Extending the self-explanation effect to second language Grammar learning

Learning in the Disciplines: ICLS 2010 Conference Proceedings - 9th International Conference of the Learning Sciences

Volumn 1, Issue , 2010, Pages 57-64

  Wylie, Ruth ^a   Koedinger, Kenneth ^a   Mitamura, Teruko ^a  

^a CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CLASSROOM STUDY; IN-VIVO; INSTRUCTIONAL STRATEGY; SCIENCE LEARNING; SECOND LANGUAGE; SELF EXPLANATIONS;

TEACHING;

STUDENTS;

EID: 84880543013     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (17)

1. Aleven, V. & Koedinger K. (2002). An effective metacognitive strategy: Learning by doing and explaining with a computer-based cognitive tutor. Cognitive Science, 26, 147-179.
2. Chi, M. T. H., Bassok, M., Lewis, M. W., Reimann, P., & Glaser, R. (1989). Self-explanations: How students study and use examples in learning to solve problems. Cognitive Science, 13, 145-182.
3. Chi, M.T.H., de Leeuw, N., Chiu, M.H., LaVancher, C. (1994). Eliciting self-explanations improves understanding. Cognitive Science, 18, 439-477.
4. Cole, T. (2000). The Article Book: Practice Towards Mastering a, an, and the. University of Michigan Press.
5. th International Conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems, 304-313.
6. Doughty, C. (2001). Cognitive underpinnings of focus on form. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and Second Language Instruction, 206-257.
7. Dryer, M. (2008) Definite Articles. In: In: Haspelmath, Martin & Dryer, Matthew S. & Gil, David & Comrie, Bernard (eds.) The World Atlas of Language Structures Online. Munich: Max Planck Digital Library, chapter 37. Available online at http://wals.info/feature/37. Accessed on October 28, 2009.
8. Ellis, R. (1994). The Study of Second Language Acquisition. Oxford University Press.
9. Hake, R. (1998). Interactive-engagement versus traditional methods: a six-thousand-student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses. American Journal of Physics, 66, 64 - 74.
10. Koedinger, K., Aleven, V., Heffernan. T., McLaren, B. & Hockenberry, M. (2004). Opening the Door to Non-Programmers: Authoring Intelligent Tutor Behavior by Demonstration. Proceedings of 7th Annual Intelligent Tutoring Systems Conference. Maceio, Brazil.
11. Master, P. (1997) The English Article System: Acquisition, Function, and Pedagogy. System, 25(2), 215-232.
12. McNamara, D.S. (2004). SERT: Self-explanation reading training. Discourse Processes, 38, 1-30.
13. Norris, J. M., & Ortega, L. (2000). Effectiveness of L2 instruction: A research synthesis and quantitative meta-analysis. Language Learning, 50, 417-528.
14. Renkl, A. (1999) Learning mathematics from worked-out examples: Analyzing and fostering self-explanations. European Journal of Psychology in Education, 16, 477-488.
15. Rosenbaum, P. & Rubin, D. (1984) Reducing the bias in observational studies using subclassification on the propensity score. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 79, 516-524.
16. Roy, M. & Chi, M.T.H. (2005). Self-explanation in a multi-media context. In R. Mayer (Ed.), Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning, 271-286.
17. Williams, J. & Evans, J. (1998). What kind of foucs and on which forms? In C. Doughty & J. Williams (Eds.), Focus on Form in Classroom Second Language Acquisition, 139-155.