Audience orientations toward new media

Communication Research Reports

Volumn 19, Issue 4, 2002, Pages 338-351

  Metzger, Miriam J ^a   Flanagin, Andrew J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 35348851545     PISSN: 08824096     EISSN: 17464099     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/08824090209384862     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Abela, D., 1997. Clicking the night away: A uses and gratifications approach to internet use in Malta. Retrieved May 22, 2000 from, http://www.oberonlabs.com/dabela/
2. Blumler, J. G., 1979. The role of theory in uses and gratifications studies. Communication Research, 6: 9–36.
3. DeVellis, R. F., 1991. Scale development: Theory and applications, Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
4. Ferguson, D. A., and Perse, E. M., 2000. The World Wide Web as a functional alternative to television. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 44: 155–174.
5. Flanagin, A. J., and Metzger, M. J., 2001. Internet use in the contemporary media environment. Human Communication Research, 27: 153–181.
6. Flanagin, A. J., and Metzger, M. J., 2000. Perceptions of Internet information credibility. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 77: 515–540.
7. Garramone, G. M., 1984. Audience motivation effect: More evidence. Communication Research, 11: 79–96.
8. Gorsuch, R. L., 1983. Factor analysis, Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
9. Hearn, G., 1989. Active and passive conceptions of the television audience: Effects of a change in viewing routine. Human Relations, 42: 857–875.
10. Jeffries, L., and Atkin, D., 1996. Predicting use of technologies for communication and consumer needs. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 40: 318–330.
11. Kim, J., and Rubin, A. M., 1997. The variable influence of audience activity on media effects. Communication Research, 24: 107–135.
12. King, R. C., and Xia, W. D., 1997. Media appropriateness: Effects of experience on communication media choice. Decision Sciences, 28: 877–910.
13. Levy, M. R., 1987. VCR use and the concept of audience activity. Communication Quarterly, 35(3): 267–275.
14. Levy, M. R., and Windahl, S., 1984. Audience activity and gratifications: A conceptual clarification and exploration. Communication Research, 11: 51–78.
15. Levy, M. R., and Windahl, S., 1985. “ The concept of audience activity ”. In Media gratifications research: Current perspectives, Edited by: Rosengren, K. E., Wenner, L. A., and Palmgreen, P., 109–122. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
16. Neuman, W. R., 1991. The future of the mass audience, Cambridge University Press.
17. Papacharissi, Z., and Rubin, A. M., 2000. Predictors of Internet use. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 44: 175–196.
18. Perse, E. M., 1990a. Audience selectivity and involvement in the newer media environment. Communication Research, 17: 675–697.
19. Perse, E. M., 1990b. Involvement with local television news: Cognitive and emotional dimensions. Human Communication Research, 16: 556–581.
20. Perse, E. M., 1990c. Media involvement and local news effects. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 34: 17–36.
21. Perse, E. M., 1998. Implications of cognitive and affective involvement for channel changing. Journal of Communication, 48: 49–65.
22. Perse, E. M., and Courtright, J. A., 1993. Normative images of communication media: Mass and interpersonal channels in the new media environment. Human Communication Research, 19: 485–503.
23. Perse, E. M., and Dunn, D. G., 1998. The utility of home computers: Implications of multimedia and connectivity. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 42: 435–456.
24. Perse, E. M., and Rubin, A. M., 1988. Audience activity and satisfaction with favorite television soap opera. Journalism Quarterly, 65: 368–375.
25. Pew Research Center for the People and the Press. 1999. The Internet news audience goes ordinary. January 14 Retrieved March 13, 2000 from, http://www.people‐press.org/tech98sum.htm
26. 1997. “ Reno v. American Civil Liberties Union ”. In U. S. Supreme Court Reports Vol. 521, 844
27. Rubin, A. M., 1984. Ritualized and instrumental television viewing. Journal of Communication, 34(3): 67–77.
28. Rubin, A. M., 1993. Audience activity and media use. Communication Monographs, 60: 98–105.
29. Rubin, A. M., 1994. “ Media uses and effects: A uses‐and‐gratifications perspective ”. In Media effects: Advances in theory and research, Edited by: Bryant, J., and Zillmann, D., 417–436. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
30. Rubin, A. M., 1998. “ Personal involvement with the media ”. In Communication: Views from the helm for the 21st century, Edited by: Trent, J. S., 257–263. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
31. Rubin, A. M., and Perse, E. M., 1987a. Audience activity and soap opera involvement: A uses and effects investigation. Human Communication Research, 14: 246–268.
32. Rubin, A. M., and Perse, E. M., 1987b. Audience activity and television news gratifications. Communication Research, 14: 58–84.
33. Rubin, A. M., Perse, E. M., and Powell, R. A., 1985. Loneliness, parasocial interaction, and local news viewing. Human Communication Research, 12: 155–180.
34. Tewksbury, D., and Althaus, S. A., 2000. An examination of motivations for using the World Wide Web. Communication Research Reports, 17(2): 127–138.
35. Tremayne, M., The Internet user: Active, passive, or both?. Paper presented at the 49th annual meeting of the International Communication Association. San Francisco, CA. May.
36. Webster, J. G., and Phalen, P. F., 1994. “ Victim, consumer, or commodity? Audience models in communication policy ”. In Audiencemaking: How the media create the audience, Edited by: Ettema, J. S., and Whitney, D. C., 19–37. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
37. Williams, F., Phillips, A. F., and Lum, P., 1985. “ Gratifications associated with new communication technologies ”. In Media gratifications research: Current perspectives, Edited by: Rosengren, K. E., Wenner, L. A., and Palmgreen, P., 241–252. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.