Socio-technical inertia: Understanding the barriers to electric vehicles

Energy Policy

Volumn 60, Issue , 2013, Pages 531-539

  Steinhilber, Simone ^a   Wells, Peter ^b   Thankappan, Samarthia ^c  

^a FRAUNHOFER INSTITUTE FOR SYSTEMS AND INNOVATION RESEARCH ISI   (Germany)

^b CARDIFF UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF YORK   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Electric vehicles; Socio technical systems; Transitions management

Indexed keywords

ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES; INFRASTRUCTURE INVESTMENT; MARKET PENETRATION; NEW TECHNOLOGIES; SOCIOTECHNICAL; SOCIOTECHNICAL SYSTEMS; STRATEGIC NICHE MANAGEMENT; TRANSPORT SECTORS;

AIR QUALITY; AUTOMOTIVE INDUSTRY; CLIMATE CHANGE; ELECTRIC UTILITIES; INVESTMENTS; NOISE POLLUTION; URBAN GROWTH; URBAN TRANSPORTATION;

ELECTRIC VEHICLES;

ELECTRIC VEHICLE; ELECTRIFICATION; ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUE; INNOVATION; RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT; STAKEHOLDER; TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENT; TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM; TRAVEL DEMAND;

GERMANY; UNITED KINGDOM;

EID: 84880331630     PISSN: 03014215     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2013.04.076     Document Type: Article

References (95)

1. Abernathy W., Utterback J. Patterns of industrial innovation. Technology Review 1978, 80(7):40-47.
2. Bagozzi R.P., Davis F.D., Warshaw P.R. Development and test of a theory of technological learning and usage. Human Relations 1992, 45:660-686.
3. Bean, J., Dunn, K., Halbright, R., Hosteller, O., 2011. Electric vehicle charging infrastructure in the city of Berkeley. Available from [accessed 19 March 2013]. http://www.cityofberkeley.info/uploadedFiles/Public_Works/Commissions/Commission_for_Transportation/B4Presidio%20Report%20on%20Electric%20Vehicle%20Charging%20in%20Berkeley.pdf.
4. Beise M., Cleff T. Assessing the lead market potential of countries for innovation projects. Journal of International Management 2004, 10:453-477.
5. Beise, M., Rennings, K., 2003. Lead Markets of Environmental Innovations: A Framework for Innovation and Environmental Economics. ZEW Discussion Paper no. 03-01, Mannheim.
6. Beise M., Rennings K. Lead markets and regulation: a framework for analyzing the international diffusion of environmental innovations. Ecological Economics 2005, 52:5-17.
7. Bento A., Goulder L., Jacobsen M., von Haefen R. Distributional and efficiency impacts of increased US gasoline taxes. The American Economic Review 2009, 99(3):667-699.
8. Berger, R., 2011. Automotive landscape 2025: opportunities and challenges ahead. Copy obtained from (11th Feb 2013). http://www.rolandberger.com/expertise/industries/automotive/2011-02-28-rbsc-pub%20automotive_landscape_2025.html.
9. Berggren C., Magnusson T., Sushandoyo D. Hybrids, diesel or both? The forgotten technological competition for sustainable solutions in the global automotive industry. International Journal of Automotive Technology and Management 2010, 9(2):148-173.
10. Bougheas S., Demetriades P., Mamuneas T. Infrastructure, specialization, and economic growth. Canadian Journal of Economics 2000, 33(2):506-522.
11. Browne D., O'Mahony M., Caulfield B. How should barriers to alternative fuels and vehicles be classified and potential policies to promote innovative technologies be evaluated?. Journal of Cleaner Production 2012, 35:140-151.
12. Bruckner E., Ebeling W., Jimenez Montano M. Nonlinear stochastic effects of substitution- an evolutionary approach. Journal of Evolutionary Economics 1996, 6(1):1-30.
13. Chetty R., Looney A., Kroft K. Salience and taxation: theory and evidence. American Economic Review 2007, 99(4):1145-1177.
14. Dalle J. Heterogeneity versus externalities in technological competition: a tale of possible technological landscapes. Journal of Evolutionary Economics 1997, 7:395-413.
15. Davis F.D. Perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly 1989, 13(3):319-340.
16. Davis F.D., Bagozzi R.P., Warshaw P.R. User acceptance of computer technology: a comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science 1989, 35(8):982-1003.
17. Desanctis G., Poole M.S. Capturing the complexity in advanced technology use: adaptive structuration theory. Organization Science 1994, 5(2):121-147.
18. Dijk M., Yarime M. The emergence of hybrid-electric cars: innovation path creation through co-evolution of supply and demand. Technological Forecasting & Social Change 2010, 77(8):1371-1390.
19. Edquist C. Innovation policy-a systemic approach. The Globalizing Learning Economy 2002, 219-238. Oxford University Press, Oxford. D. Archibugi, B. Lundvall (Eds.).
20. EFTE (European Federation for Transport and Environment), 2009. How to avoid an electric shock Electric cars: from hype to reality. Available at [accessed on 9th August 2012]. http://www.transportenvironment.org/sites/te/files/media/2009%2011%20Electric%20Sh%20ck%20Electric%20Cars.pdf.
21. Elzen B., Geels F., Green K. System Innovation and the Transition to Sustainability: Theory, Evidence and Policy 2004, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham.
22. Ewing G., Sarigollu E. Assessing consumer preferences for clean-fuel vehicles a discrete choice experiment. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing 2000, 19(1):106-118.
23. Faber A., Frenken K. Models in evolutionary economics and environmental policy. Towards an evolutionary environmental economics. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 2009, 76:462-470.
24. Fernald J. Roads to prosperity-assessing the link between public capital and productivity. American Economic Review 1999, 89(3):619-638.
25. Finkelstein A. E-Z tax: tax salience and tax rates. Quarterly Journal of Economics 2009, 124(3):969-1011.
26. Foster R.N. Innovation: The Attackers' Advantage 1986, Macmillan, London.
27. Gardner B., Abraham C. What drives car use? A grounded theory analysis of commuters' reasons for driving. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour 2007, 10:187-200.
28. Geels F.W. Technological transitions as evolutionary reconfiguration processes: a multi-level perspective and a case-study. Research Policy 2002, 31:1257-1274.
29. German Federal Government, 2010. Etablierung der Nationalen Plattform Elektromobilität am 3. Mai 2010-Gemeinsame Erklärung von Bundesregierung und deutscher Industrie. Berlin: Die Bundesregierung.
30. Giordana V., Fulli G. A business case for smart grid technologies: a systemic perspective. Energy Policy 2012, 40:252-259.
31. Heffner R., Kurani K., Turrentine T. Symbolism in California's early market for hybrid electric vehicles. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment 2007, 12:396-413.
32. Heise, B.L., 2010. Elektromobilität: ADAC wirft Politik und Wirtschaft Versagen vor. 6 May 2010. Available at [accessed 26 August 2012]. http://www.heise.de/autos/artikel/Elektromobilitaet-ADAC-wirft-Politik-und%20Wirtschaft-Versagen-vor-995105.html.
33. Holweg M., Davies P., Podpolny D. The Competitive Status of the UK Automotive Industry 2009, Picsie Books, Buckingham.
34. Hoogma R., Kemp R., Schot J., Truffer B. Experimenting for Sustainable Transport: The Approach of Strategic Niche Management 2002, Spon Press, London.
35. Hulten C., Bennathan E., Srinivasan S. Infrastructure, externalities, and economic development-a study of Indian manufacturing industry. The World Bank Economic Review 2006, 20(2):291-308.
36. Hutton M., Hutton T. Legal and regulatory impediments to Vehicle-to-grid aggregation. William and Mary Environmental Law and Policy Review 2012, 36(2):337-366.
37. International Transport Forum Transport Outlook 2010: The Potential for Innovation 2010, OECD, Paris.
38. Janssen M., Jager W. Simulating diffusion of green products. Coevolution of firms and consumers. Journal of Evolutionary Economics 2002, 12:283-306.
39. Jessop B. Regulation theories in retrospect and prospect. Economy and Society 1990, 19(2):153-216.
40. Jonard N., Yildizoglu M. Technological diversity in an evolutionary industry model with localized learning and network externalities. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics 1998, 9(1):35-55.
41. Jorgensen K. Technologies for electric, hybrid and hydrogen vehicles: electricity from renewable energy sources in transport. Utilities Policy 2008, 16:72-79.
42. Kemp R. Environmental Policy and Technological Change: A Comparison of the Technological Impact of Policy Instruments 1997, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham.
43. A Socio-Technical Analysis of Sustainable Transport 2012, Routledge, New York. R. Kemp, F.W. Geels, G. Dudley, G. Lyons (Eds.).
44. Kemp R., Loorbach D. Transition management: a reflexive governance approach. Reflexive Governance for Sustainable Development 2006, 103-130. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham. J. Vosz, D. Bauknecht, R. Kemp (Eds.).
45. Kemp R., Rip A., Schot J. Constructing transition paths through the management of niches. Path Dependence and Creation 2001, 269-299. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ. R. Garud, P. Karnoe (Eds.).
46. Kemp R., Schot J., Hoogma R. Regime shifts to sustainability through processes of niche formation: the approach of strategic niche management. Technology Analysis and Strategic Management 1998, 10:175-196.
47. Kemp R., Schot J., Hoogma R. Regime shifts to sustainability through processes of niche formation: the approach of strategic niche management. Technology Analysis and Strategic Management 2000, 10:175-195.
48. King, J., 2007. The king review of low-carbon cars. Part I: the potential for CO2 reduction. London: HM Treasury, Available at [accessed 17 September 2012]. http://hm-treasury.gov.uk/king.
49. King, J., 2008. The king review of low-carbon cars. Part II: Recommendations for action. London: HM Treasury, Available at [accessed 17 September 2012]. http://hm-treasury.gov.uk/king.
50. Kley F., Lerch C., Dallinger D. New business models for electric cars-a holistic approach. Energy Policy 2011, 39:3392-3403.
51. Klier T., Linn J. The price of gasoline new vehicle fuel economy: evidence from monthly sales data. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy 2010, 2(3):134-153.
52. Laclau E., Mouffe C. Hegemony and Socialist Strategy 1985, Verso, London.
53. Lamble B. Of nesting dolls and Trojan horses: a survey of legal and policy issues attendant to vehicle-to-grid battery electric vehicles. Chicago Kent Law Review 2011, 193-233.
54. Lane B., Potter S. The adoption of cleaner vehicles in the UK: exploring the consumer attitude-action gap. Journal of Cleaner Production 2007, 15(11-12):1085-1092.
55. Levinthal D. The slow pace of rapid technological change: gradualism and punctuation in technological change. Industrial and Corporate Change 1998, 7(2):217-247.
56. Loorbach D. Transition Management. New Mode of Governance for Sustainable Development 2007, International Books, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
57. Loorbach D., Kemp R. Transition management for the Dutch energy transition: the multilevel governance aspects. Managing the Transition to Renewable Energy: Theory and Practice from Local, Regional, and Macro Perspectives 2007, 243-264. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham. J. van den Bergh, F. Bruinsma (Eds.).
58. Magnusson T., Berggren C. Entering an era of ferment - radical vs incrementalist strategies in automotive power train development. Technology Analysis and Strategic Management 2011, 23(3):313-330.
59. Malerba F., Nelson R., Orsenigo L., Winter S. Demand, innovation and the dynamics of market structure: the role of experimental users and diverse preferences. Journal of Evolutionary Economics 2007, 17:371-399.
60. Mann E., Abraham C. The role of affect in UK commuters' travel mode choices: an interpretative phenomenological analysis. British Journal of Psychology 2006, 97:155-176.
61. Metcalfe, J., Georghiou, L., 1998. Equilibrium and Evolutionary Foundations of Technology Policy. STI Review No. 22, OECD.
62. Millberg J., Schlenker A. Plug into the future. Power and Energy Magazine, IEEE 2011, 9(1):56-65.
63. Nill, J., Zundel, S., 2001. Die Rolle von Vielfalt für Zeitstrategien ökologischer Innovationspolitik [The role of diversity for time strategies of ecological innovation policy]. Zeitschrift für angewandte Umweltforschung [Journal of Environmental Research], special issue 13/2001, Spehl, H., Held, M. (Eds.). Vom Wert der Vielfalt. Diversität in Ökonomie und Ökologie [The Value of Diversity in Economy and Ecology], 148-157.
64. Orlikowski W.J. The duality of technology: rethinking the concept of technology in organizations. Organization Science 1992, 3(3):398-427.
65. Parker, R., West, A., Fertig, S., 2012. Electric vehicle charging station infrastructure community needs assessment. Available from [accessed 19 March 2013]. http://hdl.handle.net/1794/12194.
66. Porter M., van der Linde C. Toward a new conception of the environment competitiveness relationship. Journal of Economic Perspectives 1995, 9(4):97-118.
67. Ralston M., Nigro N. Plug-in electric vehicles: literature review. Pew Center on Global Climate Change 2011.
68. Raven R. Strategic Niche Management for Biomass 2005, Eindhoven University, The Netherlands.
69. Raven R. Towards alternative trajectories? Reconfigurations in the Dutch electricity regime. Research Policy 2006, 35:581-595.
70. Reichel M. Markteinführung von erneuerbaren Energien. Lock-out-Effekte und innovations politische Konsequenzen für die elektrische Wind- und Solarenergienutzung [Market Introduction of Renewable Energy. Lock-out Effects and Corresponding Innovation Policies for Wind- and Solar-based Electricity] 1998, Deutscher Universitätsverlag, Wiesbaden, Germany.
71. Rip A. A quasi-evolutionary model of technological development and a cognitive approach to technology policy. Rivista di Studi Epistemologici e Sociali Sulla Scienza e la Tecnologia 1992, 2:69-103.
72. Rogers E. The Diffusion of Innovations 1995, The Free Press, New York.
73. Rosenberg N. Inside the Black Box: Technology and Economics. Cambridge, MA 1982, Cambridge University Press.
74. Rotmans J., Kemp R., van Asselt M. More evolution than revolution: transition management in public policy. Foresight 2001, 3:15-31.
75. Rotmans J., Kemp R., van Asselt M., Geels F., Verbong G., Molendijk K. Transitions and transition management: the case of an emission-poor energy supply. ICIS (International Centre for Integrative Studies), Maastricht 2000.
76. Sallee J. The surprising incidence of tax credits for Toyota Prius. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy 2011, 3(2):189-219.
77. Schiffbauer, M., 2007. Calling for innovations- infrastructure and sources of growth. Working paper dynamic regions in a knowledge driven Global Economy (DYNREG) Lessons and policy implications for the EU. Available from [Accessed 12 March 2013]. http://www.esri.ie/research/research_areas/international_economics/dynreg/papers/WorkingPaper_No._18.pdf.
78. Schot J., Elzen B, Hoogma R. Strategies for shifting technological systems the case of the automobile system. Futures 1994, 26:1060-1076.
79. Schot, J., Slob, A., Hoogma, R., 1996. The Implementation of Sustainable Technology as a Strategic Niche Management Problem. Report for the Dutch National Program on Sustaianble Technology (in Dutch).
80. Sovacool B., Hirsh R. Beyond batteries: an examination of the benefits and barriers to plug-in hybrid electric vehicles (PHEVs) and a vehicle-to-grid (V2G) transition. Energy Policy 2008, 37:1095-1103.
81. Strauss A., Corbin J. Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory 1998, Sage, London.
82. Teece D.J. Business models, business strategy and innovation. Long Range Planning 2010, 43:172-194.
83. Turnheim B., Geels F.W. Regime destabilisation as the flipside of energy transitions: lessons from the history of the British coal industry (1913-1997). Energy Policy 2012, 50:35-49.
84. Urry J. Mobilities 2007, Polity Press, London.
85. van Eijck J., Romijn H. Prospects for jatropha biofuels in Tanzania: an analysis with Strategic Niche Management. Energy Policy 2008, 36(1):311-325.
86. van den Bergh J., van Leeuwen E., Oosterhuis F., Rietveld P., Verhoef E. Social learning by doing in sustainable transport innovations: ex-post analysis of common factors behind successes and failures. Research Policy 2007, 36:247-259.
87. van der Laak W., Raven R., Verbong G. Strategic niche management for biofuels: analysing past experiments for developing new biofuel policies. Energy Policy 2007, 35(6):3213-3225.
88. Weber M., Dorda A. Strategic niche management: a tool for the market introduction of new transport concepts and technologies. The IPTS Report 1999, 31:20-28.
89. Weber M., Hoogma R., Lane B., Schot J. Experimenting with Sustainable Transport Innovations: A Workbook for Strategic Niche Management 1999, Universiteit Twente, Seville/Enschede.
90. Weisbuch G., Buskens V., Vuong L. Heterogeneity and increasing returns may drive socio-economic transitions. Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory 2008, 14:376-390.
91. Wells P. Converging transport policy, industrial policy and environmental policy: the implications for localities and social equity. Local Economy 2012, 27(7):747-761.
92. Windrum P., Birchenhal l.C. Is life cycle theory a special case?: dominant designs and emergence of market niches through coevolutionary learning. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics 1998, 9:109-134.
93. Windrum P., Birchenhal l.C. Structural change in the presence of network externalities: a co-evolution of technological successions. Journal of Evolutionary Economics 2005, 15:123-148.
94. Zapata C., Nieuwenhuis P. Exploring Innovation in the automotive industry: new technologies for cleaner cars. Journal of Cleaner Production 2010, 18:14-20.
95. Zundel S., Erdmann G., Kemp R., Nill J., Sartorius C. Conclusions-a time-strategic ecological innovation policy. Time Strategies, Innovation and Environmental Policy 2005, 322-348. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham. C. Sartorius, S. Zundel (Eds.).