A novel method of quantitative risk assessment based on grid difference of pipeline sections

Safety Science

Volumn 59, Issue , 2013, Pages 219-226

  Ma, Lei ^a   Li, Yongshu ^b   Liang, Lei ^b   Li, Manchun ^a   Cheng, Liang ^a  

^a NANJING UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b SOUTHWEST JIAOTONG UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Grid difference of pipeline sections (GDPSs); Network model; Pipeline fatal length; Quantitative risk assessment; Risk contour line

Indexed keywords

CONTOUR LINE; FATAL LENGTH; NETWORK MODELS; PIPELINE SECTIONS; QUANTITATIVE RISK ASSESSMENT;

ACCIDENTS; CONTOUR MEASUREMENT; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK MANAGEMENT; VAPORS;

NATURAL GAS PIPELINES;

ARTICLE; CHEMICAL ACCIDENT; COMBUSTION; DANGEROUS GOODS; EXPLOSION; FIRE; GAS TURBINE POWER; GASES, FUMES, VAPORS AND RELATED PHENOMENA; GRID DIFFERENCE OF PIPELINE SECTIONS; PIPELINE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; RISK ASSESSMENT; URBAN AREA;

EID: 84880330213     PISSN: 09257535     EISSN: 18791042     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ssci.2013.04.012     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. API (American Petroleum Institute). 1990. Recommended practice 521. third ed. API RP 521, Washington.
2. API (American Petroleum Institute). 2001. Base resource document-risk-based inspection. API RP 581, Washington.
3. Arnaldos J., Casal J., Montiel H. Design of a computer tool for the evaluation of the consequences of accidental natural gas releases in distribution pipes. J. Loss Prevent. Process Ind. 1998, 11:135-148.
4. Cui H., Xu Z.S., Song W.H. Quantitative comparative analysis on explosion and poisoning accidents of artificial gas. J. Catastrophe 2008, 23:96-100.
5. Dong Y.H., Gao H.L., Zhou J.E., Feng Y.R. Mathematical modeling of gas release through holes in pipelines. Chem. Eng. J. 2003, 92:237-241.
6. EGIG (European Gas Pipeline Incident Data Group). 2008. Gas pipeline incidents 7th report 1970-2007.
7. Han Z.Y., Weng W.G. An overview of quantitative risk analysis methods for natural gas pipelines. China Safety Sci. J. 2009, 19(7):154-164.
8. Han Z.Y., Weng W.G. An integrated quantitative risk analysis method for natural gas pipeline network. J. Loss Prevent. Process Ind. 2010, 23(3):428-436.
9. Han Z.Y., Weng W.G. Comparison study on qualitative and quantitative risk assessment methods for urban natural gas pipeline network. J. Hazard. Mater. 2011, 189:509-518.
10. HSE. 2010. Methods of Approximation and Determination of Human Vulnerability for Offshore Major Accident Hazard Assessment. Health and Safety Executive.
11. Hu J.Q., Zhang L.B., Ma L., Liang W. An integrated method for safety pre-warning of complex system. Safety Sci. 2010, 48:580-597.
12. Jaffee A., Suardina A., McPhate J. Fire and explosion assessment on oil and gas floating production storage offloading (FPSO): an effective screening and comparison tool. Process Safety Environ. Protection 2009, 87(3):147-160.
13. Jing, H.Y., Hao, J.B., Han, B., Wu, Z.Z., 2009. Semi-quantitative assessment technology of geohazard risk for pipeline. In: International Conference on Pipelines and Trenchless Technology, Shanghai, pp. 821-830.
14. Jo Y.D., Ahn B.J. A method of quantitative risk assessment for transmission pipeline carrying natural gas. J. Hazard. Mater. 2005, 123(1):1-12.
15. Jo Y.D., Crowl D.A. Individual risk analysis of high-pressure natural gas pipelines. J. Loss Prevent. Process Ind. 2008, 21(6):589-595.
16. Joel K., Duncan S. A practical approach to fire hazard analysis for offshore structures. J. Hazard. Mater. 2003, 104:107-122.
17. John, M., Chris, B., Andrew, P., Charlotte, T., 2001. An assessment of measures in use for gas pipeline to mitigate against damage caused by third party activity. Printed and Published by the Health and Safety, Executive, C1 10/01.
18. Jonkman S.N., Gelder P.H.A.J.M., Vrijling J.K. An overview of quantitative risk measures for loss of life and economic damage. J. Hazard. Mater. 2003, 99(1):1-30.
19. Liu M., Liu F. Risk assessment of urban gas pipeline. J. Nat. Disasters 2009, 18(4):84-86.
20. Mark O., Wennberg C., Wennberg T.V., Rabbi F., Albinsson B. Risk analyses for sewer systems based on numerical modelling and GIS. Safety Sci. 1998, 30(1):99-106.
21. Mercedes G.M., Luis Z., Joaquim C. Jet fires and the domino effect. Fire Safety J. 2008, 43:583-588.
22. Metropolo, P.L., Brown, A.E.P., 2004. Natural gas pipeline accident consequence analysis. In: 3rd International Conference on Computer Simulation in Risk Analysis & Hazard Mitigation, Sintra, Portugal.
23. Montiel H., Vilchez J.A., Amaldos J. Historical analysis of accidents in the transportation of natural gas. J. Hazard. Mater. 1996, 51:77-92.
24. Muhlbauer, W.K., 2004. Pipeline risk management manual. third ed. Gulf Publishing Company, Burlington, ISBN 0-7506-7579-9.
25. Si H., Ji H., Zeng X.J. Quantitative risk assessment model of hazardous chemicals leakage and application. Safety Sci. 2012, 50(7):1452-1461.
26. Sklavounos S., Rigas F. Estimation of safety distances in the vicinity of fuel gas. J. Loss Prevent. Process Ind. 2006, 19:24-31.
27. Stephens, M.J., 2000. A model for sizing high consequence areas associated with natural gas pipelines. In: Proceedings of IPC 02 '4th International Pipelines Conference, Calgary.
28. TNO. 1989. Methods for the Determination of Possible Damage. TNO Green Book, Netherlands.
29. TNO Guideline for Quantitative Risk Assessment Committee for the Prevention of Disasters 1999, TNO Purple Book, Netherlands.
30. Xiang, X.Q., Dai, L.H., Cao, T., Zhang, H.B., 2011. Improved risk assessment of pipeline based on fault tree quantitative analysis. In: International Conference on Pipelines and Trenchless Technology, Beijing, pp. 1705-1711.
31. Xing, Z.X., Ren, F., Liu, W., 2009. A quantitative method of risk assessment of natural gas pipeline. In: International Conference on Pipelines and Trenchless Technology, Shanghai, pp. 821-830.
32. Xu Y.B., Qian X.M., Liu Z.Y. Quantitative risk analysis on the leakage of compressed natural gas pipeline. China Safety Science Journal 2008, 18(1):146-148.
33. Ying K.M., Zhang Z.G. Design and Build for Gas Pipeline Map and Information Management System based on GIS Technology 2006, Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai.
34. Zhang, H.X., Ren, C.Y., Liao, K.X., 2011. Oil & Gas pipeline quantitative risk assessment System development with the intermediate database technology. In: International Conference on Pipelines and Trenchless Technology, Beijing, pp. 569-577.