Emerging and Submerging Powers: Imagined Geographies in the New Development Partnership at the Busan Fourth High Level Forum

Journal of Development Studies

Volumn 49, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 457-469

  Eyben, Rosalind ^a   Savage, Laura ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SUSSEX   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

FUTURE PROSPECT; GEOPOLITICS; INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION; NEGOTIATION PROCESS; PARTNERSHIP APPROACH; POLITICAL DISCOURSE; POLITICAL POWER;

PUSAN [PUSAN (ADS)]; PUSAN [SOUTH KOREA]; SOUTH KOREA;

EID: 84875955930     PISSN: 00220388     EISSN: 17439140     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00220388.2012.733372     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. ACP (Africa CSO Platform) (2012) Whose power matters? Review of civil society gains and losses at 4th High Level Forum on Aid Effectiveness
2. Anderson, B. 1994. Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origins and Spread of Nationalism, London: Verso.
3. Armijo, R. 2007. The BRICs countries (Brazil, Russia, India, and China) as analytical category: mirage or insight?. Asian Perspective, 31(4): 7-42.
4. Barder, O. 2011. "Brian Atwood (OECD-DAC Chair) reflects on Busan progress". Accessed athttp://blogs.cgdev.org/globaldevelopment/2011/12/brian-atwood-oecd-dac-chair-reflects-on-busan-progress.php
5. Bräutigam, D. 1998. Chinese Aid and African Development, New York and London: St Martin's Press.
6. Bräutigam, D. 2009. China's challenge to the international aid architecture. World Politics Review, 1(4): 1-10.
7. Cammack, P. 2011. The G20, the Crisis, and the rise of global developmental liberalism. Third World Quarterly, 33(1): 1-16.
8. De Paula, S. and Dymski, G. 2005. Reimagining Growth: Towards a Renewal of Development Theory, London and New York: Zed Books.
9. ECOSOC (United Nations Economic and Social Council). 2008. Background study for the Development Cooperation Forum: Trends in South-South and Triangular Development Cooperation, New York: United Nations.
10. Eyben, R. and Lister, S. Why and how to aid middle income countries. IDS Working Paper 231. Brighton: IDS.
11. Ghimire, K. B. 2001. Regional tourism and South-South economic cooperation. The Geographical Journal, 167: 99-110.
12. Gray, P. 2011. Looking 'The Gift' in the mouth: Russia as a donor. Anthropology Today, 27(2): 5-8.
13. Hagen, J. 2003. Redrawing the imagined map of Europe: The rise and fall of the 'center'. Political Geography, 22: 489-517.
14. Hart, G. 2001. Development critiques in the 1990s: cul de sacs and promising paths. Progress in Human Geography, 25(4): 649-658.
15. Jenkins, R. 2008. Social Identity, Abingdon, UK: Taylor and Francis.
16. Kapferer, B. 2006. "Situations, crisis and the anthropology of the concrete". In The Manchester School: Practice and Ethnographic Praxis in Anthropology, Edited by: Evans, T. and Handleman, D. New York: Berghahn Books.
17. Leider, S. and Klingebiel, S. 2011. "Busan, the broker". Accessed atwww.thebrokeronline.eu/
18. McGee, R. and García Heredia, I. Paris in Bogotá: Applying the aid effectiveness agenda in Colombia. IDS Working Paper 342. Brighton: IDS.
19. Manning, R. The DAC as a central actor in development policy issues: Experiences over the past four years. Discussion Paper, German Development Institute. Bonn: GDI.
20. Mawdsley, E. 2012. From Recipients to Donors: The Emerging Powers and the Changing Development Landscape, London: Zed Books.
21. Mawdsley, E. 2011. The changing geographies of foreign aid and development cooperation: Contributions from Gift Theory. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 37(2): 256-272.
22. Mawdsley, E. and McCann, G. 2011. India and Africa: Changing Geographies of Power and Development, Oxford: Famahu.
23. Mohan, G. and Power, M. 2009. Africa, China and the 'new' economic geography of development. Singapore Journal of Tropical Geography, 30(1): 24-28.
24. Mosse, D. 2011. "Social analysis as corporate product". Edited by: Mos17se, D. 81-102. Oxford: Berghahn Press. Adventures in Aidland: The Anthropology of Professionals in International Development
25. Oh-Seok, H. and Arnold, D. 2010. Emerging Asian Approaches to Development Cooperation, Seoul: KDI and The Asia Foundation.
26. O'Sullivan, K. 2011. History and the development aid debate in the Republic of Ireland. Policy & practice: A Development Education Review, 12: 110-123. Accessed athttp://www.developmenteducationreview.com/issue12-perspectives6
27. Pieterse, J. N. 2011. Global rebalancing: crisis and the East-South turn. Development and Change,: 22-48.
28. Rist, G. 2002. The History of Development, London: Zed Books.
29. Said, E. 1978. Orientalism, London: Penguin.
30. Schirm, S. 2009. Leaders in need of followers: Emerging powers in global governance. European Journal of International Relations, 16(2): 197-221.
31. Shankland, A. and Constantine, J. Brazilian imaginaries of Africa and social technology transfers. IDS Working Paper. Brighton: IDS.
32. Sidaway, J. 2011. "Geographies of development: New maps, new visions?". In The Professional Geographer (Online)
33. Walz, J. and Ramachandran, V. Brave new world: A literature review of emerging donors and the changing nature of foreign assistance. Center for Global Development Working Paper 273. Accessed athttp://www,cgdev.org/content/publications/detail/1425691
34. Wood, B., Betts, J., Etta, F., Gayfer, J., Kabell, D., Ngwira, N., Sagasti, F. and Samaranayake, M. 2011. The Evaluation of the Paris Declaration, Final Report, Phase 2, Copenhagen: Danish Institute for International Studies.
35. Woods, N. 2008. Whose aid? Whose influence? China, emerging donors and the silent revolution in development assistance. International Affairs, 84(6): 1205-1221.
36. Xu, J. Aid as a catalyst for economic transformation: a wider vision for the future of aid. Paper presented at the Busan Youth Forum Presentation. Busan. Accessed athttp://www.globaleconomicgovernance.org/wp-content/uploads/Jiaju_XU_2011_Busan_Youth_Forum_final.pdf