Caesarean section: Closure or non-closure of peritoneum? A randomized trial of postoperative morbidity;La césarienne: Avec ou sans péritonisation? Étude randomisée de la morbidité postopératoire

Gynecologie Obstetrique et Fertilite

Volumn 33, Issue 10, 2005, Pages 745-749

  Huchon, C ^a   Raiffort, C ^a   Chis, C ^a   Messaoudi, F ^a   Jacquemot, M C ^a   Panel, P ^a  

^a CENTRE HOSPITALIER DE VERSAILLES   (France)

Author keywords

Caesarean section; Pain; Peritoneum; Peritoneum closure; Postoperative morbidity

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CESAREAN SECTION; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISEASE ASSOCIATION; EVALUATION; FEMALE; HEMATOMA; HOSPITALIZATION; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MATERNAL MORBIDITY; PERITONEUM; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; WOUND INFECTION;

EID: 25144518161     PISSN: 12979589     EISSN: 17696682     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.gyobfe.2005.08.001     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. P. Gaucherand, K. Bessai, P. Sergeant, and R.-C. Rudigoz Vers une simplification de l'oṕration ćsarienne:? J. Gynecol. Obstet. Biol. Reprod. (Paris) 30 2001 348 352
2. G. Holmgren, L. Sjoholm, and M. Stark The Misgav Ladach method for cesarean section: method description Acta Obstet. Gynecol. Scand. 78 7 1999 615 621
3. M. Stark, Y. Chavkin, C. Kupfersztain, P. Guedj, and A.R. Finkel Evaluation of combinations of procedures in caesarean section Int. J. Gynaecol. Obstet. 48 3 1995 273 276
4. G. Holtz Adhesion induction by suture of varying tissue reactivity and caliber Int. J. Fertil. 27 1982 134 135
5. T.E. Elkins, T.G. Stovall, J. Warren, F.W. Ling, and N.L. Meyer A histologic evaluation of peritoneal injury and repair: implications for adherence formation Obstet. Gynecol. 70 1987 225 228
6. H. Ellis The aetiology of postoperative abdominal adhesions, an experimental study Br. J. Surg. 50 1962 10 16
7. K.A. Galaal, and A. Krolikowski A randomized controlled study of peritoneal closure at caesarean section Saudi Med. J. 21 8 2000 759 761
8. K.E. Hojberg, J. Aagaard, H. Laursen, L. Diab, and N.J. Secher Closure vs non-closure of peritoneum at caesarean section evaluation of pain A Randomized Study. 77 7 1998 741 745
9. D.B. Hull, and M.W. Varner A randomized study of closure of the peritoneum at caesarean delivery Obstet. Gynecol. 77 6 1991 818 821
10. O. Irion, F. Luzuy, and F. B́guin Non-closure of the visceral and parietal peritoneum at caesarean section: a randomised controlled trial Br. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 103 1996 690 694
11. O. Irion, and N. Fournet Will you leave the peritoneum open when performing your next caesarean section? Contemp. Rev. Obstet. Gynaecol. 8 1996 209 212
12. M. Pietrantoni, M.T. Parsons, W.F. O'Brien, E. Collins, R.A. Knuppel, and W.N. Spellacy Peritoneal closure or non-closure at caesarean Obstet. Gynecol. 77 2 1991 293 296
13. H.S. Grundsell, D.E. Rizk, and R.M. Kumar Randomized study of non-closure of peritoneum in lower segment cesarean section Acta Obstet. Gynecol. Scand. 77 1998 110 115
14. F. Nagele, H. Karas, D. Spitzer, A. Staudach, S. Karasegh, and A. Beck Closure or nonclosure of the visceral peritoneum at caesarean delivery Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 174 4 1996 1366 1370
15. Z. Rafique, K.U. Shibli, I.F. Russel, and S.W. Lindow A randomised controlled trial of the closure or non-closure of peritoneum at caesarean section: effect on post-operative pain Brit J. Obstet. Gynecol. 109 2002 694 698
16. C.S. Wilkinson, and M.W. Enkin Peritoneal non-closure at caesarean section Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2 2000 (CD000163)
17. A.A. Bamigboye, and G.J. Hofmeyr Non-closure of peritoneal surfaces at caesarean section. A systematic review S. Afr. Med. J. 95 2 2005 123 126
18. E. Roset, M. Boulvain, and O. Irion Non-closure of the peritoneum during caesarean section: long-term follow-up of a randomised controlled trial Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 108 2003 40 44
19. T. Tulanli, H.S. Hum, and M.M. Gelfand Closure of laparotomy incisions with or without peritoneal suturing and second-look laparoscopy Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 158 1988 536 537