Determining adverse events in patients with neck pain receiving orthopaedic manual physiotherapy: A pilot and feasibility study

Physiotherapy Canada

Volumn 65, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 255-265

  Carlesso, Lisa C ^a   Macdermid, Joy C ^b,c   Santaguida, Lina ^a   Thabane, Lehana ^a  

^a MCMASTER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b MCMASTER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^c ST JOSEPH S HEALTH CENTRE   (Canada)

Author keywords

Adverse events; Feasibility study; Neck manipulation; Pilot study

Indexed keywords

EID: 84880644947     PISSN: 03000508     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3138/ptc.2012-28     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Kerry R, Taylor AJ. Cervical arterial dysfunction assessment and manual therapy. Man Ther. 2006;11(4):243-53.http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.math.2006.09.006. Medline:17074613
2. Kerry R, Taylor AJ. Cervical arterial dysfunction: knowledge and reasoning for manual physical therapists. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2009;39(5):378-87.Medline:19411768
3. Rubinstein S, Côté P. Mild mechanical traumas are possible risk factors for cervical artery dissection. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2007;24(2-3):319.http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000106520.Medline:17675838
4. Rubinstein SM, Leboeuf-Yde C, Knol DL, et al. Predictors of adverse events following chiropractic care for patients with neck pain. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2008;31(2):94-103.http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jmpt.2007.12.006.Medline:18328935
5. Rubinstein SM, Leboeuf-Yde C, Knol DL, et al. The benefits outweigh the risks for patients undergoing chiropractic care for neck pain: a prospective, multicenter, cohort study. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2007;30(6):408-18. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jmpt.2007.04.013.Medline:17693331
6. Thiel HW, Bolton JE, Docherty S, et al. Safety of chiropractic manipulation of the cervical spine: a prospective national survey. Spine. 2007;32(21):2375-8, discussion 2379.http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181557bb1 Medline:17906581
7. Cassidy JD, Boyle E, Côté P, et al. Risk of vertebrobasilar stroke and chiropractic care: results of a population-based case-control and case-crossover study. Spine. 2008;33(4 Suppl):S176-83.http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181644600.Medline:18204390
8. Rothwell DM, Bondy SJ, Williams JI, et al. Chiropractic manipula- tion and stroke: a population-based case-control study. Stroke. 2001;32(5):1054-60.http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/01.STR.32.5.1054. Medline:11340209
9. Carlesso LC, Macdermid JC, Santaguida LP. Standardization of adverse event terminology and reporting in orthopaedic physical therapy-applications to the cervical spine. J Ortho Sports Phys. 2010;40:455-63.
10. Carnes D, Mullinger B, Underwood M. Defining adverse events in manual therapies: a modified Delphi consensus study. Man Ther.2010;15(1):2-6.http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.math.2009.02.003.Medline:19443262
11. Carlesso LC, Cairney J, Dolovich L, et al. Defining adverse events in manual therapy: an exploratory qualitative analysis of the patient perspective. Man Ther. 2011;16(5):440-6.http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.math.2011.02.001.Medline:21377403
12. Rajendran D, Bright P, Bettles S, et al. What puts the adverse in 'adverse events'? Patients' perceptions of post-treatment experiences in osteopathy-a qualitative study using focus groups. Man Ther. 2012;17(4):305-11.http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.math.2012.02.011.Medline:22425134
13. Weissman JS, Schneider EC, Weingart SN, et al. Comparing patient- reported hospital adverse events with medical record review: do patients know something that hospitals do not? Ann Intern Med. 2008;149(2):100-8.Medline:18626049
14. Basch E, Jia X, Heller G, et al. Adverse symptom event reporting by patients vs clinicians: relationships with clinical outcomes. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2009;101(23):1624-32.http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djp386.Medline:19920223
15. McKay SD, MacDermid JC, Roth JH, et al. Assessment of complications of distal radius fractures and development of a complication checklist. J Hand Surg Am. 2001;26(5):916-22.http://dx.doi.org/10.1053/jhsu.2001.26662.Medline:11561246
16. Carlesso LC, Gross AR, Santaguida PL, et al. Adverse events asso- ciated with the use of cervical manipulation and mobilization for the treatment of neck pain in adults: a systematic review. ManTher.2010;15(5):434-44.http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.math.2010.02.006. Medline:20227325
17. Thabane L, Ma J, Chu R, et al. A tutorial on pilot studies: the what, why and how. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2010;10(1):1.http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-10-1. Medline:20053272
18. Moore CG, Carter RE, Nietert PJ, et al. Recommendations for plan- ning pilot studies in clinical and translational research. Clin Transl Sci. 2011;4(5):332-7.http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-8062.2011.00347.x. Medline:22029804
19. Lancaster GA, Dodd S, Williamson PR. Design and analysis of pilot studies: recommendations for good practice. J Eval Clin Pract. 2004;10(2):307-12.http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.2002.384.doc.x.Medline:15189396
20. Shanyinde M, Pickering RM, Weatherall M. Questions asked and answered in pilot and feasibility randomized controlled trials. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2011;11(1):117.http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-11-117.Medline:21846349
21. Arain M, Campbell MJ, Cooper CL, et al. What is a pilot or feasibility study? A review of current practice and editorial policy. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2010;10(1):67.http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-10-67.Medline:20637084
22. Carlesso LC, MacDermid JC, Santaguida PL, et al. Beliefs and practice patterns in spinal manipulation and spinal motion palpation reported by Canadian manipulative physiotherapists. Physiother Can. 2012; 65(2):167-75.http://dx.doi.org/10.3138/ptc.2012-11
23. Gibbons P, Tehan P. Spinal manipulation: Indications, risks and benefits. J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2001;5(2):110-9.http://dx.doi.org/10.1054/jbmt.2000.0208
24. Canadian Physiotherapy Association-Orthopaedic Division. Clinical technique manuals, Level 4/5. 2006.
25. Canadian Physiotherapy Association-Orthopaedic Division. Theory manuals I & II. Diploma of Advanced Manual and Manipulative Physiotherapy. 2005.
26. Hing WA, Reid DA, Monaghan M. Manipulation of the cervical spine. Man Ther. 2003;8(1):2-9.http://dx.doi.org/10.1054/math.2002.0487.Medline:12635631
27. Bostick GP, Walton DM, Schneider GM, et al. Barriers and facilitators to clinician engagement in physiotherapy research. Quebec (QC): JPDL International; 2012.
28. Kongsved SM, Basnov M, Holm-Christensen K, et al. Response rate and completeness of questionnaires: a randomized study of Internet versus paper-and-pencil versions. J Med Internet Res. 2007;9(3):e25.http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/jmir.9.3.e25.Medline:17942387
29. Ritter P, Lorig K, Laurent D, et al. Internet versus mailed question- naires: a randomized comparison. J Med Internet Res. 2004;6(3):e29.http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/jmir.6.3.e29.Medline:15471755
30. Edwards PJ, Roberts I, Clarke MJ, et al. Methods to increase response to postal and electronic questionnaires. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009;(3):MR000008.Medline:19588449
31. Cagnie B, Vinck E, Beernaert A, et al. How common are side effects of spinal manipulation and can these side effects be predicted? Man Ther. 2004;9(3):151-6.http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.math.2004.03.001.Medline:15245709
32. Leaver AM, Maher CG, Herbert RD, et al. A randomized controlled trial comparing manipulation with mobilization for recent onset neck pain. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2010;91(9):1313-8.http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2010.06.006.Medline:20801246
33. Sweeney A, Doody C. Manual therapy for the cervical spine and re-ported adverse effects: a survey of Irish manipulative physiothera- pists. Man Ther. 2010;15(1):32-6.http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.math.2009.05.007.Medline:19632881