Subtractionless first-pass single contrast medium dose peripheral MR angiography using two-point Dixon fat suppression

European Radiology

Volumn 23, Issue 8, 2013, Pages 2228-2235

  Leiner, Tim ^a   Habets, Jesse ^a   Versluis, Bastiaan ^b   Geerts, Liesbeth ^c   Alberts, Eveline ^c   Blanken, Niels ^a   Hendrikse, Jeroen ^a   Vonken, Evert Jan ^a   Eggers, Holger ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER UTRECHT   (Netherlands)

^b MAASTRICHT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^c PHILIPS HEALTHCARE   (United States)

^d PHILIPS RESEARCH LABORATORIES   (Germany)

Author keywords

Arteries; lower extremity; Dixon water fat imaging; Magnetic resonance angiography; Magnetic resonance; technical developments; Peripheral arterial occlusive disease

Indexed keywords

NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING AGENT;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CHILD; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; FEMALE; HUMAN; ILIAC ARTERY; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE QUALITY; IMAGE SUBTRACTION; IMAGING PHANTOM; LEG ARTERY; MAGNETIC FIELD; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; MALE; NOISE; PERIPHERAL OCCLUSIVE ARTERY DISEASE; POPLITEAL ARTERY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SCHOOL CHILD; SIGNAL NOISE RATIO; SUPERFICIAL FEMORAL ARTERY; TIBIAL ARTERY;

ADIPOSE TISSUE; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ANGIOGRAPHY, DIGITAL SUBTRACTION; CHILD; CONTRAST MEDIA; FEASIBILITY STUDIES; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OBSERVER VARIATION; PERIPHERAL ARTERIAL DISEASE; PHANTOMS, IMAGING; SIGNAL-TO-NOISE RATIO; SUBTRACTION TECHNIQUE; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84880389681     PISSN: 09387994     EISSN: 14321084     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00330-013-2833-y     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Leiner T, Kessels AGH, Nelemans PJ, Vasbinder GBC, de Haan MW, Kitslaar PEJHM et al (2005) Peripheral arterial disease: comparison of color duplex US and contrast-enhanced MR angiography for diagnosis. Radiology 235:699-708
2. Nelemans PJ, Leiner T, de Vet HC, van Engelshoven JM (2000) Peripheral arterial disease: meta-analysis of the diagnostic performance of MR angiography. Radiology 217:105-114
3. Koelemay MJ, Lijmer JG, Stoker J, Legemate DA, Bossuyt PM (2001) Magnetic resonance angiography for the evaluation of lower extremity arterial disease: a meta-analysis. JAMA 285:1338-1345
4. Menke J, Larsen J (2010) Meta-analysis: accuracy of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography for assessing steno-occlusions in peripheral arterial disease. Ann Intern Med 153:325-334
5. Ho KY, Leiner T, de Haan MW, Kessels AG, Kitslaar PJ, van Engelshoven JM (1998) Peripheral vascular tree stenoses: evaluation with moving-bed infusion-tracking MR angiography. Radiology 206:683-692
6. Meaney JFM, Ridgway JP, Chakraverty S, Robertson I, Kessel D, Radjenovic A, Kouwenhoven M, Kassner A, Smith MA (1999) Stepping-table gadolinium-enhanced digital subtraction MR angiography of the aorta and lower extremity arteries: preliminary experience. Radiology 211:59-67
7. Leiner T, de Weert TT, Nijenhuis RJ, Vasbinder GB, Kessels AG, Ho KY et al (2001) Need for background suppression in contrast-enhanced peripheral magnetic resonance angiography. J Magn Reson Imaging 14:724-733
8. Dixon WT (1984) Simple proton spectroscopic imaging. Radiology 153:189-194
9. Michaely HJ, Attenberger UI, Dietrich O, Schmitt P, Nael K, Kramer H et al (2008) Feasibility of gadofosveset-enhanced steady-state magnetic resonance angiography of the peripheral vessels at 3 Tesla with Dixon fat saturation. Invest Radiol 43:635-641
10. Leiner T, Ho KY, Nelemans PJ, de Haan MW, van Engelshoven JM (2000) Three-dimensional contrast-enhanced moving-bed infusion-tracking (MoBI-track) peripheral MR angiography with flexible choice of imaging parameters for each field of view. J Magn Reson Imaging 11:368-377
11. Hentsch A, Aschauer MA, Balzer JO, Brossmann J, Busch HP, Davis K et al (2003) Gadobutrol-enhanced moving-table magnetic resonance angiography in patients with peripheral vascular disease: a prospective, multi-centre blinded comparison with digital subtraction angiography. Eur Radiol 13:2103-2114
12. Eggers H, Brendel B, Duijndam A, Herigault G (2010) Dual-echo Dixon imaging with flexible choice of echo times. Magn Reson Med 65:96-107
13. Reeder SB, Wen Z, Yu H, Pineda AR, Gold GE, Markl M, Pelc NJ (2004) Multi-coil Dixon chemical species separation with an iterative least-squares estimation method. Magn Reson Med 51:35-45
14. Li CQ, Chen W, Beatty PJ, Brau AC, Hargreaves B, Busse RF et al (2010) SNR quantification with phased-array coils and parallel imaging for 3D-FSE. Proceedings of the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, 19th annual meeting, Stockholm, p 552
15. Fleiss J, Cohen J (1973) The equivalence of weighted kappa and the intraclass correlation coefficient as measures of reliability. Educ Psychol Meas 33:613-619
16. Leiner T (2005) Magnetic resonance angiography of abdominal and lower extremity vasculature. Top Magn Reson Imaging 16:21-66
17. Haneder S, Attenberger UI, Schoenberg SO, Loewe C, Arnaiz J, Michaely HJ (2012) Comparison of 0.5 M gadoterate and 1.0 M gadobutrol in peripheral MRA: a prospective, single-center, randomized, crossover, double-blind study. J Magn Reson Imaging 36:1213-1221
18. Attenberger UI, Haneder S, Morelli JN, Diehl SJ, Schoenberg SO, Michaely HJ (2010) Peripheral arterial occlusive disease: evaluation of a high spatial and temporal resolution 3-T MR protocol with a low total dose of gadolinium versus conventional angiography. Radiology 257:879-887