A design-based approach to experimental design: Investigating hypotheses about how framing influences transfer

Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning Conference, CSCL

Volumn , Issue PART 1, 2008, Pages 224-231

  Engle, Randi A ^a   Roberts, Sharla ^a   Nguyen, Phi D ^a   Yee, Pamela ^a   Huang, Pauline ^b   Mendelson, Adam ^b   Stornaiuolo, Amy ^b   Abrahamson, Dor ^b   Coburn, Cynthia ^b   Hammer, David ^b   Pea, Roy ^b   Roschelle, Jeremy ^b   Schwartz, Dan ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b Framing Transfer Research Group   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CRITICAL DESIGN; DESIGN-BASED RESEARCH; LEARNING ECOLOGIES;

DESIGN; RESEARCH; STATISTICS;

DESIGN OF EXPERIMENTS;

EID: 84880417644     PISSN: 15734552     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (28)

1. Bransford, J.D., and Schwartz, D.L. (1999). Rethinking transfer: A simple proposal with multiple implications. Review of Research in Education, 24, 61-100.
2. Brown, A. L. (1992). Design experiments: Theoretical and methodological challenges in creating complex interventions in classroom settings. The Journal of Learning Sciences, 2(2), 141-178.
3. Brown, A. L. & Campione, J. C. (1994). Guided discovery in a community of learners. In K. McGilly (Ed.), Classroom lessons: Integrating cognitive theory and classroom practice (pp. 229-270). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
4. Chi, M. T. H. (2000). Self-explaining expository texts: The dual processes of generating inferences and repairing mental models. In R. Glaser (Ed.), Advances in instructional psychology (pp. 161-238). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
5. Chi, M. T. H., Siler, S., Jeong, H., Yamauchi, T., Hausmann, R. G. (2001). Learning from human tutoring. Cognitive Science, 25, 471-533.
6. Cobb, P., Confrey, J., diSessa, A., Lesh, R. & Schauble, L. (2003). Design experiments in educational research. Educational Researcher, 32(1), 9-13.
7. Collins, A., Joseph, D. & Bielaczyc, K. (2004). Design research: Theoretical and methodological issues. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(1), 15-42.
8. Cook, T. D. (2007). Randomized experiments in education: Assessing the objects to doing them. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 16(5), 331-355.
9. Cook, T. & Sinha, V. (2005). Randomized experiments in educational research. In J. L Green, Camilli, G. and P. B. Elmore (Eds.), Handbook of complementary methods in education research (pp. 551-566). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
10. Davis, A. & Rose, D. (2000). The experimental method in psychology. In G. M. Breakwell, S. Hammond & C. Fife-Schaw (Eds.), Research methods in psychology (pp. 42-58). 2nd Edition. London: Sage Publications.
11. Design-Based Research Collective (2003). Design-based research: An emerging paradigm for educational inquiry. Educational Researcher, 32(1), 5-9.
12. diSessa, A. A. & Cobb, P. (2004). Ontological innovation and the role of theory in design experiments. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(1), 77-103.
13. Engle, R. A. (2006). Framing interactions to foster generative learning: A situative account of transfer in a community of learners classroom. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 15(4), 451-498.
14. Erickson, F. & Gutierrez, K. (2002). Culture, rigor, and science in educational research. Educational Researcher, 31(8), 21-24.
15. Greeno, J. G., and Smith., D. R., & Moore, J. L. (1993). Transfer of situated learning. In D. K. Detterman & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), Transfer on trial (pp. 99-127). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
16. Hmelo-Silver, C. E. & Pfeffer, M. G. (2004). Comparing expert and novice understanding of a complex system from the perspective of structures, behaviors, and functions. Cognitive Science, 28, 127-138.
17. Kelly, A. E. (2004). Design research in education: Yes, but is it methodological? Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(1), 115-128.
18. Laboratory of Comparative Human Cognition. (1983). Culture and cognitive development. In P. H. Mussen (Ed.), Handbook of child psychology: Volume 1. History, theory and methods (pp. 295-356). New York: Wiley.
19. Leach, J. (1991). Running applied psychology experiments. Milton Keynes, UK: Open University Press.
20. Maxwell, J. A. (2004). Causal explanation, qualitative research, and scientific inquiry in education. Educational Researcher, 33(2), 3-11.
21. McCandliss, B. D., Kalchman, M. & Bryant, P. (2003). Design experiments and laboratory approaches to learning: Steps towards collaborative exchange. Educational Researcher, 32(1), 14-16.
22. National Research Council (2002). Scientific research in education. Washington DC: National Academies Press.
23. Olson, D. R. (2004). The triumph of hope over experience in the search for "what works": A response to Slavin. Educational Researcher, 33(1), 24-26.
24. Pea, R. D. (1987). Socializing the knowledge transfer problem. International Journal of Educational Research, 11, 639-663.
25. Roschelle, J., Tatar, D. & Kaput, J (in press). Getting to scale with innovations that deeply restructure how students come to know mathematics. In A. E. Kelly & R. Lesh (Eds.), Handbook of innovative design research in science, technology, engineering, mathematics education. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
26. Shadish, W. R., Cook, T. D. & Campbell, D. T. (2002). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin.
27. Slavin, R. E. (2002). Evidence-based education policies: Transforming educational practice and research. Educational Researcher, 31(7), 15-21.
28. Whitehurst, G. R. (2003, April). The Institute of Education Sciences: New wine, new bottles. Talk presented at AERA. Available at: http://ies.ed.gov/ director/speeches2003/04-22/2003-04-22.asp.