Shape control of cellulose nanocrystals via compositional acid hydrolysis

Journal of Biomedical Nanotechnology

Volumn 9, Issue 7, 2013, Pages 1293-1298

  Baek, Changyoon ^a   Hanif, Zahid ^b   Cho, Seung Woo ^c   Kim, Dong Ik ^d   Um, Soong Ho ^a,e  

^a Sungkyunkwan University   (South Korea)

^b Gwangju Institute of Science and Technology (GIST)   (South Korea)

^c Yonsei University   (South Korea)

^d Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine   (South Korea)

^e Sungkyunkwan University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Acid hydrolysis; Cellulose nanocrystals (CNC); Drug carrier; Mesoporous structure; Microcrystalline cellulose (MCC); Spherical or rod type nanoparticulate

Indexed keywords

ACID HYDROLYSIS; CELLULOSE NANOCRYSTAL (CNC); DRUG CARRIER; MESOPOROUS STRUCTURES; MICROCRYSTALLINE CELLULOSE; NANO PARTICULATES;

BIOCOMPATIBILITY; BIOLOGICAL MATERIALS; BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING; CELLULOSE; CRYSTALLINE MATERIALS; HYDROLYSIS; MOLECULAR BIOLOGY; SPHERES;

CELLULOSE DERIVATIVES;

CELLULOSE; CELLULOSE NANOCRYSTAL; DRUG CARRIER; HYDROCHLORIC ACID; MICROCYSTALLINE CELLULOSE; NANOCRYSTAL; SULFURIC ACID; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ACIDIFICATION; ARTICLE; CRYSTAL STRUCTURE; HYDROLYSIS; MORPHOLOGY; POROSITY; SYNTHESIS;

CELLULOSE; CRYSTALLIZATION; HYDROCHLORIC ACID; HYDROLYSIS; MACROMOLECULAR SUBSTANCES; MATERIALS TESTING; MOLECULAR CONFORMATION; NANOCAPSULES; PARTICLE SIZE; SULFURIC ACIDS; SURFACE PROPERTIES;

CELLULOSE; CELLULOSE DERIVATIVES; HYDROLYSIS; SPHERES;

EID: 84880548518     PISSN: 15507033     EISSN: 15507041     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1166/jbn.2013.1535     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. G. Orive, R. M. Hernández, A. R. Gascón, R. Calafiore, T. M. S. Chang, P. D. Vos, G. Hortelano, D. Hunkeler, I. Lacík, A. M. J. Shapiro, and J. Luis Pedraz, Cell encapsulation: Promise and progress. Nature Medicine 9, 104 (2003).
2. V. P. Chauhan, Z. Popovic, O. Chen, J. Cui, D. Fukumura, M. G. Bawendi, and R. K. Jain, Fluorescent nanorods and nanospheres for real-time in vivo probing of nanoparticle shape-dependent tumor penetration. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 123, 1 (2011).
3. T. M. Allen and P. R. Cullis, Drug delivery systems: Entering the mainstream. Science 303, 1818 (2004).
4. A. El-Ansary and S. Al-Daihan, On the toxicity of therapeutically used nanoparticles: An overview. J. Toxicol. 2009, 1 (2009).
5. D. Peer, J. M. Karp, S. Hong, O. C. Farokhzad, R. Margalit, and R. Langer, Nanocarriers as an emerging platform for cancer therapy. Nature 2, 751 (2007).
6. B. Fadeel and A. E. Garcia-Bennett, Better safe than sorry: Understanding the toxicological properties of inorganic nanoparticles manufactured for biomedical applications. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 62, 362 (2010).
7. S. J. Eichhorn, Cellulose nanowhiskers: Promising materials for advanced applications. Soft Matter. 7, 303 (2011).
8. Y. Habibi, L. A. Lucia, and O. J. Rojas, Cellulose nanocrystals: Chemistry, self-assembly, and applications. Chem. Rev. 110, 3479 (2010).
9. M. A. S. A. Samir, F. Alloin, and A. Dufresne, Review of recent research into cellulosic whiskers, their properties and their application in nanocomposite field. Biomacromolecules 6, 612 (2005).
10. P. Lu and Y. Hsieh, Preparation and properties of cellulose nanocrystals: Rods, spheres, and network. Carbohydr. Polym. 82, 329 (2010).
11. F. Camacho, P. Gonzalez-Tello, E. Jurado, and A. Robles, Microcrystalline-cellulose hydrolysis with concentrated sulphuric acid. J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. 67, 350 (1996).
12. X. Dong, J. O. Revol, and D. G. Gray, Effect of microcrystallite preparation conditions on the formation of colloid crystals of cellulose. Cellulose 5, 19 (1998).
13. J. Zhang, T. J. Elder, Y. Pu, and A. J. Ragauskas, Facile synthesis of spherical cellulose nanoparticles. Carbohydr. Polym. 69, 607 (2007).
14. S. Elazzouzi-Hafraoui, Y. Nishiyama, J. Putaux, L. Heux, F. Dubreuil, and C. Rochas, The shape and size distribution of crystalline nanoparticles prepared by acid hydrolysis of native cellulose. Biomacromolecules 9, 57 (2008).
15. M. Hasani, E. D. Cranston, G. Westman, and D. G. Gray, Cationic surface functionalization of cellulose nanocrystals. Soft Matter. 4, 2238 (2008).
16. D. J. Gardner, G. S. Oporto, R. Mills, and M. A. S. A. Samir, Adhesion and surface issues in cellulose and nanocellulose. J. Adhes. Sci. Technol. 22, 545 (2008).
17. K. A. Mahmoud, J. A. Mena, K. B. Male, S. Hrapovic, A. Kamen, and J. H. T. Luong, Effect of surface charge on the cellular uptake and cytotoxicity of fluorescent labeled cellulose nanocrystals. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2, 2924 (2010).
18. S. D. and M. Roman, Fluorescently labeled cellulose nanocrystals for bioimaging applications. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 129, 13810 (2007).
19. M. Ka and M. B. H. S. L. Jh, Cellulose nanocrystal/gold nanoparticle composite as a matrix for enzyme immobilization. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 7, 1383 (2009).
20. L. Lacerda, M. A. Herrero, K. Venner, A. Bianco, M. Prato, and K. Kostarelos, Carbon-nanotube shape and individualization critical for renal excretion. Small 4, 1130 (2008).
21. J. A. Champion, Y. K. Katare, and S. Mitragotri, Particle shape: A new design parameter for micro- and nanoscale drug delivery carriers. J. Control. Release 121, 3 (2007).
22. Y. Geng, P. Lhaimer, S. Cai, R. Tsai, M. Tewari, T. Minko, and D. E. Discher, Shape effects of filaments versus spherical particles in flow and drug delivery. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2, 249 (2007).
23. N. Nishiyama, Nanomedicine: Nanocarriers shape up for long life. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2, 203 (2007).
24. S. M. Moghimi and J. Szebeni, Stealth liposomes and long circulating nanoparticles: Critical issues in pharmacokinetics, opsonization and protein-binding properties. Prog. Lipid Res. 42, 463 (2003).
25. J. Araki, M. Wada, S. Kuga, and T. Okano, Influence of surface charge on viscosity behavior of cellulose microcrystal suspension. J. Wood Sci. 45, 258 (1999).
26. M. F. Rosa, E. S. Medeiros, J. A. Malmonge, K. S. Gregorski, D. F. Wood, L. H. C. Mattoso, G. Glenn, W. J. Orts, and S. H. Imamb, Cellulose nanowhiskers from coconut husk fibers: Effect of preparation conditions on their thermal and morphological behavior. Carbohydr. Polym. 81, 83 (2010).