Defining adverse events in manual therapy: An exploratory qualitative analysis of the patient perspective

Manual Therapy

Volumn 16, Issue 5, 2011, Pages 440-446

  Carlesso, Lisa C ^a   Cairney, John ^a   Dolovich, Lisa ^a   Hoogenes, Jennifer ^a  

^a MCMASTER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Adverse events; Definitions; Manual therapy; Patients

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ADVERSE OUTCOME; AGED; ARTICLE; CANADA; CHIROPRACTIC; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISEASE DURATION; DISEASE SEVERITY; EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE; FEMALE; HEADACHE; HUMAN; KNEE PAIN; LOW BACK PAIN; MALE; MANIPULATIVE MEDICINE; NECK PAIN; OSTEOPATHIC MEDICINE; PATIENT ATTITUDE; PHYSIOTHERAPY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS; SEMI STRUCTURED INTERVIEW; SHOULDER PAIN; THEMATIC ANALYSIS; TREATMENT RESPONSE; WRIST INJURY;

ADULT; AGED; CANADA; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; ONTARIO; PATIENT ACCEPTANCE OF HEALTH CARE; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PATIENTS; PHYSICAL THERAPY MODALITIES;

EID: 80052030917     PISSN: 1356689X     EISSN: 15322769     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.math.2011.02.001     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Basch E., Iasonos A., McDonough T., Barz A., Culkin A., Kris M.G., et al. Patient versus clinician symptom reporting using the national cancer institute common terminology criteria for adverse events: results of a questionnaire-based study. Lance Oncol 2006, 7(11):903-909.
2. Basch E., Jia X., Heller G., Barz A., Sit L., Fruscione M., et al. Adverse symptom event reporting by patients vs clinicians: relationships with clinical outcomes. J Natl Cancer Inst 2009, 101(23):1624-1632.
3. Berlivet L. "Association or causation?" The debate on the scientific status of risk factor epidemiology, 1947-c. 1965. Clio Med 2005, 75:39-74.
4. Cagnie B., Vinck E., Beernaert A., Cambier D. How common are side effects of spinal manipulation and can these side effects be predicted?. Man Ther 2004, 9(3):151-156.
5. Carlesso L.C., Macdermid J.C., Santaguida L.P. Standardization of adverse event terminology and reporting in orthopaedic physical therapy-applications to the cervical spine. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2010, 40(8):455-463.
6. Carnes D., Mullinger B., Underwood M. Defining adverse events in manual therapies: a modified Delphi consensus study. Man Ther 2010, 15(1):2-6.
7. Charles C., Gafni A., Whelan T. Shared decision-making in the medical encounter: what does it mean? (or it takes at least two to tango). Soc Sci Med 1997, 44(5):681-692.
8. Entry-to-practice physiotherapy curriculum: content guidelines for canadian university programs: health quest consulting 2009, Council of Canadian Physiotherapy University Programs.
9. Creswell J.W. Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches 2009, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA. 3rd ed.
10. Ernst E. Life-threatening complications of spinal manipulation. Stroke 2001, 32(3):809-810.
11. Ernst E. Manipulation of the cervical spine: a systematic review of case reports of serious adverse events, 1995-2001. Med J Aust 2002, 176(8):376-380.
12. Ernst E. Cerebrovascular complications associated with spinal manipulation. Phys Ther Rev 2004, 9(1):5-15.
13. Hill A.B. The environment and disease: association or causation?. Proc R Soc Med 1965, 58:295-300.
14. Kundi M. Causality and the interpretation of epidemiologic evidence. Environ Health Perspect 2006, 114(7):969-974.
15. Kuper A., Reeves S., Levinson W. An introduction to reading and appraising qualitative research. BMJ 2008, 337:a288.
16. Long A.F., Esmonde L., Connolly S. A typology of negative responses: a case study of shiatsu. Complement Ther Med 2009, 17(3):168-175.
17. Macqueen K.M., McLellan E., Kay K., Milstein B. Codebook development for team based analysis in qualitative research. Cult Anthropol Methods 1998, 10(2):31-36.
18. Naranjo C.A., Busto U., Sellers E.M., Sandor P., Ruiz I., Roberts E.A., et al. A method for estimating the probability of adverse drug reactions. Clin Pharmacol Ther 1981, 30(2):239-245.
19. Neergaard M.A., Olesen F., Andersen R.S., Sondergaard J. Qualitative description - the poor cousin of health research?. BMC Med Res Methodol 2009, 9:52.
20. Neudorf K.A. Content analysis guidebook 2002, Sage Publications Inc., Thousand Oaks, CA.
21. Rubinstein S.M., Leboeuf-Yde C., Knol D.L., de Koekkoek T.E., Pfeifle C.E., van Tulder M.W. The benefits outweigh the risks for patients undergoing chiropractic care for neck pain: a prospective, multicenter, cohort study. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 2007, 30(6):408-418.
22. Sandelowski M. What's in a name? Qualitative description revisited. Res Nurs Health 2010, 33(1):77-84.
23. Shakir S.A., Layton D. Causal association in pharmacovigilance and pharmacoepidemiology: thoughts on the application of the Austin Bradford-Hill criteria. Drug Saf 2002, 25(6):467-471.
24. Thiel H.W., Bolton J.E., Docherty S., Portlock J.C. Safety of chiropractic manipulation of the cervical spine: a prospective national survey. Spine 2007, 32(21):2375-2378. discussion 2379.
25. Ward A.C. The role of causal criteria in causal inferences: Bradford Hill's "aspects of association" Epidemiol Perspect Innov 2009, 6:2.
26. Weissman J.S., Schneider E.C., Weingart S.N., Epstein A.M., David-Kasdan J., Feibelmann S., et al. Comparing patient-reported hospital adverse events with medical record review: do patients know something that hospitals do not?. Ann Intern Med 2008, 149(2):100-108.