Enhancing and scaling-up design-based research: The potential of e-research

Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning Conference, CSCL

Volumn , Issue PART 2, 2008, Pages 27-34

  Markauskaite, Lina ^a   Reimann, Peter ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CRITICAL ELEMENTS; DESIGN-BASED RESEARCH; LEARNING SCIENCE; RESEARCH DOMAINS; RESEARCH PROCESS; RESEARCH QUESTIONS; TECHNICAL DEVELOPMENT; TECHNOLOGICAL FEATURE;

COMPUTER SCIENCE;

RESEARCH;

EID: 84880444810     PISSN: 15734552     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (44)

1. Abbott, A. (1990). Conceptions of time and events in social science methods: Causal and narrative approaches. Historical Methods, 23(140-150).
2. Anderson, T., & Kamuka, H. (2003). E-research: Methods, strategies and issues. Boston: Pearson Education.
3. Barab, S. A., & Squire, K. (2004). Design-based research: Putting a stake in the ground. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(1), 1-14.
4. Berman, F., Fox, G., & Hey, A. (2003). The Grid: Past, present, future. In F. Berman, G. Fox & A. Hey (Eds.), Grid computing: Making the global infrastructure a reality (pp. 9-50). West Sussex: Wiley.
5. Brown, A. L. (1992). Design experiments: Theoretical and methodological challenges in creating complex interventions. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2, 141-178.
6. Chorley, A., Edwards, P., Preece, A., & Farrington, J. (2007, October). Tools for tracing evidence in social science. Paper presented at the Third international conference on e-social science, Ann Arbor, MI, US.
7. Collins, A. (1992). Toward a design science of education. In E. Scanlon & T. O'Shea (Eds.), New directions in educational technology. Berlin: Springer.
8. Collins, A., Joseph, D., & Bielaczyc, K. (2004). Design research: theoretical and methodological issues. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(1), 15-42.
9. De Roure, D., & Frey, J. (2007). Three perspectives on collaborative knowledge acquisition in e-science. Paper presented at the Workshop on semantic web for collaborative knowledge acquisition, Hyderabad, India.
10. De Roure, D., Jennings, N. R., & Shadbolt, N. R. (2005). The semantic grid: Past, present, and future. Proceedings of the IEEE, 93(3), 669-681.
11. Dede, C. (2004). If design-based research is the answer, what is the question? The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(1), 105-114.
12. DEST. (2006). An Australian e-research strategy and implementation framework: Final report of the e-research coordinating committee. Commonwealth of Australia: Australian Government, DEST.
13. Dutton, W. H. (2007, October). Reconfiguring access to information and expertise in the social sciences: The social shaping and implications of cyberinfrastructure. Paper presented at the Third international conference on e-social science, Ann Arbor, MI.
14. Fishman, B., Marx, R. W., Blumenfeld, P., Krajcik, J., & Soloway, E. (2004). Creating a framework for research on systemic technology innovations. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(1), 43-76.
15. Foster, I., Kesselman, C., & Tuecke, S. (2001). The anatomy of the grid. Enabling scalable virtual organizations. International Journal of Supercomputer Applications, 15(3), 200-222.
16. Goldman, R., Pea, R., Barron, B., & Sharon, S. D. (2007). Video research in the learning sciences. Mahwah, NJ.: Erlbaum.
17. Goodyear, P. (2005). Environments for life-long learning: Ergonomics, architecture and the practice of educational technology. In J. M. Spector & T. M. Anderson (Eds.), Integrated and holistic perspectives on learning, instruction, and technology: Understanding complexity (pp. 1-18). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
18. Groth, P., et al. (2006). An architecture for provenance systems. Retrieved 28-Oct-2007, from http://eprints.ecs.soton.ac.uk/12023/.
19. Harrer, A., Hever, R., & Ziebarth, S. (2007). Empowering researchers to detect interaction patterns in e-collaboration. In R. Luckin, K. R. Koedinger & J. Greer (Eds.), Artificial intelligence in education - Building technology rich learning contexts that work (pp. 503-510). Amsterdam: IOS Press.
20. Holland, J. H., Holyoak, K. J., Nisbett, R. E., & Thagard, P. R. (1986). Induction: Processes of inference, learning, and discovery. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
21. Jacobson, M. J., & Wilensky, U. (2006). Complex systems in education: Scientific and educational importance and implications for the learning sciences. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 15(1), 11-34.
22. Kelly, A. E. (2003). Theme issue: The role of design in educational research. Educational Researcher, 32(1).
23. Kelly, A. E. (2004). Design research in education: Yes, but is it methodological? The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(1), 115-128.
24. Koedinger, K. R., & Corbett, A. (2006). Cognitive tutors. In R. K. Sawyer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 61-77). New York: Cambridge University Press.
25. Koper, R. (2005). An introduction to learning design. In R. Koper & C. Tattersall (Eds.), Learning design. A handbook on modelling and delivering networked education and training (pp. 3-20). Berlin: Springer.
26. Law, N., Yuen, J., Huan, R., Li, Y., & Pan, N. (2007). A learnable content and participation analysis toolkit for assessing CSCL learning outcomes and processes. In C. Chinn, G. Erkens & S. Puntambekar (Eds.), Mice, minds, and society. Proceedings of the CSCL 2007 conference (Vol. 8, pp. 408-417). New Brunswick, NJ: ISLS.
27. Newell. (1990). Unified theories of cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
28. O'Brien, L. (2005). E-research: An imperative for strengthening institutional partnerships. Educause Review, 40(6), 64-77.
29. Oinn, T., et al. (2006). Taverna: Lessons in creating a workflow environment for the life sciences. Concurrency and Computation: Practice and Experience, 18(10), 1067-1100.
30. Paterson, M., Lindsay, D., Monotti, A., & Chin, A. (2007). DART: A new missile in Australia's e-research strategy. Online Information Review, 31(2), 116-134.
31. Pea, R. (2005). Video-as-data and digital video manipulation techniques for transforming learning science research, education, and other cultural practices. In J. Weiss, J. Nolan & P. Trifonas (Eds.), International handbook of virtual learning environments. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
32. Philip, L., Chorley, A., Farrington, J., & Edwards, P. (2007, October). Data provenance, evidence-based policy assessment, and e-social science. Paper presented at the Third international conference on e-social science, Ann Arbor, MI.
33. Pignotti, E., Edwards, P., Preece, A., Polhill, G., & Gotts, N. (2005). Semantic support for computational land-use modelling. In Fifth IEEE international symposium on cluster computing and grid (Vol. 2, pp. 840-847): IEEE Press.
34. Poschl, U. (2004). Interactive journal concept for improved scientific publishing and quality assurance. Learned Publishing, 17, 105-113.
35. Reimann, P. (2007). Time is precious: Why process analysis is essential for CSCL. In C. Chinn, G. Erkens & S. Puntambekar (Eds.), Minds, minds, and society. Mice, minds, and society. Proceedings of the CSCL 2007 conference (Vol. 8, pp. 598-607). New Brunswick, NJ: ISLS.
36. Reimann, P., & Spada, H. (Eds.). (1995). Learning in humans and machines: towards an interdisciplinary learning science. Oxford: Pergamon.
37. Sandoval, W. A., & Bell, P. (2004). Design-based research methods for studying learning in context: introduction. Educational Psychologist, 39(4), 199-201.
38. Schooneboom, J., Levene, M., Heller, J., Keenoy, K., & Turcsanyi-Szabo, M. (Eds.). (2007). Trails in education: Technologies that support navigational learning. Rotterdam, Taipei: Sense Publishers.
39. Seringhaus, M., & Gerstein, M. (2007). Publishing perishing? Towards tomorrow's information architecture. BMC Bioinformatics, 8(17), 1-5.
40. Stevens, R., Robinson, A., & Goble, C. (2003). MyGrid: Personalised bioinformatics on the information grid. Bioinformatics, 19(1), 302-304.
41. Sun, R. (Ed.). (2006). Cognition and multi-agent interaction. From cognitive modelling to social simulation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
42. Taylor, K., et al. (2006). The Semantic Grid and chemistry: Experiences with CombeChem. Journal of Web Semantics, 4(2), 84-101.
43. Wang, F., & Hannafin, M. (2005). Design-based research and technology-enhanced learning environments. Educational Technology, Research and Development, 53(4), 5-23.
44. Wouters, P. (2005, June). The Virtual knowledge studio for the humanities and social sciences. Paper presented at the First international conference on e-social science, Manchester.