Institutional work and complicit decoupling across the U.S. capital markets: The work of rating agencies

Business Ethics Quarterly

Volumn 23, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 1-30

  Clark, Cynthia E ^a   Newell, Sue ^a  

^a BENTLEY UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Capital markets (U.S.); Complicit decoupling; Institutional maintenance and policing work

Indexed keywords

EID: 84880425043     PISSN: 1052150X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5840/beq20132311     Document Type: Article

References (111)

1. Abdelal, R., DiTella, R., & Schlefer, J. 2009. Eliot Spitzer: Pushing Wall Street to reform. Case No. 9-708-019. Boston: Harvard Business School Publishing.
2. Aguilera, R. V., & Cuervo-Cazurra, A. 2004. The spread of codes of good governance worldwide: What's the trigger? Organization Studies, 25(3): 415-43. http://dx.doi. org/10.1177/0170840604040669.
3. Baron, D. P. 2006. Corporate social responsibility and social entrepreneurship. Journal of Economics and Management Strategy, 16(3): 683-717. http://dx.doi. org/10.1111/j.1530-9134.2007.00154.x.
4. Behnam, M., & MacLean, T. L. 2011. Where is the accountability in international accountability standards?: A Decoupling Perspective. Business Ethics Quarterly, 21(1): 45-72. http://dx.doi.org/10.5840/beq20112113.
5. Berger, P. L., & Luckmann, T. 1967. The social construction of reality. New York: Anchor Books.
6. Bethel, J. E., & Gillan, S. L. 2002. The impact of the institutional and regulatory environment on shareholder voting. Financial Management, 31(4): 29-54. http://dx.doi. org/10.2307/3666173.
7. Bhagat, S., Bolton, B. J., & Romano, R. 2007. The promise and peril of corporate governance indices. ECGI-Law Working Paper, No. 89/2007.
8. Bikhchandani, S., Hirschleifer, D., & Welch, I. 1998. Learning from the behavior of others: Conformity, fads, and informational cascades. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 12(3): 151-70. http://dx.doi.org/10.1257/jep.12.3.151.
9. Boatright, J. R. 2009. Conflicts of interest in financial services. Business and Society Review, 105: 201-19. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/0045-3609. 00078.
10. Brandon, K. L. 2005. SIA research management conference: Reflections on two years after the global settlement. SIA Research Reports, 6, 10.
11. -. 2006. Research management issues: How are the rules working? SIA Research Reports, 7, 3.
12. Business Week. 2003. Will it matter on Wall Street? The global settlement will help, but there's still room for abuse. May 12.
13. Carson, T. L. 2004. Conflicts of interest and self-dealing in the professions: A review. Business Ethics Quarterly, 14(1): 161-82. http://dx.doi.org/10.5840/beq20041413.
14. Chatterji, A. K., & Toffel, M. W. 2010. How firms respond to being rated. Strategic Management Journal, 31(9): 917-45.
15. Choi, S., Fisch, J., & Kahan, M. 2010. The power of proxy advisors: Myth or reality? Emory Law Journal, 59: 870-918.
16. Clark, C. E., & Van Buren, H. 2012. Compound conflicts of interest in the U.S. proxy system, Journal of Business Ethics. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/ s10551-012-1460-x.
17. Cottle, S., Murray, R. F., & Block, F. E. 1988. Graham and Dodd's security analysis, 5th edition. New York: McGraw-Hill.
18. Craig, S. 2002. Securities firms do the soft sell on their ratings. Wall Street Journal, September 13: Cl.
19. -. 2009. Goldman's trading tips reward its biggest clients. Wall Street Journal. August 24: A1.
20. Daines, R. M., Gow, I. D., & Larcker, D. F. 2010. Rating the ratings: How good are commercial governance ratings? Journal of Financial Economics, 98: 439-61.
21. Davis, G. F., & Kim, E. H. 2007. Business ties and proxy voting by mutual funds. Journal of Financial Economics, 85: 552-70. http://dx.doi.org/10. 1016/j.jfineco.2005.04.003.
22. Deegan, C., & Rankin, M. 1996. Do Australian companies objectively report environmental news? An analysis of environmental disclosures by firms successfully prosecuted by the Environmental Protection Authority. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 9(2): 50-67. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/ 09513579610116358.
23. DiMaggio, P. J. 1988. Interest and agency in institutional theory. In Zucker, L. G. (Ed.), Institutional patterns and organizations: Culture and environment: 3-21. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.
24. DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. 1983. The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective nationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48: 147-60. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2095101.
25. Eaglesham, J., & Newmann, J. 2011. Raters draw SEC scrutiny. Wall Street Journal, June 17: C1.
26. Edelman, L. B. 1992. Legal ambiguity and symbolic structures: Organizational mediation of civil rights law. American Journal of Sociology, 97: 1531-76. http://dx.doi. org/10.1086/229939.
27. Eisenhardt, K. M. 1989. Building theory from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14: 532-50.
28. Fama, E. F. 1970. Efficient capital markets: A review of theory and empirical work. Journal of Finance, 25(2): 383-417. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/ 2325486.
29. Fang, L., & Yasuda, A. 2009. The Effectiveness of reputation as a disciplinary mechanism in sell-side research. Review of Financial Studies, 22: 3735-78. http://dx.doi. org/10.1093/rfs/hhn116.
30. Friedland, R., & Alford, R. R. 1991. Bringing society back in: Symbols, practices, and institutional contradictions. In W. W. Powell & P. J. DiMaggio (Eds.), The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis: 232-63. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
31. Glaser, B. G. 1992. Basics of grounded theory analysis: Emerging versus forcing. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.
32. Goldberg, L. G., & Obenchain, T. 2010. Goldman Sachs: A bank for all seasons. Case No. 9-310-055. Boston: Harvard Business School Publishing, 1-16.
33. Greenwald, B., & Stiglitz, J. 1990. Asymmetric information and the new theory of the firms: Financial constraints and risk behavior. American Economic Review, 80: 160-65.
34. Greenwood, R., & Hinings, C. R. 1996. Understanding radical organizational change: Bringing together the old and the new institutionalism. Academy of Management Review, 21: 1022-54.
35. Groysberg, B., Healy, P., & Chapman, C. 2008. Buy-side vs. sell-side analysts' earnings forecasts. Financial Analysts Journal, 64(4): 25-39. http://dx.doi.org/10.2469/faj. v64.n4.3.
36. Hambrick, D. C., Werder, A., & Zajac, E. J. 2008. New directions in corporate governance research. Organization Science, 19(3): 381-85. http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/ orsc.1080.0361.
37. Harold, G., 1938. Bond ratings as an investment guide. New York: Ronald Press Company.
38. Harvard Law Review. 2002. Should the SEC expand nonfinancial disclosure requirements? 115: 1433-55.
39. Hayward, M. L. A., & Boeker, W. 1998. Power and conflicts of interest in professional firms: Evidence from investment banking. Administrative Science Quarterly, 43: 1-22. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2393589.
40. Hirsch, P., & Pozner, J. E. 2005. To avoid surprises, acknowledge the dark side: Illustrations from securities analysts. Strategic Organization, 3(2): 229-38. http://dx.doi. org/10.1177/1476127005052881.
41. Hirsch, P. M., & Bermiss, Y. S. 2009. Institutional 'dirty' work: preserving institutions through strategic decoupling. In T. B. Lawrence, R. Suddaby & B. Leca (Eds.), Institutional work: Actors and agency in institutional studies of organizations: 262-83. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
42. Holowecky, E., Murry, A., Staneva, V., & Fuglister, J. 2010. Bank regulatory reform in the United States: The case of Goldman and the Volcker rule. Journal of Business Case Studies, 6: 59-68.
43. Hymowitz, C., & Lublin, J. S. 2003. Corporate reform: The first year: Boardrooms under renovation; scandals prompted changes, but critics say more are needed to prevent another Enron. Wall Street Journal, July 22: B1.
44. Irvine, P. J. 2003. The incremental impact of analyst initiation of coverage. Journal of Corporate Finance, 9: 431-51. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/ S0929-1199(02)00053-6.
45. Jennings, M. M. 2010. The Goldman standard and shades of gray. Corporate Finance Review, 15(1): 35-41.
46. Jepperson, R. L. 1991. Institutions, institutional effects and institutionalism. In W. W. Powell & P. J. DiMaggio (Eds.), The new intuitionalism analysis: 143-63. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
47. Koehn, D. 2010. Living with the dragon: Thinking and acting ethically in a world of unintended consequences. New York: Routledge.
48. Lamin, A., & Zaheer, S. 2012. Wall Street vs. Main Street: Firm strategies for defending legitimacy and their impact on different stakeholders. Organization Science, 23(1): 47-66. http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1100.0631.
49. Langley, M. 2003. Making the grade: Want to lift your firm's rating on governance? Buy the test. Wall Street Journal, June 6: A1.
50. Lawrence, A., & Weber, J. 2011. Business and society: Stakeholders, ethics and public policy. New York: McGraw-Hill.
51. Lawrence, T. B., & Suddaby, R. 2006. Institutions and institutional work. In S. Clegg, C. Hardy, T. Lawrence, & W. Nord (Eds.), The Sage handbook of organizational studies: 215-54. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
52. Levitt, A., and Dwyer, P. 2002. Take on the street: What Wall Street and corporate America don't want you to know. New York: Pantheon.
53. Lewis, M. 2011. The big short. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.
54. Lindblad. C. 2011. Over rated. Bloomberg Business Week, November 28-December 4: 51-52.
55. Lowenstein, R. 2008. Triple-A failure. New York Times Magazine, April 27: 36-41.
56. MacLean, T. L., & Behnam, M. 2010. The dangers of decoupling: The relationship between compliance programs, legitimacy perceptions and institutional misconduct. Academy of Management Journal, 53: 1499-1520. http://dx.doi.org/10.5465/ AMJ.2010.57319198.
57. Mahoney, W. 1991. Investor relations: The professional's guide to financial marketing and communication. New York: Simon & Schuster.
58. Malkiel, B. 2002. Remaking the market: The Great Wall Street. Wall Street Journal, October 14: A16.
59. Marcoux, A. M. 2003. A fiduciary argument against stakeholder theory. Business Ethics Quarterly, 13(1): 1-24. http://dx.doi.org/10.5840/beq20031313.
60. Marquis, C., Zhang, J., & Zhou, Y. 2011. Regulatory uncertainty and corporate responses to environmental protection in China. California Management Review, 54(1): 39-63. http://dx.doi.org/10.1525/cmr.2011.54.1.39.
61. McDaniel, R. 2008. Testimony before the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, October 22. http://oversight-archive.waxman.house.gov/ documents/ 20081022125014.pdf.
62. McKinsey Global Institute. 2009. Global capital markets: Entering a new era. Washington, DC: McKinsey & Co.
63. Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. 1977. Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83(2): 340-63. http://dx.doi. org/10.1086/226550.
64. Miles, M. B., & Huberman, M. 1994. Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
65. Misangyi, V., Weaver, G., & Elms, H. 2008. Ending corruption: the interplay among institutional logics, resources and institutional entrepreneurs. Academy of Management Review, 33(3): 750-70. http://dx.doi.org/10.5465/AMR. 2008.32465769.
66. Moody's Corporation. 2011. Research and ratings: Independent, objective and expert opinion. http://www.moodys.com/researchandratings, first accessed on 7 March 2011.
67. Moore, D. A., & Lowenstein, G. 2004. Self-interest, automaticity and the psychology of conflict of interest. Social Justice Research, 17: 189-202. http://dx.doi. org/10.1023/B:SORE.0000027409.88372.b4.
68. Moore, D. A., Tetlock, P. E., Tanlu, L., & Bazerman, M. H. 2006. Conflicts of interest and the case of the auditor independence: Moral seduction and strategic issue cycling. Academy of Management Review, 31(1): 10-29. http://dx.doi.org/10.5465/ AMR.2006.19379621.
69. Morgenson, G. 2008. Debt watchdogs: Tamed or caught napping? New York Times, December 7: A1.
70. Morley, A. 1988. Overview of financial analysis. In S. N. Levine (Ed.), The Financial Analysis Handbook: 3-33. Homewood, IL: Irwin.
71. Nicolai, N. T., Schulz, A., & Thomas, T. W. 2010. What Wall Street wants: Exploring the role of security analysts in the evolution and spread of management concepts. Journal of Management Studies, 47(1): 162-89. http://dx.doi. org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2009.00862.x.
72. Oakley, E. F., & Lynch, P. 2000. Promise-keeping: A low priority in a hierarchy of workplace values. Journal of Business Ethics, 27: 377-92. http://dx.doi. org/10.1023/A:1006269828051.
73. Osgood, P. G. 1981. Investor relations in the eighties. Public Relations Journal, 37(4): 6-8.
74. Ostrom, E. 1990. Governing the commons: The evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
75. Pache, A., & Santos, F. 2010. When worlds collide: The internal dynamics of organizational responses to conflicting institutional demands. Academy of Management Review, 35(3): 455-76. http://dx.doi.org/10.5465/AMR.2010. 51142368.
76. Partnoy, F. 2001. The paradox of credit ratings. University of San Diego Law & Economics Research Paper No. 20. University of San Diego Law School, San Diego, CA.
77. Perrow, C. 2010. The meltdown was not an accident. In M. Lounsbury & P. M. Hirsch (Eds.), Markets on trial: The economic sociology of the U.S. financial crisis, part A: 309-30. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
78. Pfarrer, M. D., DeCelles, K. A., Smith, K. G., & Taylor, M. S. 2008. After the fall: Reintegrating the corrupt organization. Academy of Management Review, 33(3): 730-49. http://dx.doi.org/10.5465/AMR.2008.32465757.
79. Phillips, D. J., & Zuckerman, E. W. 2001. Middle-status conformity: Theoretical restatement and empirical demonstration in two markets. American Journal of Sociology, 107(2): 379-429. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/324072.
80. Ramchander, S., Schwebach, R. G., & Staking, K. 2012. The information relevance of corporate social responsibility: Evidence from DS400 Index constructions. Strategic Management Journal, 33: 303-14. http://dx.doi.org/10. 1002/smj.952.
81. Rao, H., & Sivakumar, K. 1999. Institutional sources of boundary spanning structures. Organization Science, 10(1): 27-42. http://dx.doi.org/10. 1287/orsc.10.1.27.
82. Rocks, D. 2011. Who's the greenest of them all? Bloomberg Business Week, November 28-December 4: 59-61.
83. Rojas, F. 2010. Power through institutional work: Acquiring academic authority in the 1968 third world strike. Academy of Management Journal, 53: 1263-80. http:// dx.doi.org/10.5465/AMJ.2010.57317832.
84. Rose, P. 2007. The corporate governance industry. Journal of Corporation Law, 32: 100-41.
85. Rowan, H. A. 1999. Securities acts amendments of 1975. http://www.johnemossfoundation.org/h-rowen.htm, first accessed on 8 March 2011.
86. Sax, I. 2000. Shady side of the street. Investor Relations, January: 35-36.
87. Scott, W. R. 1995. Institutional effects on organizational structure and performance in institutions and organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
88. Securities and Exchange Commission. 2006. Securities Analysts. http://www.sec.gov/ divisions/marketreg/securitiesanalysts.htm, first accessed 1 April 2011.
89. -. 2008. Summary report of issues identified in the commission's staff examinations of select credit rating agencies. http://www.sec.gov/news/studies/ 2008/ craexamination070808.pdf, first accessed 1 April 2011.
90. -.2010. 17 CFR Parts 240, 270, 274, and 275. Concept release on the U.S. proxy system. Release Nos. 34-62495; IA-3052; IC-29340; file no. S7-14-10.
91. Shepherd, D. A., & Sutcliffe, K. M. 2011. Inductive top-down theorizing: A source of new theories of organization. Academy of Management Review, 36: 361-80. http:// dx.doi.org/10.5465/AMR.2011.59330952.
92. Spreitzer, G. M., & Sonenshein, S. 2004. Toward the construct definition of positive deviance. American Behavioral Scientist, 47(6): 828-47. http://dx.doi. org/10.1177/0002764203260212.
93. Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. 1998. Basics of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
94. Strine, Jr., L. E. 2005. The Delaware way: How we do corporate law and some of the new challenges we (and Europe) face. Delaware Journal of Corporate Law, 30: 673-88.
95. Tilcsik, A. 2010. From ritual to reality: Demography, ideology, and decoupling in the post-communist government agency. Academy of Management Journal, 53(6): 1474-98. http://dx.doi.org/10.5465/AMJ.2010.57318905.
96. Time. 1970. Business: The biggest bankruptcy ever. http://www.time.com/ time/magazine/ article/0,9171,878372-1,00.html, first accessed 17 March 2011.
97. Tolbert, P. S., & Zucker, L. G. 1996. The institutionalization of institutional theory? In S. R. Clegg, C. Hardy & Walter R. Nord (Eds.), Handbook of Organization Studies: 175-90. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
98. Trank, C. Q., & Washington, M. 2009. Maintaining an institution in a contested organizational field: The work of the AACSB and its constituents. In T. B. Lawrence, R. Suddaby & B. Leca (Eds.), Institutional work: Actors and agency in institutional studies of organizations: 236-61. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
99. Treviño, L. K., Weaver, G. R., & Reynolds, S. J. 2006. Behavioral ethics in organizations: A review. Journal of Management, 32: 951-90. http://dx.doi. org/10.1177/0149206306294258.
100. Useem, M. 1996. Investor capitalism. New York: Basic Books.
101. Vo, Thuy-Nga T. 2008. Rating management behavior and ethics: A proposal to upgrade the corporate governance rating criteria. Journal of Corporation Law, 34: 1.
102. Westphal, J. D., & Clement, M. B. 2008. Sociopolitical dynamics in relations between top managers and securities analysts: Favor rendering, reciprocity, and analyst stock recommendations. Academy of Management Journal, 51(5): 873-97. http:// dx.doi.org/10.5465/AMJ.2008.34789647.
103. Westphal, J. D., & Zajac, E. J. 1994. Substance and symbolism in CEO's long-term incentive plans. Administrative Science Quarterly, 39(3): 367-90. http://dx.doi. org/10.2307/2393295.
104. -. 2001. Decoupling policy from practice: The case of stock repurchase programs. Administrative Science Quarterly, 46: 202-28. http://dx.doi.org/10. 2307/2667086.
105. Williams, C. C. 2008. Toward a taxonomy of corporate reporting strategies. Journal of Business Communication, 45(3): 232-64. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0021943608317520.
106. Williams, C. C., & Ryan, L.V. 2007. Courting shareholders: The ethical implications of altering corporate ownership structures. Business Ethics Quarterly, 17(4): 669-88. http://dx.doi.org/10.5840/beq20071744.
107. Willoughby, J. 2008. SEC report on ratings agencies falls short. Barron's, 88: 35.
108. Wolfson, J., & Crawford, C. 2010. Lesson from the current financial crisis: Should credit rating agencies be restructured? Journal of Business & Economics Research, 8: 85-91.
109. Womack, K. L. 1996. Do brokerage analysts' recommendations have investment value? Journal of Finance, 51: 137-67. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j. 1540-6261.1996. tb05205.x.
110. Zald, M. N., & Lounsbury. M. 2010. The wizards of Oz: Towards an institutional approach to elites, expertise and command posts. Organization Studies, 31(7): 963-96. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0170840610373201.
111. Zilber, T. B. 2009. Institutional maintenance as narrative acts. In T. B. Lawrence, R. Suddaby & B. Leca (Eds.), Institutional work: Actors and agency in institutional studies of organizations: 205-35. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.