CellProfiler and KNIME: Open source tools for high content screening

Methods in Molecular Biology

Volumn 986, Issue , 2013, Pages 105-122

  Stöter, Martin ^a   Niederlein, Antje ^a   Barsacchi, Rico ^a   Meyenhofer, Felix ^a   Brandl, Holger ^a   Bickle, Marc ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

CellProfiler; Distributed computing; High content screening; Image processing; KNIME; Open Source; Statistics

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COMPUTER PROGRAM; DATA ANALYSIS; DATA MINING; DRUG DEVELOPMENT; DRUG INDUSTRY; DRUG SCREENING; HIGH CONTENT SCREENING; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGING; MICROSCOPY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; ECONOMICS; EQUIPMENT; HIGH THROUGHPUT SCREENING; IMAGE PROCESSING; METHODOLOGY;

DRUG DISCOVERY; HIGH-THROUGHPUT SCREENING ASSAYS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; SOFTWARE;

MLCS; MLOWN;

EID: 84880440699     PISSN: 10643745     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-62703-311-4_8     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Johnston AR, Powell RV (1970) Optics at the Jet Propulsion Laboratory. Appl Opt 9:271-275
2. Harmon LD, Knowlton KC (1969) Picture processing by computer. Science 164:19-29
3. Lipkin LE, Lipkin BS (1975) Computers in the clinical pathologic laboratory: chemistry and image processing. Annu Rev Biophys Bioeng 4:529-577
4. Blackwell RJ, Crisci WA (1975) Digital image processing technology and its application in forensic sciences. J Forensic Sci 20:17
5. Archer JR (2004) History evolution, and trends in compound management for high throughput screening. ASSAY Drug Dev Technol 2: 675-681
6. Newman DJ, Cragg GM, Snader KM (2003) Natural products as sources of new drugs over the period 1981-2002. J Nat Prod 66:1022-1037
7. Ortholand J-Y, Ganesan A (2004) Natural products and combinatorial chemistry: back to the future. Curr Opin Chem Biol 8:271-280
8. Giuliano KA, DeBiasio RL, Dunlay RT et al (1997) High-content screening: a new approach to easing key bottlenecks in the drug discovery process. J Biomol Screen 2:249
9. Verkman AS (2004) Drug discovery in academia. Am J Physiol: Cell Physiol 286: C465-C474
10. Cressey D (2011) Drug-maker plans to cut jobs and spending as industry shies away from drug discovery. Nature 470:154
11. Holt R (2011) Dueling visions for science. Science 333:1549
12. Gulledge J (2011) Debt crisis: crunch time for US science. Nature 477:155-156
13. Hunter P (2010) Facing the credit crunch. EMBO Rep 11:924-926
14. Roy A, McDonald PR, Sittampalam S, Chaguturu R (2010) Open access high throughput drug discovery in the public domain: a mount everest in the making. Curr Pharmaceut Biotechnol 11:764-778
15. D'Ausilio A (2012) Arduino: a low-cost multi purpose lab equipment. Behav Res Meth. 44(2):305-313
16. Santos AF, Zaltsman AB, Martin RC et al (2008) Angiogenesis: an improved in vitro biological system and automated image-based work flow to aid identification and characterization of angiogenesis and angiogenic modulators. ASSAY Drug Devel Technol 6: 693-710
17. Carpenter A, Jones T, Lamprecht M et al (2006) Cell Profiler: image analysis software for identifying and quantifying cell phenotypes. Genome Biol 7:R100
18. Kamentsky L, Jones TR, Fraser A et al (2011) Improved structure, function and compatibility for CellProfiler: modular high-throughput image analysis software. Bioinformatics 27: 1179-1180
19. Bray M-A, Fraser AN, Hasaka TP et al (2011) Work flow and metrics for image quality control in large-scale high-content screens. J Biomol Screen 17:135-143
20. Jones R, Carpenter E, Lamprecht R et al (2009) Scoring diverse cellular morphologies in imagebased screens with iterative feedback and machine learning. PNAS 106:1826-1831
21. Jones T, Kang I, Wheeler D et al (2008) CellProfiler analyst: data exploration and analysis software for complex image-based screens. BMC Bioinformatics 9:482
22. Zhang J-H, Chung TDY, Oldenburg KR (1999) A simple statistical parameter for use in evaluation and validation of high throughput screening assays. J Biomol Screen 4:67-73
23. Zhang X. D, (2007) A pair of new statistical parameters for quality control in RNA interference high-throughput screening assays, Genomics 89:552-561
24. Moddemeijer R (1999) A statistic to estimate the variance of the histogram based mutual information estimator based on dependent pairs of observations. Signal Process 75:51-63
25. Pearson K (1896) Mathematical contributions to the theory of evolution. III. Regression, heredity and panmixia. Phil Trans Roy Soc London Ser A 187:253-318
26. Brideau C, Gunter B, Pikounis B et al (2003) Improved statistical methods for hit selection in high-throughput screening. J Biomol Screen 8:634-647
27. Birmingham A, Selfors LM, Forster T et al (2009) Statistical methods for analysis of highthroughput RNA interference screens. Nat Meth 6:569-575
28. Shun TY, Lazo JS, Sharlow ER et al (2011) Identifying actives from HTS data sets. J Biomol Screen 16:1-14
29. Mahalanobis PC (1936) On the generalised distance in statistics. Proc Natl Inst Sci India 2:49-55
30. Conrad C, Gerlich DW (2010) Automated microscopy for high-content RNAi screening. JCB 188:453-461