Tailored breast cancer screening program with microdose mammography, us, and mr imaging : Short-term results of a pilot study in 40-49-year-old wome

Radiology

Volumn 268, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 347-355

  Venturini, Elena ^a   Losio, Claudio ^a   Panizza, Pietro ^c   Rodighiero, Maria Grazia ^a   Fedele, Isabella ^d   Tacchini, Simona ^a   Schiani, Elena ^a   Ravelli, Silvia ^a   Cristel, Giulia ^a   Panzeri, Marta Maria ^a   De Cobelli, FRAsco ^a,b   Maschio, Alessandro Del ^a,b  

^a SAN RAFFAELE HOSPITAL   (Italy)

^b VITA SALUTE SAN RAFFAELE UNIVERSITY   (Italy)

^c NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE   (Italy)

^d Humanitas Gavazzeni Hospital   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGE; ARTICLE; BREAST CANCER; CANCER CHEMOTHERAPY; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; CANCER RISK; CANCER SCREENING; CANCER STAGING; CLINICAL TRIAL; COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; DIAGNOSTIC TEST ACCURACY STUDY; ECHOMAMMOGRAPHY; FEASIBILITY STUDY; FEMALE; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; INTRADUCTAL CARCINOMA; INVASIVE CARCINOMA; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PARTIAL MASTECTOMY; PILOT STUDY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIATION DOSE; RISK ASSESSMENT; SENTINEL LYMPH NODE;

ADULT; BREAST NEOPLASMS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MAMMOGRAPHY; MASS SCREENING; MIDDLE AGED; NEOPLASM STAGING; PILOT PROJECTS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK FACTORS; ULTRASONOGRAPHY, MAMMARY;

EID: 84880651929     PISSN: 00338419     EISSN: 15271315     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1148/radiol.13122278     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Jemal A, Siegel R, Xu J, Ward E. Cancer statistics, 2010. CA Cancer J Clin 2010; 60(5):277-300.
2. Nelson HD, Tyne K, Naik A, et al. Screening for Breast Cancer: Systematic Evidence Review Update for the US Preventive Services Task Force. Evidence review update no. 74. AHRQ publication no. 10-05142-EF-1. Rockville, Md: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, 2009.
3. Distante V, Ciatto S, Frigerio A, et al. Recommendations of a national Italian consensus conference on the opportunity of extending screening service by mammography to 40-49 and 70-74 years of age women [in Italian]. Epidemiol Prev 2007;31(1):15-22.
4. Smith RA, Saslow D, Sawyer KA, et al. American Cancer Society guidelines for breast cancer screening: Update 2003. CA Cancer J Clin 2003;53(3):141-169.
5. Hendrick RE, Smith RA, Rutledge JH 3rd, Smart CR. Benefit of screening mammography in women aged 40-49: A new metaanalysis of randomized controlled trials. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 1997 (22):87-92.
6. Berg WA. Tailored supplemental screening for breast cancer: What now and what next? AJR Am J Roentgenol 2009;192(2):390-399.
7. Stomper PC, D'Souza DJ, DiNitto PA, Arredondo MA. Analysis of parenchymal density on mammograms in 1353 women 25-79 years old. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1996;167(5):1261-1265.
8. Boyd NF, Guo H, Martin LJ, et al. Mammographic density and the risk and detection of breast cancer. N Engl J Med 2007;356(3):227-236.
9. Nothacker M, Duda V, Hahn M, et al. Early detection of breast cancer: Benefits and risks of supplemental breast ultrasound in asymptomatic women with mammographically dense breast tissue. a systematic review. BMC Cancer 2009;9:335.
10. Hooley RJ, Greenberg KL, Stackhouse RM, Geisel JL, Butler RS, Philpotts LE. Screening US in patients with mammographically dense breasts: Initial experience with Connecticut Public Act 09-41. Radiology 2012;265(1):59-69.
11. Saslow D, Boetes C, Burke W, et al. American Cancer Society guidelines for breast screening with MRI as an adjunct to mammography. CA Cancer J Clin 2007;57(2):75-89.
12. Sardanelli F, Podo F, Santoro F, et al. Multicenter surveillance of women at high genetic breast cancer risk using mammography, ultrasonography, and contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (the high breast cancer risk italian 1 study): Final results. Invest Radiol 2011;46(2):94-105.
13. Gail MH, Brinton LA, Byar DP, et al. Projecting individualized probabilities of developing breast cancer for white females who are being examined annually. J Natl Cancer Inst 1989;81(24):1879-1886.
14. American College of Radiology. American College of Radiology Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS). 4th ed. Reston, Va: American College of Radiology, 2003.
15. American Joint Committee on Cancer. Chapter 32. In: AJCC Cancer Staging Manual. 7th ed. Berlin, Germany: Springer, 2010.
16. Galea MH, Blamey RW, Elston CE, Ellis IO. The Nottingham Prognostic Index in primary breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 1992;22(3):207-219.
17. Moss S, Waller M, Anderson TJ, Cuckle H; Trial Management Group. Randomised controlled trial of mammographic screening in women from age 40: Predicted mortality based on surrogate outcome measures. Br J Cancer 2005;92(5):955-960.
18. Perry N, Broeders M, de Wolf C, Törnberg S, Holland R, von Karsa L. European guidelines for quality assurance in breast cancer screening and diagnosis. 4th ed. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communites, 2006.
19. AIRTUM Working Group, Crocetti E, Buzzoni C. New incidence and mortality data. 2003-2005 [in Italian]. Epidemiol Prev 2009;33(1-2 Suppl 2):e1-e3, e5-e26.
20. Ventura L, Giorgi D, Giordano L, Ponti A, Michienzi A, Federici A. I Programmi Di Screening in Italia 2010. Screening del tumore della mammella. Osservatorio Nazionale Screening site. http://www.studiosesto. com/ons/index.php?option=com-con tent&view=article&id=88&Itemid=43. Published December 2010. Updated February 18, 2011. Accessed March 24, 2012.
21. Cole EB, Toledano AY, Lundqvist M, Pisano ED. Comparison of radiologist performance with photon-counting full-field digital mammography to conventional fullfield digital mammography. Acad Radiol 2012;19(8):916-922.
22. Weigel S, Girnus R, Czwoydzinski J, Decker T, Spital S, Heindel W. Digital mammography screening: Average glandular dose and first performance parameters. Rofo 2007;179(9):892-895.
23. Moss SM, Cuckle H, Evans A, et al. Effect of mammographic screening from age 40 years on breast cancer mortality at 10 years' follow-up: A randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2006;368(9552):2053-2060.
24. Weigert J, Steenbergen S. The Connecticut experiment: The role of ultrasound in the screening of women with dense breasts. Breast J 2012;18(6):517-522.
25. Corsetti V, Houssami N, Ferrari A, et al. Breast screening with ultrasound in women with mammography-negative dense breasts: Evidence on incremental cancer detection and false positives, and associated cost. Eur J Cancer 2008;44(4):539-544.
26. Ekwueme DU, Gardner JG, Subramanian S, Tangka FK, Bapat B, Richardson LC. Cost analysis of the National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program: Selected states, 2003 to 2004. Cancer 2008;112(3):626-635.
27. Malmgren JA, Parikh J, Atwood MK, Kaplan HG. Impact of mammography detection on the course of breast cancer in women aged 40-49 years. Radiology 2012;262(3): 797-806.
28. Kremer ME, Downs-Holmes C, Novak RD, et al. Neglecting to screen women between the ages of 40 and 49 years with mammography: What is the impact on breast cancer diagnosis? AJR Am J Roentgenol 2012;198(5):1218-1222.