Evolving Mobile Media: Uses and Conceptualizations of the Mobile Internet

Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication

Volumn 18, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 491-507

  Humphreys, Lee ^a   Von Pape, Thilo ^b   Karnowski, Veronika ^c  

^a Department of Molecular Biology and Genetics   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF HOHENHEIM   (Germany)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

Author keywords

Appropriation; Cross cultural; Media use; Mobile internet; Mobile phones; Qualitative

Indexed keywords

APPROPRIATION; CROSS-CULTURAL; CROSS-CULTURAL DIFFERENCES; INTERNET USERS; MEDIA USE; MOBILE INTERNET; MOBILE MEDIA; QUALITATIVE; SEMI STRUCTURED INTERVIEWS; TECHNOLOGICAL CONVERGENCE;

CELLULAR TELEPHONES;

EID: 84880420199     PISSN: None     EISSN: 10836101     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/jcc4.12019     Document Type: Article

References (62)

1. Ajzen, I. (1985). From intentions to actions: A theory of planned behavior. In J. Kuhl & J. Beckman (Eds.), Action-control: From cognition to behavior (pp. 11-39). Heidelberg: Springer.
2. Bakardijeva, M (2005). Internet society: The internet in everyday life. London: Sage.
3. Baron, N. (2010). Introduction to special section: mobile phones in cross-cultural context: Sweden, Estonia, the USA and Japan. New Media & Society, 12(1), 3-11.
4. Berker, T., Hartmann, M., Punie, Y., & Ward, K. J. (Eds.). (2006). Domestication of media and technology. New York: McGraw-Hill.
5. Bijker, W. E., Hughes, T. P., & Pinch, T. J. (Eds.). (1987). The social construction of technological systems: New directions in the sociology and history of technology. Cambridge: MIT Press.
6. Bitkom (2011).NetzgesellschaftEine repräsentative Untersuchung zur Mediennutzungund dem Informationsverhalten der Gesellschaft inDeutschland. Berlin: BITKOM. Retrieved from http://www.bitkom.org/files/documents/BITKOM_Publikation_Netzgesellschaft.pdf
7. Campbell, S. W. (2007). Cross-cultural comparison of perceptions and uses of mobile telephony. New Media & Society, 9(2), 343-363.
8. Chang, S.J., & Rice, R. E. (1993). Browsing: A multidimensional framework. Annual Reviews of Information Science and Technology, 28, 231-276.
9. comScore (2011). Mobile 2010. Year in review. comScore. Retrieved August 2, 2011, from http://www.comscore.com/Press_Events/Presentations_Whitepapers/2011/2010_Mobile_Year_in_Review
10. Cothey, V. (2002). A longitudinal study of World Wide Web users's information-seeking behavior. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 53(2), 67-78.
11. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1975). Play and intrinsic rewards. Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 15(3), 41-63.
12. Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319-340.
13. Donner, J., & Gitau, S. (2009). New paths: Exploring mobile-centric internet use in South Africa. Paper presented at the International Communication Association Preconference on Mobile Communication, Chicago, IL.
14. Donovan, M. (2010). The state of mobile: U.S. mobile media landscape and trends. comScore Webinar, June 9. Retrieved from http://www.comscore.com/Press_Events/Presentations_Whitepapers/2010/The_State_of_Mobile_US_Mobile_Media_Landscape_and_Trends
15. Eveland, W. P., & Dunwoody, S. (2001). Applying research on the uses and cognitive effects of hypermedia to the study of the World Wide Web. In W. B. Gudykunst (Ed.), Communication Yearbook, 25 (pp. 79-113), Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
16. Gergen, K. (2002). The challenge of the absent presence. In J. E. Katz & M. Aakhus (Eds.), Perpetual contact: Mobile communication, private talk, public performance (pp. 227-241). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
17. Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
18. Goffman, E. (1974). Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience. New York: Harper and Row.
19. Greenberg, B. S., Eastin, M. S., Skalski, P., Cooper, L., Levy, M., & Lachlan, K. (2005). Comparing survey and diary measures of internet and traditional media use. Communication Reports, 18(1), 1-8.
20. Haddon, L. (2003). Domestication and mobile telephony. In, J. E. Katz (ed.), Machines that become us: The social context of personal communication technology (pp. 43-56). New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers.
21. Haddon, L. (2004). Cultural differences in communication: Examining patterns of daily life. Mobile Communication and Social Change Conference. Seoul, Korea. Retrieved from http://www2.lse.ac.uk/media@lse/whosWho/AcademicStaff/LeslieHaddon/KoreaPaperCulture.pdf.
22. Haddon, L. (2006). Empirical studies using the domestication framework. In T. Berker, M. Hartmann, Y. Punie & K. J. Ward (Eds.), Domestication of media and technology (pp. 103-122). Maidenhead: Open University Press.
23. Haddon, L. & Kim, S.D. (2007). Mobile phones and web-based social networking-Emerging practices in Korea with Cyworld. The Journal of the Communications Network, 6 (I), 2007.
24. Hill, A. (2010). The state of mobile: EU5 mobile media landscape and trends. comScore Webinar, June 10. Retrieved from http://www.comscore.com/Press_Events/Presentations_Whitepapers/2010/The_State_of_Mobile_EU5_Mobile_Media_Landscape_and_Trends
25. Humphreys, A. (2006). The past, present and future of immersive and extractive ebooks. In P. Messaris & L. Humphreys (Eds.), Digital media: Transformations in human communication (pp. 159-170). New York: Peter Lang.
26. Humphreys, L. (2008). Mobile social networks and social practice: A case study of Dodgeball. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13, 341-360.
27. Innis, H. A. (1951). The bias of communication. Toronto: University of Toronto.
28. ITU (International Telecommunications Union) (2010). The world in 2010. Retrieved from http://www.itu.int/ITU-D/ict/material/FactsFigures2010.pdf.
29. Ishii, K. (2004). Internet use via mobile phone in Japan. Telecommunications Policy, 28, 43-58.
30. Ito, M., Okabe, D., & Matsuda, M. (Eds.). (2005). Personal, portable, pedestrian: Mobile phones in Japanese life. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
31. Katz, J. E., Aakhus, M., Kim, H. D., & Turner, M. (2003). Cross-cultural comparisons of ICTs. In L. Fortunati, J. E. Katz, & R. Riccini (Eds.), Mediating the human body: Technology, communication and fashion (pp. 75-86). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
32. Kim, H., Kim, G. J., Park, H. W., & Rice, R. E. (2007). Configurations of relationships in different media: FtF, email, instant messenger, mobile phone, and SMS. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12(4), article 3.
33. Klang, M. (2008). Internet, Technology of. In W. Donsbach (ed.), International encyclopedia of communication (pp. 2455-2461). Malden: Blackwell Publishing.
34. Koskinen, I., & Kurvinen, E. (2005). Mobile multimedia and users: On the domestication of mobile multimedia. Telektronik, 3(4): 60-68.
35. Larson, R., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1983). The experience sampling method. In H. T. Reis (Ed.), Naturalistic approaches to studying social interaction (pp. 41-56). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
36. Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network-theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
37. Lehtonen, T. (2003). The domestication of new technologies as a set of trials. Journal of Consumer Culture, 3(3), 363-385.
38. Leung, L., & Wei, R. (2000). More than just talk on the move: Uses and gratifications of the cellular phone. Journalism and Mass Media Quarterly, 77(2), 308-320.
39. Licoppe, C., & Smoredab, Z. (2005). Are social networks technologically embedded? How networks are changing today with changes in communication technology. Social Networks, 27(4), 317-335.
40. Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E., G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
41. Ling, R. (2004). The mobile connection: The cell phone's impact on society. San Francisco, Oxford: Elsevier/ Morgan Kaufmann.
42. Lofland, J., Snow, D., Anderson, L., & Lofland, L. H. (2006). Analyzing social settings: A guide to qualitative observation and analysis (4th ed). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing.
43. Marvin, C. (1988). When old technologies were new: Thinking about electric communication in the late nineteenth century. New York: Oxford University Press.
44. Meeker, M., Devit, S. & Wu, L. (2010). "Internet Trends." Retrieved from http://www.morganstanley.com/institutional/techresearch/pdfs/internet_Trends_041210.pdf
45. Metzger, M. J., & Flanagin, A. J. (2002). Audience orientations toward new media. Communication Research Reports, 19(4), 338-351.
46. Meyrowitz, J. (1985). No sense of place. New York: Oxford University Press.
47. Peters, O., & Ben Allouch, S. (2005). Always connected: A longitudinal field study of mobile communication. Telematics & Informatics, 22(3), 239-256.
48. Postman, N. (1971). ?"What is media ecology??" Media Ecology Association. Retrieved from http://www.media-ecology.org/media_ecology/#What is Media Ecology?
49. Purcell, K., Entner, R., & Henderson, N. (2010). The rise of apps culture. Washington, D.C.: Pew internet and American Life Project.
50. Quandt, T., & von Pape, T. (2010). Living in the mediatope: A multi-method study on the evolution of media technologies in the domestic environment. The Information Society, 26(5): 330-345.
51. Rainie, L. (2010). Internet, broadband, and cell phone statistics. Washington, D.C.: Pew internet and American Life Project.
52. Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations (5th ed.). New York: Free Press.
53. Schroeder, R. (2010). Mobile phones and the inexorable advance of multimodal connectedness. New Media and Society, 12 (1), 75-90.
54. Silverstone, R., & Haddon, L. (1996). Design and the domestication of information and communication technologies: Technical change and everyday life. In R. Silverstone & R. Mansell (Eds.), Communication by design: The politics of information and communication technologies (pp. 44-74). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
55. Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425-478.
56. th Annual Conference of the International Communication Association, Chicago.
57. Vuojärvi, H., Isomäki, H., & Hynes, D. (2010). Domestication of a laptop on a wireless university campus: A case study. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 26(2): 250-267.
58. Wei, R. (2008). Motivations for using the mobile phone for mass communications and entertainment. Telematics & Informatics, 25(1), 36-46.
59. West, J. & Mace, M. (2010). Browsing as the killer app: Explaining the rapid success of Apple's iPhone. Telecommunications Policy, 34(5-6), 270-286.
60. Williams, R., & Edge, D. (1996). The social shaping of technology. Research Policy, 25, 856-899.
61. Wirth, W., von Pape, T., & Karnowski, V. (2008). An integrative model of mobile phone appropriation. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communicationn 13(1), 593-617.
62. Zickhur, K. (2011). Generations and their gadgets. Washington DC: Pew Internet & American Life Project.