: London.
18. Hulme D. 2009. Global poverty reduction and the Millennium Development Goals: a short history of the world's biggest promise. Working Paper 100. Brooks World Poverty Institute: Manchester.
19. Isenman P, Shakow A. 2010. Donor schizophrenia and aid effectiveness: the role of global funds. IDS Practice Paper 5. Institute for Development Studies: Brighton.
20. Kharas H, Makino K, Jung W. 2011. (eds.). Catalyzing Development: A New Vision for Aid. The Brookings Institute, Washington DC.
21. Killen B, Rogerson A. 2010. Global governance for international development: who's in charge? Development Brief Issue 2/2010. OECD Development Cooperation Directorate: Paris.
22. Kim S, Lightfoot S. 2011. Does 'DAC-ability' really matter? the emergence of non-DAC donors: introduction to policy arena. Journal of International Development 23: 711-721.
23. Martin M, Watts R, Rabinowitz G. 2012. Monitoring implementation of the Busan Partnership Agreement: why 'global light' and country focussed must work together effectively. Available at: http://www.ukan.org.uk/fileadmin/user_upload/monitoring-the-busan-agreement-april-18-2012_1_.pdf. [accessed 26 June 2013]
24. Mawdsley E, Savage L, and Kim S-M. 2013. A 'post-aid' world? Paradigm shift in foreign aid and development cooperation at the 2011 Busan High Level Forum. The Geographical Journal. DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-4959.2012.00490.x
25. Nunnenkamp P, Thiele R. 2013. Financing for development: the gap between words and deeds since Monterrey. Development Policy Review 31 (1): 75-98.
26. st Century: The Contribution of Development Cooperation. OECD: Paris.
27. OECD 2010. DAC mandate 2011-2015.DCD/DAC (2010)34/FINAL.
28. OECD 2011a. Busan Partnership for Effective Development Cooperation. OECD: Paris.
29. OECD 2011b. Aid Effectiveness 2005-2010: Progress in Implementing the Paris Declaration. OECD: Paris.
30. OECD 2012a. New directions in DAC measurement and monitoring of external development finance. DCD/DAC (2012) 48/REV2.
31. OECD 2012b. Strategy for Development. Adopted at the Meeting of the OECD Council at Ministerial Level, Paris, 23-24 May 2012. Available at: http://www.oecd.org/development/50452316.pdf [accessed on 26 June 2013].
32. OECD 2013. Loan concessionality in DAC statistics. DCD/DAC(2013)2.
33. Open Forum for CSO Development Effectiveness 2010. Istanbul Principles for Development Effectiveness. Available at: http://cso-effectiveness.org/istanbul-principles, 067 [accessed 26 June 2013].
34. Open Forum for CSO Development Effectiveness. 2011. The Siem Reap CSO Consensus on the International Framework for CSO Development Effectiveness. Available at: http://cso-effectiveness.org/InternationalFramework [accessed on 26 June 2013].
35. Severino J-M, Ray O. 2009. The end of ODA: death and rebirth of a global public policy. 167. Centre for Global Development: Washington DC.
36. South Centre. 2008. Developing country perspectives on the role of the Development Cooperation Forum: building strategic approaches to enhancing multilateral development cooperation. SC/GGDP/AN/GEG/10. Available at: http://www.southcentre.org/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=865 [accessed on 26 June 2013].
37. UN. 2010. Development Cooperation for the MDGs: Maximizing Results. United Nations: New York.
38. UN. 2012. Trends and progress in international development cooperation. Report of the Secretary-General for Consideration by the Development Cooperation Forum. E/2012/78: Available at: http://www.un.org/ga/search/view_doc.asp?symbol=E/2012/78 [accessed 26 June 2013].
39. UN ECOSOC 2011. Mutual accountability for development cooperation results: where next? Available at: http://www.un.org/en/ecosoc/newfunct/pdf/dcf_mutual_accountability_busan_study%2829jun%29.pdf [accessed on 26 June 2013].
40. UN ECOSOC 2012. Report of the 2012 ECOSOC Development Cooperation Forum. Available at: http://www.un.org/en/ecosoc/julyhls/pdf12/dcf_report_11_feb_rev.pdf [accessed on 26 June 2013].
41. UNCTAD. 2008. The Least Developed Countries Report 2008: Growth, Poverty and the Terms of Development Partnership. United Nations: New York and Geneva.
42. UNCTAD. 2010a. The Least Developed Countries Report 2010: Towards a New International Development Architecture for LDCs. United Nations: New York and Geneva.
43. UNCTAD. 2010b. Economic Development in Africa Report 2010: South-South Cooperation: Africa and the New Forms of Development Partnership. United Nations: New York and Geneva.
44. UNCTAD 2011. The Least Developed Countries Report 2011: The Potential Role of South-South Cooperation in Inclusive and Sustainable Development. United Nations: New York and Geneva.
45. Vestergaard J, Wade RH. 2013 Protecting power: how western states retain the dominant voice in the World Bank's governance. World Development 46: 153-164.
46. Wade R. 2011. Emerging world order? From multipolarity to multilateralism in the G20, the World Bank and the IMF. Politics and Society 39 (3): 347-378.
47. Wood B, Betts J, Etta F, Gayfer J, Kabell D, Ngwira N, Sagasti F, Samaranayake M. 2011. The Evaluation of the Paris Declaration: Final Report Phase 2. Danish Institute for International Studies: Copenhagen.
48. Working Party on Aid Effectiveness 2011. Unlocking the potential of South-South Co-operation: policy recommendations from the Task Team on South-South Co-operation. In OECD DAC 2013. Busan High Level Forum on Aid Effectiveness Proceedings; pp. 291-295. Available at: http://www.oecd.org/dac/effectiveness/Final%20file.pdf [accessed 26 June 2013].
49. World Bank.2012. Global Monitoring Report 2012: Food, Nutrition and the Millennium Development Goals. World Bank: Washington DC.
50. World Bank 2013. Global Monitoring Report 2013: Rural-urban Dynamics and the Millennium Development Goals. World Bank: Washington DC.
51. Zimmermann F, Smith K. 2011. More actors, more money, more ideas for international development cooperation. Journal of International Development 23: 722-738.