Association rule ontology matching approach

International Journal on Semantic Web and Information Systems

Volumn 3, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 27-49

  David, Jérôme ^a   Guillet, Fabrice ^a   Briand, Henri ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE NANTES   (France)

Author keywords

Data mining; Hierarchical model; Knowledge discovery; Ontologies; Semantic matching

Indexed keywords

ASSOCIATION RULES; DATA MINING; HIERARCHICAL SYSTEMS; SEMANTICS;

HIERARCHICAL MODEL; OWL ONTOLOGIES; RELEVANT TERMS; RULE ONTOLOGIES; SEMANTIC MATCHING; STATISTICAL MEASURES; TEXTUAL DOCUMENTS; TWO-HIERARCHY;

ONTOLOGY;

EID: 51849133039     PISSN: 15526283     EISSN: 15526291     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4018/jswis.2007040102     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Agrawal, R., Imielinski, T., & Swami, A. (1993). Mining association rules between sets of items in large databases. In Proceedings of the 1993 ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data (pp. 207-216). ACM Press.
2. Agrawal, R., & Srikant, R. (1994). Fast algorithms for mining association rules. In J. Bocca, M. Jarke, & C. Zaniolo (Eds.), In Proceedings of the 20th International Conference Very Large Data Bases (VLDB'94) (pp. 487-499). Morgan Kaufmann.
3. Ashpole, B., Ehrig, M., Euzenat, J., & Stukkenschmidt, H. (Eds.). (2005). Integrating ontologies. In Proceedings of the K-CAP 2005 Workshop on Integrating Ontologies (Vol. 156). CEUR Workshop Proceedings.
4. Blanchard, J., Guillet, F., Gras, R., & Briand, H. (2005). Using information-theoretic measures to assess association rule interestingness. In Proceedings of the 15th IEEE International Conference on Data Mining (ICDM'05) (pp. 66-73). IEEE Computer Society.
5. Blanchard, J., Kuntz, P., Guillet, F., & Gras, R. (2003). Implication intensity: From the basic statistical definition to the entropic version. In H. Bozdogan (Ed.), Statistical data mining and knowledge discovery, 28 (pp. 473-485). CRC Press.
6. Castano, S., Ferrara, A., & Montanelli, S. (2006). Matching ontologies in open networked systems: Techniques and applications. Journal on Data Semantics, 3870, 25-63.
7. Ceglar, A., & Roddick, J. F. (2006). Association mining. ACM Computing Surveys, 38(2), 5.
8. Daille, B. (2003). Conceptual structuring through term variations. In F. Bond, A. Korhonen, D. MacCarthy, & A. Villacicencio (Eds.), In Proceedings of the ACL 2003 Workshop on Multiword Expressions: Analysis, Acquisition and Treatment (pp. 9-16).
9. Do, H., & Rahm, E. (2002). Coma - A system for flexible combination of schema matching approaches. In Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Very Large Data Bases (VLDB '02) (pp. 610-621).
10. Doan, A., Madhavan, J., Domingos, P., & Halevy, A. (2002). Learning to map between ontologies on the Semantic Web. In Proceeding of the 11th International WWW Conference (WWW'02) (pp. 662-673). ACM Press.
11. Doan, A., Madhavan, J., Domingos, P., & Halevy, A. (2004). Ontology matching: A machine learning approach. In S. Staab & R. Studer (Eds.), Handbook on Ontologies in Information Systems (pp. 397-416). Springer-Velag.
12. Euzenat, J., & Valtchev, P. (2003). An integrative proximity measure for ontology alignment. In Proceedings of the Semantic Integration Workshop, 2nd International Semantic Web Conference (ISWC-03).
13. Fayyad, U. M., Piatetsky-Shapiro, G., Smyth, P., & Uthurusamy, R. (Eds.). (1996). Advances in knowledge discovery and data mining. AAAI/MIT Press.
14. Fürst, F., & Trichet, F. (2005). Axiom-based ontology matching. In Proceedings of the 3rd international conference on Knowledge capture (K-CAP '05) (pp. 195-196). ACM Press.
15. Giunchiglia, F., Shvaiko, P., & Yatskevich, M. (2004). S-match: An algorithm and an implementation of semantic matching. In Proceedings of the European Semantic Web Symposium (LNCS 3053) (pp. 61-75).
16. Gras, R., et al. (1996). L'implication statistique, une nouvelle méthode exploratoire de données. La pensée sauvage.
17. Hoshiai, T., Yamane, Y., Nakamura, D., & Tsuda, H. (2004). A semantic category matching approach to ontologies alignment. In Proceedings of the 3rd international workshop on Evaluation of Ontology Based Tools (EON2004).
18. Hu, W., Jian, N., Qu, Y., & Wang, Y. (2005). Gmo: A graph matching for ontologies. In Proceedings of the K-CAP 2005Workshop on Integrating Ontologies (pp. 41-48).
19. Ichise, R., Hamasaki, M., & Takeda, H. (2004). Discovering relationships among catalogs. In E. Suzuki & S. Arikawa (Eds.), In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Discovery Science (DS'04) (Vol. 3245, LNCS) (pp. 371-379). Springer.
20. Kalfoglou, Y., & Hu, B. (2005). Cms: Crosi mapping system - Results of the 2005 ontology alignment contest. In Proceedings of the K-CAP 2005Workshop on Integrating Ontologies (pp. 77-85).
21. Kalfoglou, Y., & Schorlemmer, M. (2003). Ontology mapping: The state of the art. Knowledge Engineering Review, 18(1), 1-31.
22. Lacher, M. S., & Groh, G. (2001). Facilitating the exchange of explicit knowledge through ontology mappings. In Proceedings of the 14th International Florida Artificial Intelligence Research Society Conference (FLAIRS'01) (pp. 305-309). AAAI Press.
23. Li, W., & Clifton, C. (2000). Semint: A tool for identifying attribute correspondences in heterogeneous databases using neural networks. Data Knowledge Engineering, 33(1), 49-84.
24. Madhavan, J., Bernstein, P. A., & Rahm, E. (2001). Generic schema matching with cupid. In Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Very Large Data Bases (VLDB'01) (pp. 49-58).
25. Melnik, S., Garcia-Molina, H., & Rahm, E. (2002). Similarity flooding: A versatile graph matching algorithm and its application to schema matching. In Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Data Engineering (ICDE'02) (pp. 117-128). IEEE Computer Society.
26. Nottelmann, H., & Straccia, U. (2005). A probabilistic, logic-based framework for automated Web directory alignment. In Z. Ma (Ed.), Soft computing in ontologies and the Semantic Web. Studies in fuzziness and soft computing (pp. 47-77). Springer Verlag.
27. Noy, N., & Musen, M. (2001). Anchor-prompt: Using non-local context for semantic matching. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Ontologies and Information Sharing at the 17th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI'01) (pp. 63-70).
28. Qu, Y., Hu, W., & Cheng, G. (2006). Constructing virtual documents for ontology matching. In Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on World Wide Web (WWW '06) (pp. 23-31). New York: ACM Press.
29. Rahm, E., & Bernstein, P. A. (2001). A survey of approaches to automatic schema matching. The VLDB Journal, 10(4), 334-350.
30. Shvaiko, P., & Euzenat, J. (2005). A survey of schema-based matching approaches. Journal on Data Semantics, 4,146-171.
31. Straccia, U., & Troncy, R. (2005). omap: Combining classifiers for aligning automatically owl ontologies. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Web Information Systems Engineering (WISE-05) (pp. 133-147). Springer Verlag.
32. Stumme, G., & Maedche, A. (2001). FCAMERGE: Bottom-up merging of ontologies. In Proceedings of the 17th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI'01) (pp. 225-234).
33. Winkler, W. E. (1999). The state of record linkage and current research problems (Tech. Rep. Statistical Research Division, U.S. Bureau of the Census)