Caesarean section surgical techniques (CORONIS): A fractional, factorial, unmasked, randomised controlled trial

The Lancet

Volumn 382, Issue 9888, 2013, Pages 234-248

  Brocklehurst, Peter ^a,b   Abalos, E ^b   Addo, V ^b   El Sheikh, M ^b   Mathews, J E ^b   Naz Masood, S ^b   Oyarzun, E ^b   Oyieke, J ^b   Sharma, J B ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ABDOMINAL WALL CLOSURE; ARGENTINA; ARTICLE; CESAREAN SECTION; CHILE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; GENERAL ANESTHESIA; GHANA; HEMOSTASIS; HUMAN; INDIA; KENYA; NEWBORN; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PAKISTAN; PERITONEUM; PREGNANCY OUTCOME; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; REGIONAL ANESTHESIA; SUDAN; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE;

EID: 84880507165     PISSN: 01406736     EISSN: 1474547X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)60441-9     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. L Gibbons, J Belizán, J Lauer, A Betrán, M Merialdi, F Althabe World Health Report 2010. The global numbers and costs of additionally needed and unnecessary caesarean sections performed per year: overuse as a barrier to universal coverage 2010 World Health Organization Geneva
2. JM Belizan, F Althabe, FC Barros, S Alexander Rates and implications of caesarean sections in Latin America: ecological study BMJ 319 1999 1397 1402
3. J Villar, E Valladares, D Wojdyla for the WHO 2005 global survey on maternal and perinatal health research group Caesarean delivery rates and pregnancy outcomes: the 2005 WHO global survey on maternal and perinatal health in Latin America Lancet 367 2006 1819 1829
4. BT Bateman, MF Berman, LE Riley, LR Lefferet The epidemiology of postpartum hemorrhage in a large, nationwide sample of deliveries Anesth Analg 110 2010 1368 1373
5. V Briand, A Dumont, M Abrahamowicz et al. Maternal and perinatal outcome by mode of delivery in Senegal and Mali: a cross-sectional epidemiological survey PLoS One 7 2012 e47352
6. GJ Hofmeyr, M Mathai, AN Shah, N Novikova Techniques for caesarean section Cochrane Database Syst Rev 1 2008 CD004662
7. V Berghella, JK Baxter, SP Chauhan Evidence-based surgery for cesarean delivery Am J Obstet Gynecol 193 2005 1607 1617
8. L Tully, S Gates, P Brocklehurst, K McKenzie-McHarg, S Ayers Surgical techniques used during caesarean section operations: results of a national survey of practice in the UK Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 102 2002 120 126
9. CAESAR Study Collaborative Group Caesarean section surgical techniques: a randomised factorial trial (CAESAR) BJOG 117 2010 1366 1376
10. CORONIS Trial Collaborative Group The CORONIS Trial. International study of caesarean section surgical techniques: a randomised fractional, factorial trial BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 7 2007 24
11. JL Haybittle Repeated assessments of results in clinical trials of cancer treatment Br J Radiol 44 1971 793 797
12. R Peto, MC Pike, P Armitage et al. Design and analysis of randomized clinical trials requiring prolonged observation of each patient. I. Introduction and design Br J Cancer 34 1976 585 612
13. RW Mee A comprehensive guide to factorial two-level experimentation 2009 Springer New York
14. S Gates, P Brocklehurst How should randomised trials including multiple pregnancies be analysed? BJOG 111 2004 213 219
15. S Joel-Cohen Abdominal and vaginal hysterectomy: new techniques based on time and motion studies 1977 William Heinemann Medical Books London
16. CA Walsh, SR Walsh Extraabdominal vs intraabdominal uterine repair at cesarean delivery: a metaanalysis Am J Obstet Gynecol 200 2009 625.e1 625.e8
17. M Doganay, EA Tongue, T Var Effects of method of uterine repair on surgical outcome of caesarean delivery Int J Gynecol Obstet 111 2010 175 178
18. AA Bamigboye, GJ Hofmeyr Closure versus non-closure of the peritoneum at caesarean section Cochrane Database Syst Rev 4 2003 CD000163
19. C Huchon, C Raiffort, C Chis, MC Jacquemot, P Panel Caesarean section: closure or non-closure of peritoneum? A randomized trial of postoperative morbidity Gyneol Obstet Fertil 33 2005 745 749 (in French).
20. N Khadem, N Ghomian The effect of the peritoneal non closure at cesarean section on short term post-operative complications BJOG 115 suppl 1 2008 99
21. C Mocanasu, E Anton, R Chirila Peritoneal suture vs non-suture at caesarean section Rev Med Chir Soc Med Nat Iasi 109 2005 810 812 (in Romanian).
22. AY Shahin, AM Osman Parietal peritoneal closure and persistent postcesarean pain Int J Gynecol Obstet 104 2009 135 139
23. JM Dodd, ER Anderson, S Gates Surgical techniques for uterine incision and uterine closure at the time of caesarean section Cochrane Database Syst Rev 3 2008 CD004732
24. AK Sood Single versus double layer closure of low transverse uterine incision and caesarean section J Obstet Gynaecol India 55 2005 231 236
25. W Weerawetwat, S Buranawanich, M Kanawong Closure vs non-closure of the visceral and parietal peritoneum at cesarean delivery: 16 year study J Med Assoc Thai 87 2004 1007 1011
26. SJ Chapman, J Owen, JC Hauth One- versus two-layer closure of a low transverse cesarean: the next pregnancy Obstet Gynecol 89 1997 16 18
27. E Roset, M Boulvain, O Irion Nonclosure of the peritoneum during caesarean section: long-term follow-up of a randomised controlled trial Eur J Obst Gynecol Reprod Biol 108 2003 40 44
28. EL Mozurkewich, EK Hutton Elective repeat cesarean delivery versus trial of labor: a meta-analysis of the literature from 1989 to 1999 Am J Obstet Gynecol 183 2000 1187 1197
29. SP Chauhan, JN Martin Jr, CE Henrichs, JC Morrison, EF Magann Maternal and perinatal complications with uterine rupture in 142â€̂075 patients who attempted vaginal birth after cesarean delivery: a review of the literature Am J Obstet Gynecol 189 2003 408 417
30. M Lydon-Rochelle, VL Holt, TR Easterling, DP Martin Risk of uterine rupture during labor among women with a prior cesarean delivery N Engl J Med 345 2001 3 8