Structural validation of a feedback perceptions questionnaire

Learning in the Disciplines: ICLS 2010 Conference Proceedings - 9th International Conference of the Learning Sciences

Volumn 2, Issue , 2010, Pages 334-335

  Strijbos, Jan Willem ^a   Pat El, Ron J ^a   Narciss, Susanne ^b  

^a LEIDEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b DRESDEN UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

FEEDBACK RESEARCHES;

SURVEYS;

EID: 84880547465     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (7)

1. Byrne, B. M. (2006). Structural equation modelling with EQS. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
2. Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77, 81-112.
3. Kluger, A. N., & DeNisi, A. (1996). The effects of feedback interventions on performance: A historical review, a meta-analysis, and a preliminary feedback intervention theory. Psychological Bulletin, 119, 254-284.
4. Kwok, L. (2008). Students' perception of peer evaluation and teachers' role in seminar discussions. Electronic Journal of Foreign Language Teaching, 5, 89-97.
5. Narciss, S. (2008). Feedback strategies for interactive learning tasks. In J. M. Spector, M. D. Merrill, J. J. G. Van Merriënboer, & M. P. Driscoll (Eds.), Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (3rd ed., pp. 125-143). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
6. Shute, V. J. (2008). Focus on formative feedback. Review of Educational Research, 78, 153-189.
7. Strijbos, J. W., Narciss, S., & Dünnebier, K. (in press). Peer feedback content and sender's competence level in academic writing revision tasks: Are they critical for feedback perceptions and efficiency? Learning and Instruction.