AMIE: Association rule mining under incomplete evidence in ontological knowledge bases

WWW 2013 - Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on World Wide Web

Volumn , Issue , 2013, Pages 413-422

  Galárraga, Luis ^a   Teflioudi, Christina ^a   Hose, Katja ^b   Suchanek, Fabian M ^a  

^a MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR INFORMATICS   (Germany)

^b AALBORG UNIVERSITY   (Denmark)

Author keywords

ILP; Inductive logic programming; Rule mining

Indexed keywords

ILP; KNOWLEDGE BASIS; KNOWLEDGE BASIS (KBS); OPEN WORLD ASSUMPTION; ORDERS OF MAGNITUDE; RULE MINING; STATE OF THE ART; STATE-OF-THE-ART APPROACH;

DATA MINING; WORLD WIDE WEB;

INDUCTIVE LOGIC PROGRAMMING (ILP);

EID: 84880561534     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (37)

1. Z. Abedjan, J. Lorey, and F. Naumann. Reconciling ontologies and the web of data. In CIKM, 2012.
2. H. Adé, L. Raedt, and M. Bruynooghe. Declarative bias for specific-to-general ilp systems. Machine Learning, 20, 1995.
3. R. Agrawal, T. Imieliński, and A. Swami. Mining association rules between sets of items in large databases. In SIGMOD, 1993.
4. R. Agrawal, H. Mannila, R. Srikant, H. Toivonen, and A. I. Verkamo. Fast discovery of association rules. In Advances in knowledge discovery and data mining. 1996.
5. S. Auer, C. Bizer, G. Kobilarov, J. Lehmann, R. Cyganiak, and Z. G. Ives. DBpedia: A nucleus for a Web of open data. In ISWC, 2007.
6. Y. Chi, R. R. Muntz, S. Nijssen, and J. N. Kok. Frequent Subtree Mining - An Overview. Fundam. Inf., 66(1-2), 2004.
7. P. Cimiano, A. Hotho, and S. Staab. Comparing Conceptual, Divisive and Agglomerative Clustering for Learning Taxonomies from Text. In ECAI, 2004.
8. C. d'Amato, V. Bryl, and L. Serafini. Data-driven logical reasoning. In URSW, 2012.
9. C. d'Amato, N. Fanizzi, and F. Esposito. Inductive learning for the Semantic Web: What does it buy? Semant. web, 1(1,2), Apr. 2010.
10. J. David, F. Guillet, and H. Briand. Association Rule Ontology Matching Approach. Int. J. Semantic Web Inf. Syst., 3(2), 2007.
11. L. Dehaspe and H. Toironen. Discovery of relational association rules. In Relational Data Mining. Springer-Verlag New York, Inc., 2000.
12. L. Dehaspe and H. Toivonen. Discovery of frequent DATALOG patterns. Data Min. Knowl. Discov., 3(1), Mar. 1999.
13. B. Goethals and J. Van den Bussche. Relational Association Rules: Getting WARMER. In Pattern Detection and Discovery, volume 2447. Springer Berlin / Heidelberg, 2002.
14. G. A. Grimnes, P. Edwards, and A. D. Preece. Learning Meta-descriptions of the FOAF Network. In ISWC, 2004.
15. S. Hellmann, J. Lehmann, and S. Auer. Learning of OWL Class Descriptions on Very Large Knowledge Bases. Int. J. Semantic Web Inf. Syst., 5(2), 2009.
16. J. Hoffart, F. M. Suchanek, K. Berberich, and G. Weikum. YAGO2: a spatially and temporally enhanced knowledge base from Wikipedia. Artificial Intelligence Journal, 2013.
17. J. Jozefowska, A. Lawrynowicz, and T. Lukaszewski. The role of semantics in mining frequent patterns from knowledge bases in description logics with rules. Theory Pract. Log. Program., 10(3), 2010.
18. M. Kuramochi and G. Karypis. Frequent Subgraph Discovery. In ICDM. IEEE Computer Society, 2001.
19. J. Lehmann. DL-Learner: Learning Concepts in Description Logics. Journal of Machine Learning Research (JMLR), 10, 2009.
20. F. A. Lisi. Building rules on top of ontologies for the semantic web with inductive logic programming. TPLP, 8(3):271-300, 2008.
21. A. Maedche and V. Zacharias. Clustering Ontology-Based Metadata in the Semantic Web. In PKDD, 2002.
22. T. Mamer, C. Bryant, and J. McCall. L-modified ilp evaluation functions for positive-only biological grammar learning. In F. Zelezny and N. Lavrac, editors, Inductive logic programming, number 5194 in Lecture notes in artificial intelligence, pages 176-191. Springer-Verlag, Berlin / Heidelberg, Germany, 2008. Paper originally presented at the 18th International Conference, ILP 2008 Prague, Czech Republic, September 10-12 2008.
23. C. Matuszek, J. Cabral, M. Witbrock, and J. Deoliveira. An introduction to the syntax and content of Cyc. In AAAI Spring Symposium, 2006.
24. D. L. McGuinness, R. Fikes, J. Rice, and S. Wilder. An Environment for Merging and Testing Large Ontologies. In KR, 2000.
25. S. Muggleton. Inverse entailment and progol. New Generation Comput., 13(3&4), 1995.
26. S. Muggleton. Learning from positive data. In ILP. Springer-Verlag, 1997.
27. N. Nakashole, M. Sozio, F. Suchanek, and M. Theobald. Query-time reasoning in uncertain rdf knowledge bases with soft and hard rules. In Workshop on Very Large Data Search (VLDS) at VLDB, 2012.
28. V. Nebot and R. Berlanga. Finding association rules in semantic web data. Knowl.-Based Syst., 25(1), 2012.
29. T. Neumann and G. Weikum. RDF-3X: a RISC-style engine for RDF. Proc. VLDB Endow., 1(1), Aug. 2008.
30. N. F. Noy and M. A. Musen. PROMPT: Algorithm and Tool for Automated Ontology Merging and Alignment. In AAAI/IAAI. AAAI Press, 2000.
31. M. Richardson and P. Domingos. Markov logic networks. Machine Learning, 62(1-2), 2006.
32. S. Schoenmackers, O. Etzioni, D. S. Weld, and J. Davis. Learning first-order Horn clauses from web text. In EMNLP, 2010.
33. F. M. Suchanek, S. Abiteboul, and P. Senellart. PARIS: Probabilistic Alignment of Relations, Instances, and Schema. PVLDB, 5(3), 2011.
34. F. M. Suchanek, J. Hoffart, E. Kuzey, and E. Lewis-Kelham. YAGO2s: Modular High-Quality Information Extraction. In German Database Symposium (BTW), 2013.
35. F. M. Suchanek, G. Kasneci, and G. Weikum. Yago: a core of semantic knowledge. In WWW, 2007.
36. P.-N. Tan, V. Kumar, and J. Srivastava. Selecting the right interestingness measure for association patterns. In KDD, 2002.
37. J. Völker and M. Niepert. Statistical schema induction. In ESWC, 2011.