Mobile social networks and social practice: A case study of dodgeball

Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication

Volumn 13, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 341-360

  Humphreys, Lee ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

SOCIAL SCIENCES COMPUTING;

CASE-STUDIES; MOBILE SOCIAL NETWORKS; NETWORK PRACTICES; PUBLIC SPACE; QUALITATIVE FIELD STUDIES; SOCIAL CONNECTION; SOCIAL COORDINATION; SOCIAL NETWORK SITES; SOCIAL NETWORK SYSTEMS; SOCIAL PRACTICES;

SOCIAL NETWORKING (ONLINE);

EID: 37249070894     PISSN: 10836101     EISSN: 10836101     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00399.x     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Banjo, O., Hu, Y. Sundar, S. S 2006, June). Cell phone usage and social interaction with proximate others: Ringing in a theoretical model. Paper presented at the International Communication Association, Dresden, Germany.
2. Bijker, W. E., Hughes, T. P. Pinch, T. J Eds 1987). The Social Construction of Technological Systems: New Directions in the Sociology and History of Technology. Cambridge, MA : MIT Press.
3. boyd, d 2004). Friendster and publicly articulated social networking. In Proceedings of the ACM CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1279 1282). Vienna, Austria : ACM Press.
4. Couldry, N. McCarthy, A Eds 2004). MediaSpace: Place, Scale, and Culture in a Media Age. London : Routledge.
5. CTIA Cellular and Telecommunication Information Association (2006, December). Semi-annual wireless industry survey. Washington DC. Retrieved July 26, 2007 from http://files.ctia.org/pdf/CTIA_Survey_Year_End_2006_Graphics.pdf
6. Donath, J. boyd, d 2004). Public displays of connection. BT Technology Journal, 22 (4 71 82.
7. Eagle, N. Pentland, A 2005). Social serendipity: Mobilizing social software. IEEE Pervasive Computing, 2 (2 28 34. Retrieved August 1, 2007 from http://reality.media.mit.edu/pdfs/serendipity.pdf
8. Ellison, N., Heino, R. Gibbs, J 2006). Managing impressions online: Self-presentation processes in the online dating environment. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 11 (2 article 2. Retrieved July 24, 2007 from http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol11/issue2/ellison.html.
9. Ellison, N., Steinfield, C. Lampe, C 2007). The benefits of Facebook "friends:" Exploring the relationship between college students' use of online social networks and social capital. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12 (3 article 1. Retrieved July 24, 2007 from http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol12/issue4/ellison.html
10. Gergen, K 2002). The challenge of the absent presence. In J. E. Katz M. Aakhus (Eds Perpetual Contact: Mobile Communication, Private Talk, Public Performance (pp. 227 241). Oxford, UK : Oxford University Press.
11. Glaser, B. G. Strauss, A. L 1967). The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. New York : Aldine de Gruyter.
12. Goffman, E 1959). The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. Garden City, NY : Doubleday Anchor Books.
13. Granovetter, M 1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78 (6 1360 1380.
14. Hampton, K. Wellman, B 1999). Netville online and offline: Observing and surveying a wired suburb. American Behavioral Scientist, 43 (3 475 492.
15. Howard, P. N. Jones, S. G Eds 2004). Society Online: The Internet in Context. Thousand Oaks, CA : Sage Publications.
16. Ito, M., Okabe, D. Matsuda, M Eds 2005). Personal, Portable, Pedestrian: Mobile Phones in Japanese Life. Cambridge, MA : MIT Press.
17. Johnson, S 2005). Friends 2005: Hooking up. Discover, 26, 22 23.
18. Katz, J. E. Aakhus, M Eds 2002). Perpetual Contact: Mobile Communication, Private Talk, Public Performance. New York : Cambridge University Press.
19. Kraut, R., Kiesler, S., Boneva, B., Cummings, J., Helgeson, V. Crawford, A 2002). The Internet paradox revisited. Journal of Social Issues, 58 (1 1017 31.
20. Kraut, R., Patterson, M., Lundmark, V., Kiesler, S., Mukopadhyay, T. Scherlis, W 1998). Internet paradox: A social technology that reduces social involvement and psychological well-being? American Psychologist, 53 (9 1017 1031.
21. Ling, R 2004). The Mobile Connection: The Cell Phone's Impact on Society. San Francisco, CA : Morgan Kaufmann.
22. Ling, R. Yttri, B 2002). Hyper-coordination via mobile phones in Norway. In J. Katz M. Aakhus (Eds Perpetual Contact: Mobile Communication, Private Talk, Public Performance (pp. 139 169). Cambridge, UK : Cambridge University Press.
23. Lofland, L. H 1998). The Public Realm: Exploring the City's Quintessential Social Territory. New York : Aldine De Gruyter.
24. MacKenzie, D. Wajcman, J 2002). The Social Shaping of Technology (2nd ed Buckingham, UK : Open University Press.
25. Marvin, C 1988). When Old Technologies Were New: Thinking About Electric Communication in the Late Nineteenth Century. New York : Oxford University Press.
26. McCarthy, A 2001). Ambient Television: Visual Culture and Public Space. Durham, NC : Duke University Press.
27. McPherson, M., Smith-Lovin, L. Brashears, M. E 2006). Social isolation in America: Changes in core discussion networks over two decades. American Sociological Review, 71, 353 375.
28. MIC Market Intelligence Center 2006, May). Worldwide mobile phone subscriber base expected to reach 3.3 billion by 2010. Taipei, Taiwan. Retrieved July 26, 2007 from http://mic.iii.org.tw/english/report/pop_DocPR.asp?func= pressampDoc_sqno=3693
29. Milgram, S 1992). The familiar stranger: An aspect of urban anonymity. In J. Sabini M. Silver (Eds The Individual in a Social World: Essays and Experiments (pp. 68 71). New York : McGraw-Hill.
30. Oldenburg, R 1991). The Great Good Place: Cafes, Coffee Shops, Community Centers, Beauty Parlors, General Stores, Bars, Hangouts, and How They Get You Through the Day. New York : Paragon House.
31. Paulos, E. Goodman, E 2004, April). The familiar stranger: Anxiety, comfort, and play in public spaces. In Proceedings of the ACM CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 223 230). Vienna : ACM Press.
32. Preece, J 2004). Etiquette online: From nice to necessary. Communications of the ACM, 47 (4 56 61.
33. Puro, J. P 2002). Finland: A mobile culture. In J. E. Katz M. Aakhus (Eds Perpetual contact: Mobile Communication, Private Talk, Public Performance (pp. 19 29). Cambridge, UK : Cambridge University Press.
34. Rogers, E 1995). Diffusion of Innovations (4th ed New York : The Free Press.
35. Townsend, A 2000). Life in the real-time city: Mobile telephones and urban metabolism. Journal of Urban Technology, 7 (2 85 104.
36. University of Michigan, Department of Communication Studies 2006). On the move: The role of cellular communications in American life. Retrieved July 26, 2007 from http://141.211.177.75/UofM/Content/comm/document/OnTheMove.pdf
37. Wang, J. Canny, J 2006). End-user place annotation on mobile devices: A comparative study. In Proceedings of the ACM CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1493 1498). Montreal : ACM Press.
38. Wellman, B 2001). Physical place and cyberplace: The rise of personalized networking. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 25 (2 227 252.
39. Williams, R 1975). Television: Technology and Cultural Form. New York : Schocken Books.
40. Yuan, L. Buckman, R 2006, April 4). Social networking goes mobile: MySpace, Facebook strike deals with cell companies. The Wall Street Journal, p. D1.