Dynamic ultra high speed scheimpflug imaging for assessing corneal biomechanical properties

Revista Brasileira de Oftalmologia

Volumn 72, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 99-102

  Ambrósio Jr , Renato ^a,b,c   Ramos, Isaac ^a,b   Luz, Allan ^b,c   Faria, Fernando Correa ^a,b   Steinmueller, Andreas ^c   Krug, Matthias ^c   Belin, Michael W ^d   Roberts, Cynthia Jane ^e  

^a Instituto de Olhos Renato Ambrosio   (Brazil)

^b Rio de Janeiro Corneal Tomography and Biomechanics Study Group   (Brazil)

^c Department of Ophthalmology ^*

^d UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA   (United States)

^e The Ohio State University   (United States)

Author keywords

Biomechanics; Cornea physiology; Corneal topography methods; Ocular methods; Tonometry

Indexed keywords

EID: 84880594873     PISSN: 00347280     EISSN: 19828551     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1590/S0034-72802013000200005     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Salomao MQ, Esposito A, Dupps WJ, Jr. Advances in anterior segment imaging and analysis. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2009;20(4):324-32.
2. Ambrosio R, Jr., Nogueira LP, Caldas DL, Fontes BM, Luz A, Cazal JO, et al. Evaluation of corneal shape and biomechanics before LASIK. Int Ophthalmol Clin. 2011;51(2):11-38.
3. Dupps WJ, Jr., Wilson SE. Biomechanics and wound healing in the cornea. Exp Eye Res. 2006;83(4):709-20.
4. Andreassen TT, Simonsen AH, Oxlund H. Biomechanical properties of keratoconus and normal corneas. Exp Eye Res. 1980;31(4):435-41.
5. Roberts C. Biomechanical customization: the next generation of laser refractive surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2005;31(1):2-5.
6. Liu J, Roberts CJ. Influence of corneal biomechanical properties on intraocular pressure measurement: quantitative analysis. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2005;31(1):146-55.
7. Congdon NG, Broman AT, Bandeen-Roche K, Grover D, Quigley HA. Central corneal thickness and corneal hysteresis associated with glaucoma damage. Am J Ophthalmol. 2006;141(5):868-75.
8. Kotecha A. What biomechanical properties of the cornea are relevant for the clinician? Surv Ophthalmol. 2007;52 Suppl 2:S109-14.
9. Brown KE, Congdon NG. Corneal structure and biomechanics: impact on the diagnosis and management of glaucoma. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2006;17(4):338-43.
10. Elsheikh A, Geraghty B, Rama P, Campanelli M, Meek KM. Characterization of age-related variation in corneal biomechanical properties. J R Soc Interface. 2010;7(51):1475-85.
11. Dupps WJ, Jr. Biomechanical modeling of corneal ectasia. J Refract Surg. 2005;21(2):186-90.
12. Carvalho LA, Prado M, Cunha RH, Costa Neto A, Paranhos A, Jr., Schor P, et al. Keratoconus prediction using a finite element model of the cornea with local biomechanical properties. Arq Bras Oftalmol. 2009;72(2):139-45.
13. Luce DA. Determining in vivo biomechanical properties of the cornea with an ocular response analyzer. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2005;31(1):156-62.
14. Knox Cartwright NE, Tyrer JR, Marshall J. Age-related differences in the elasticity of the human cornea. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011;52(7):4324-9.
15. Jaycock PD, Lobo L, Ibrahim J, Tyrer J, Marshall J. Interferometric technique to measure biomechanical changes in the cornea induced by refractive surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2005;31(1):175-84.
16. Scarcelli G, Pineda R, Yun SH. Brillouin optical microscopy for corneal biomechanics. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2012;53(1):185-90.
17. Dorronsoro C, Pascual D, Perez-Merino P, Kling S, Marcos S. Dynamic OCT measurement of corneal deformation by an air puff in normal and cross-linked corneas. Biomed Opt Express. 2012;3(3):473-87.
18. Grabner G, Eilmsteiner R, Steindl C, Ruckhofer J, Mattioli R, Husinsky W. Dynamic corneal imaging. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2005;31(1):163-74.
19. Bonatti JA, Bechara SJ, Carricondo PC, Kara-Jose N. Proposal for a new approach to corneal biomechanics: dynamic corneal topography. Arq Bras Oftalmol. 2009;72(2):264-7.
20. Ambrósio Jr R. Evidência Biomecânica do Crosslinking (CxL). Ectasia de Córnea com Fotografia de Scheimpflug em altíssima velocidade. Oftalmologia em Foco. 2012; 138: 31-32