-
1
-
-
58849098735
-
The design and interpretation of pilot trials in clinical research in critical care
-
McMaster Critical Care Interest Group 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181920e33. 19104228
-
McMaster Critical Care Interest Group. The design and interpretation of pilot trials in clinical research in critical care. DM Arnold KE Burns NK Adhikari ME Kho MO Meade DJ Cook, Crit Care Med 2009 37 Suppl 1 69 74 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181920e33 19104228
-
(2009)
Crit Care Med
, vol.37
, Issue.SUPPL. 1
, pp. 1969-74
-
-
Arnold, D.M.1
Burns, K.E.2
Adhikari, N.K.3
Kho, M.E.4
Meade, M.O.5
Cook, D.J.6
-
2
-
-
77249142355
-
A tutorial on pilot studies: The what, why and How
-
10.1186/1471-2288-10-1. 20053272
-
A tutorial on pilot studies: The what, why and How. L Thabane J Ma R Chu J Cheng A Ismaila LP Rios R Robson M Thabane CH Goldsmith, BMC Medical Research Methodology 2010 10 1 10.1186/1471-2288-10-1 20053272
-
(2010)
BMC Medical Research Methodology
, vol.10
, pp. 1
-
-
Thabane, L.1
Ma, J.2
Chu, R.3
Cheng, J.4
Ismaila, A.5
Rios, L.P.6
Robson, R.7
Thabane, M.8
Goldsmith, C.H.9
-
3
-
-
3042664421
-
Design and analysis of pilot studies: Recommendations for good practice
-
10.1111/j.2002.384.doc.x. 15189396
-
Design and analysis of pilot studies: recommendations for good practice. GA Lancaster S Dodd PR Williamson, J Eval Clin Pract 2004 10 307 12 10.1111/j.2002.384.doc.x 15189396
-
(2004)
J Eval Clin Pract
, vol.10
, pp. 307-12
-
-
Lancaster, G.A.1
Dodd, S.2
Williamson, P.R.3
-
4
-
-
0037125417
-
The continuing unethical conduct of underpowered clinical trials
-
10.1001/jama.288.3.358. 12117401
-
The continuing unethical conduct of underpowered clinical trials. SD Halpern JH Karlawish JA Berlin, JAMA 2002 288 358 62 10.1001/jama.288.3.358 12117401
-
(2002)
JAMA
, vol.288
, pp. 358-62
-
-
Halpern, S.D.1
Karlawish, J.H.2
Berlin, J.A.3
-
5
-
-
33646911919
-
Caution regarding the use of pilot studies to guide power calculations for study proposals
-
10.1001/archpsyc.63.5.484. 16651505
-
Caution regarding the use of pilot studies to guide power calculations for study proposals. HC Kraemer J Mintz A Noda J Tinklenberg JA Yesavage, Arch Gen Psychiatry 2006 63 484 9 10.1001/archpsyc.63.5.484 16651505
-
(2006)
Arch Gen Psychiatry
, vol.63
, pp. 484-9
-
-
Kraemer, H.C.1
Mintz, J.2
Noda, A.3
Tinklenberg, J.4
Yesavage, J.A.5
-
6
-
-
0037065574
-
Descriptive studies: What they can and cannot do
-
10.1016/S0140-6736(02)07373-7. 11809274
-
Descriptive studies: what they can and cannot do. DA Grimes KF Schulz, Lancet 2002 359 145 9 10.1016/S0140-6736(02)07373-7 11809274
-
(2002)
Lancet
, vol.359
, pp. 145-9
-
-
Grimes, D.A.1
Schulz, K.F.2
-
7
-
-
33846563409
-
Why Most Published Research Findings Are False
-
10.1371/journal.pmed.0020124. 16060722
-
Why Most Published Research Findings Are False. JPA Ioannidis, PLoS Med 2005 2 8 124 10.1371/journal.pmed.0020124 16060722
-
(2005)
PLoS Med
, vol.2
, Issue.8
, pp. 5124
-
-
Ioannidis, J.P.A.1
-
8
-
-
77955580610
-
Trials in Primary Care: Issues in the design of complex intervention
-
to appear. 20442193
-
Trials in Primary Care: issues in the design of complex intervention. GA Lancaster MJ Campbell S Eldridge A Farrin M Marchant S Muller R Perera TJ Peters AT Prevost G Rait, Statistical Methods in Medical Research 2010 to appear 20442193
-
(2010)
Statistical Methods in Medical Research
-
-
Lancaster, G.A.1
Campbell, M.J.2
Eldridge, S.3
Farrin, A.4
Marchant, M.5
Muller, S.6
Perera, R.7
Peters, T.J.8
Prevost, A.T.9
Rait, G.10
|