Proteomic and genomic approaches reveal critical functions of H3K9 methylation and heterochromatin protein-1γ in reprogramming to pluripotency

Nature Cell Biology

Volumn 15, Issue 7, 2013, Pages 872-882

  Sridharan, Rupa ^a,d   Gonzales Cope, Michelle ^b   Chronis, Constantinos ^a   Bonora, Giancarlo ^a   McKee, Robin ^a   Huang, Chengyang ^a   Patel, Sanjeet ^a   Lopez, David ^a   Mishra, Nilamadhab ^c   Pellegrini, Matteo ^a   Carey, Michael ^a   Garcia, Benjamin A ^b   Plath, Kathrin ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

^c WAKE FOREST SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AND PUBLIC HEALTH   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

HETEROCHROMATIN PROTEIN 1; HETEROCHROMATIN PROTEIN 1 GAMMA; HISTONE H3; HISTONE METHYLTRANSFERASE; LYSINE; PROTEIN EHMT1; PROTEIN EHMT2; PROTEIN SETDB1; TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR NANOG; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ANIMAL CELL; ARTICLE; CELL TRANSFORMATION; CHROMATIN; CONTROLLED STUDY; EMBRYO; EMBRYONIC STEM CELL; FEMALE; FIBROBLAST; GENOME ANALYSIS; GENOMICS; HISTONE METHYLATION; HISTONE MODIFICATION; MALE; MOUSE; NANOG GENE; NONHUMAN; PLURIPOTENT STEM CELL; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN DEPLETION; PROTEIN FUNCTION; PROTEIN LOCALIZATION; PROTEIN PROTEIN INTERACTION; PROTEOMICS; REGULATORY MECHANISM; TRANSCRIPTION ELONGATION; TRANSCRIPTION INITIATION; TRANSCRIPTION INITIATION SITE;

ANIMALS; CELLS, CULTURED; CHROMATIN; CHROMATIN IMMUNOPRECIPITATION; CHROMOSOMAL PROTEINS, NON-HISTONE; DNA METHYLATION; EMBRYO, MAMMALIAN; EMBRYONIC STEM CELLS; EPIGENESIS, GENETIC; FEMALE; FIBROBLASTS; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION, DEVELOPMENTAL; GENOMICS; HISTONE-LYSINE N-METHYLTRANSFERASE; HISTONES; HOMEODOMAIN PROTEINS; INDUCED PLURIPOTENT STEM CELLS; MALE; MICE; NUCLEAR REPROGRAMMING; PROTEIN PROCESSING, POST-TRANSLATIONAL; PROTEOMICS; TRANSCRIPTION INITIATION SITE;

EID: 84880329213     PISSN: 14657392     EISSN: 14764679     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/ncb2768     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Plath, K. & Lowry, W. E. Progress in understanding reprogramming to the induced pluripotent state. Nat. Rev. Genet. 12, 253-265 (2011).
2. Takahashi, K. & Yamanaka, S. Induction of pluripotent stem cells from mouse embryonic and adult -broblast cultures by de-ned factors. Cell 126, 663-676 (2006).
3. Mikkelsen, T. S. et al. Dissecting direct reprogramming through integrative genomic analysis. Nature 454, 49-55 (2008).
4. Ang, Y-S. et al. Wdr5 mediates self-renewal and reprogramming via the embryonic stem cell core transcriptional network. Cell 145, 183-197 (2011).
5. Gaspar-Maia, A. et al. Chd1 regulates open chromatin and pluripotency of embryonic stem cells. Nature 460, 863-868 (2009).
6. Singhal, N. et al. Chromatin-remodeling components of the baf complex facilitate reprogramming. Cell 141, 943-955 (2010).
7. Wang, T. et al. The histone demethylases Jhdm1a/1b enhance somatic cell reprogramming in a vitamin-C-dependent manner. Cell Stem Cell 9, 575-587 (2011).
8. Liang, G., He, J. & Zhang, Y. Kdm2b promotes induced pluripotent stem cell generation by facilitating gene activation early in reprogramming. Nat. Cell Biol. 14, 457-466 (2012).
9. Onder, T. T. et al. Chromatin-modifying enzymes as modulators of reprogramming. Nature 483, 598-602 (2012).
10. Chen, J. et al. H3K9 methylation is a barrier during somatic cell reprogramming into iPSCs. Nature Genet. 45, 34-42 (2013).
11. Sou-, A., Donahue, G. & Zaret, K. S. Facilitators and impediments of the pluripotency reprogramming factors' initial engagement with the genome. Cell 151, 994-1004 (2012).
12. Mattout, A., Biran, A. & Meshorer, E. Global epigenetic changes during somatic cell reprogramming to iPS cells. J. Mol. Cell Biol. 3, 341-350 (2011).
13. Maherali, N. et al. Directly reprogrammed -broblasts show global epigenetic remodeling and widespread tissue contribution. Cell Stem Cell 1, 55-70 (2007).
14. Chin, M. H. et al. Induced pluripotent stem cells and embryonic stem cells are distinguished by gene expression signatures. Cell Stem Cell 5, 111-123 (2009).
15. Sridharan, R. et al. Role of the murine reprogramming factors in the induction of pluripotency. Cell 136, 364-377 (2009).
16. Garcia, B. A. et al. Chemical derivatization of histones for facilitated analysis by mass spectrometry. Nat. Protoc. 2, 933-938 (2007).
17. Plazas-Mayorca, M. D. et al. One-pot shotgun quantitative mass spectrometry characterization of histones. J. Proteome Res. 8, 5367-5374 (2009).
18. Wang, Z. et al. Combinatorial patterns of histone acetylations and methylations in the human genome. Nat. Genet. 40, 897-903 (2008).
19. Karmodiya, K. et al. H3K9 and H3K14 acetylation co-occur at many gene regulatory elements, while H3K14ac marks a subset of inactive inducible promoters in mouse embryonic stem cells. BMC Genom. 13, 424 (2013).
20. Rada-Iglesias, A. et al. A unique chromatin signature uncovers early developmental enhancers in humans. Nature 470, 279-283 (2011).
21. Xie, W. et al. Histone h3 lysine 56 acetylation is linked to the core transcriptional network in human embryonic stem cells. Mol. Cell 33, 417-427 (2009).
22. Wang, Y. et al. Histone H3 lysine 14 acetylation is required for activation of a DNA damage checkpoint in -ssion yeast. J. Biol. Chem. 287, 4386-4393 (2012).
23. Meshorer, E. et al. Hyperdynamic plasticity of chromatin proteins in pluripotent embryonic stem cells. Dev. Cell 10, 105-116 (2006).
24. Hiratani, I. et al. Genome-wide dynamics of replication timing revealed by in vitro models of mouse embryogenesis. Gen. Res. 20, 155-169 (2010).
25. Steger, D. J. et al. DOT1L/KMT4 recruitment and H3K79 methylation are ubiquitously coupled with gene transcription in mammalian cells. Mol. Cell. Biol. 28, 2825-2839 (2008).
26. Krogan, N. J. et al. Methylation of histone H3 by Set2 in Saccharomyces cerevisiae is linked to transcriptional elongation by RNA polymerase II. Mol. Cell. Biol. 23, 4207-4218 (2003).
27. Zee, B. M. et al. In vivo residue-speci-c histone methylation dynamics. J. Biol. Chem. 285, 3341-3350 (2010).
28. Efroni, S. et al. Global transcription in pluripotent embryonic stem cells. Cell Stem Cell 2, 437-447 (2008).
29. Golipour, A. et al. A late transition in somatic cell reprogramming requires regulators distinct from the pluripotency network. Stem Cell 11, 769-782 (2012).
30. Polo, J. M. et al. A molecular roadmap of reprogramming somatic cells into iPS cells. Cell 151, 1617-1632 (2012).
31. Silva, J. et al. Promotion of reprogramming to ground state pluripotency by signal inhibition. PLoS Biol. 6, e253 (2008).
32. Bannister, A. J. et al. Selective recognition of methylated lysine 9 on histone H3 by the HP1 chromo domain. Nature 410, 120-124 (2001).
33. Lachner, M., O'Carroll, D., Rea, S., Mechtler, K. & Jenuwein, T. Methylation of histone H3 lysine 9 creates a binding site for HP1 proteins. Nature 410, 116-120 (2001).
34. Kwon, S. H. & Workman, J. L. The changing faces of HP1:from heterochromatin formation and gene silencing to euchromatic gene expression. Bioessays 33, 280-289 (2011).
35. Smallwood, A. et al. CBX3 regulates ef-cient RNA processing genome-wide. Genome Res. 22, 1426-1436 (2012).
36. Bilodeau, S., Kagey, M. H., Frampton, G. M., Rahl, P. B. & Young, R. A. SetDB1 contributes to repression of genes encoding developmental regulators and maintenance of ES cell state. Genes Dev. 23, 2484-2489 (2009).
37. Yuan, P. et al. Eset partners with Oct4 to restrict extraembryonic trophoblast lineage potential in embryonic stem cells. Genes Dev. 23, 2507-2520 (2009).
38. Cloos, P. A. C. et al. The putative oncogene GASC1 demethylates tri- and dimethylated lysine 9 on histone H3. Nature 442, 307-311 (2006).
39. Loh, Y. H., Zhang, W., Chen, X., George, J. & Ng, H. H. Jmjd1a and Jmjd2c histone H3 Lys 9 demethylases regulate self-renewal in embryonic stem cells. Genes Dev. 21, 2545-2557 (2007).
40. Ma, D. K., Chiang, C-H. J., Ponnusamy, K., Ming, G-L. & Song, H. G9a and Jhdm2a regulate embryonic stem cell fusion-induced reprogramming of adult neural stem cells. Stem Cell. 26, 2131-2141 (2008).
41. Li, R. et al. A mesenchymal-to-epithelial transition initiates and is required for the nuclear reprogramming of mouse -broblasts. Cell Stem Cell 7, 51-63 (2010).
42. Ichida, J. K. et al. A small-molecule inhibitor of Tgf-; signaling replaces Sox2 in reprogramming by inducing nanog. Cell Stem Cell 5, 491-503 (2009).
43. Silva, J. et al. Nanog is the gateway to the pluripotent ground state. Cell 138, 722-737 (2009).
44. Hanna, J. et al. Direct cell reprogramming is a stochastic process amenable to acceleration. Nature 462, 595-601 (2009).
45. Thomas, M. C. & Chiang, C-M. The general transcription machinery and general cofactors. Crit. Rev. Biochem. Mol. Biol. 41, 105-178 (2006).
46. Grif-ths, D. S. et al. LIF-independent JAK signalling to chromatin in embryonic stem cells uncovered from an adult stem cell disease. Nat. Cell Biol. 13, 13-21 (2010).
47. Stadtfeld, M., Maherali, N., Breault, D. T. & Hochedlinger, K. De-ning molecular cornerstones during -broblast to iPS cell reprogramming in mouse. Cell Stem Cell 2, 230-240 (2008).
48. Yin, H., Sweeney, S., Raha, D., Snyder, M. & Lin, H. A high-resolution whole-genome map of key chromatin modi-cations in the adult Drosophila melanogaster. PLoS Genet. 7, e1002380 (2011).
49. Szabó, P. E., Hübner, K., Schöler, H. & Mann, J. R. Allele-speci-c expression of imprinted genes in mouse migratory primordial germ cells. Mech. Dev. 115, 157-160 (2002).
50. Stadtfeld, M., Maherali, N., Borkent, M. & Hochedlinger, K. A reprogrammable mouse strain from gene-targeted embryonic stem cells. Nature Meth. 7, 53-55 (2009).
51. Beard, C., Hochedlinger, K., Plath, K., Wutz, A. & Jaenisch, R. Ef-cient method to generate single-copy transgenic mice by site-speci-c integration in embryonic stem cells. Genesis 44, 23-28 (2006).
52. Okabe, S., Forsberg-Nilsson, K., Spiro, A. C., Segal, M. & McKay, R. D. Development of neuronal precursor cells and functional postmitotic neurons from embryonic stem cells in vitro. Mech. Dev. 59, 89-102 (1996).
53. Chen, X-F. et al. Mediator and SAGA have distinct roles in pol ii preinitiation complex assembly and function. Cell Rep. 2, 1061-1067 (2012).
54. Lin, J. J. et al. Mediator coordinates PIC assembly with recruitment of CHD1. Genes Dev. 25, 2198-2209 (2011).