Kernel-based extreme learning machine for remote-sensing image classification

Remote Sensing Letters

Volumn 4, Issue 9, 2013, Pages 853-862

  Pal, Mahesh ^a   Maxwell, Aaron E ^b   Warner, Timothy A ^a  

^a WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Alderson Broaddus College   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CLASSIFICATION ACCURACY; COMPUTATION COSTS; COMPUTATIONAL COSTS; EXTREME LEARNING MACHINE; LAND COVER CLASSIFICATION; MACHINE ALGORITHM; REMOTE SENSING IMAGES; USER-DEFINED PARAMETERS;

ALGORITHMS; KNOWLEDGE ACQUISITION; REMOTE SENSING; SUPPORT VECTOR MACHINES;

IMAGE CLASSIFICATION;

ACCURACY ASSESSMENT; ALGORITHM; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS; IMAGE CLASSIFICATION; REMOTE SENSING;

EID: 84880397408     PISSN: 2150704X     EISSN: 21507058     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/2150704X.2013.805279     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Benediktsson, J.A., Swain, P.H., and, Ersoy, O.K. 1990. Neural network approaches versus statistical methods in classification of multisource remote sensing data. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 28: 540-551.
2. Boser, B., Guyon, I., and, Vapnik, V.N. 1992. " A training algorithm for optimal margin classifiers ". In Proceedings of 5th Annual Workshop on Computer Learning Theory, 144-152. Pittsburgh, PA: ACM.
3. Cortes, C., and, Vapnik, V. 1995. Support vector networks. Machine Learning, 20, pp.,: 273-297.
4. Dietterich, T.G. 1998. Approximate statistical tests for comparing supervised classification learning algorithms. Neural Computation, 10: 1895-1923.
5. Foody, G.M. 2004. Thematic map comparison: evaluating the statistical significance of differences in classification accuracy. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 70: 627-633.
6. Foody, G.M., and, Arora, M.K. 1997. An evaluation of some factors affecting the accuracy of classification by an artificial neural network. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 18: 799-810.
7. Foody, G.M., and, Mathur, A. 2004. A relative evaluation of multiclass image classification by support vector machines. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 42: 1335-1343.
8. Huang, C., Davis, L.S., and, Townshend, J.R.G. 2002. An assessment of support vector machines for land cover classification. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 23: 725-749.
9. Huang, G.-B., Ding, X., and, Zhou, H. 2010. Optimization method based extreme learning machine for classification. Neurocomputing, 74: 155-163.
10. Huang, G.-B., Zhou, H., Ding, X., and, Zhang, R. 2012. Extreme learning machine for regression and multiclass classification. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics-Part B: Cybernetics, 42: 513-529.
11. Huang, G.-B., Zhu, Q.-Y., and, Siew, C.-K. 2006. Extreme learning machine: theory and applications. Neurocomputing, 70: 489-501.
12. Kavzoglu, T., and, Mather, P.M. 2003. The use of backpropagating artificial neural networks in land cover classification. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 24: 4907-4938.
13. Lu, D., and, Weng, Q. 2007. A survey of image classification methods and techniques for improving classification performance. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 28: 823-870.
14. Mas, J.F., and, Flores, J.J. 2008. The application of artificial neural networks to the analysis of remotely sensed data. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 29: 617-663.
15. Melgani, F., and, Bruzzone, L. 2004. Classification of hyperspectral remote sensing images with support vector machines. IEEE Transaction of Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 42: 1778-1790.
16. Mountrakis, G., Im, J., and, Ogole, C. 2011. Support vector machines in remote sensing: a review. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 66: 247-259.
17. Pal, M. 2009a. Kernel methods in remote sensing: a review. ISH Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 15: 194-215.
18. Pal, M. 2009b. Extreme learning machine based land cover classification. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 30: 3835-3841.
19. Pal, M., and, Foody, G.M. 2010. Feature selection for classification of hyperspectral data by SVM. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 48: 2297-2306.
20. Pal, M., and, Foody, G.M. 2012. Evaluation of SVM, RVM and SMLR for accurate image classification with limited ground data. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing, 5: 1344-1355.
21. Pal, M., and, Mather, P.M. 2003. An assessment of the effectiveness of decision tree methods for land cover classification. Remote Sensing of Environment, 86: 554-565.
22. Pal, M., and, Mather, P.M. 2004. Assessment of the effectiveness of support vector machines for hyperspectral data. Future Generation Computer Systems, 20: 1215-1225.
23. Pal, M., and, Mather, P.M. 2006. Some issue in classification of DAIS hyperspectral data. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 27: 2895-2916.
24. Serre, D. 2002. Matrices: Theory and Applications, New York: Springer-Verlag).
25. Vapnik, V.N. 1995. The Nature of Statistical Learning Theory, New York: Springer).
26. Waske, B., and, Benediktsson, J.A. 2007. Fusion of support vector machines for classification of multisensor data. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 45: 3858-3866.