Reliability of voxel gray values in cone beam computed tomography for preoperative implant planning assessment

International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants

Volumn 27, Issue 6, 2012, Pages 1438-1442

  Parsa, Azin ^a   Ibrahim, Norliza ^a,b   Hassan, Bassam ^a   Motroni, Alessandro ^c   Van Der Stelt, Paul ^a   Wismeijer, Daniel ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MALAYA   (Malaysia)

^c AMIRG AppliedMedical Imaging Research Group   (Italy)

Author keywords

Accuracy; CBCT; Cone beam computed tomography; Hounsfield unit

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BONE DENSITY; COMPUTER ASSISTED THERAPY; CONE BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; HUMAN; MANDIBLE; METHODOLOGY; MULTIDETECTOR COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; RADIOGRAPHY; REPRODUCIBILITY; STANDARD; STATISTICAL MODEL; TOOTH IMPLANTATION;

BONE DENSITY; CONE-BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; DENTAL IMPLANTATION, ENDOSSEOUS; HUMANS; LINEAR MODELS; MANDIBLE; MULTIDETECTOR COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; REFERENCE STANDARDS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; THERAPY, COMPUTER-ASSISTED;

EID: 84880168039     PISSN: 08822786     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Tolstunov L. Dental implant success-failure analysis: A concept of implant vulnerability. Implant Dent 2006; 15: 341-346.
2. Genant HK, Engelke K, Fuerst T, et al. Noninvasive assessment of bone mineral and structure: State of the art. J Bone Miner Res 1996; 11: 707-730.
3. Jager A, Radlanski RJ, Taufall D, Klein C, Steinhofel N, Doler W. Quantitative determination of alveolar bone density using digital image analysis of microradiographs. Anat Anz 1990; 170: 171-179.
4. Hans D, Fuerst T, Uffmann M. Bone density and quality measurement using ultrasound. Curr Opin Rheumatol 1996; 8: 370-375.
5. Schwarz MS, Rothman SL, Rhodes ML, Chafetz N. Computed tomography: Part I. Preoperative assessment of the mandible for endosseous implant surgery. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1987; 2: 137-141.
6. Schwarz MS, Rothman SL, Rhodes ML, Chafetz N. Computed tomography: Part II. Preoperative assessment of the maxilla for endosseous implant surgery. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1987; 2: 143-148.
7. Shapurian T, Damoulis PD, Reiser GM, Griffin TJ, Rand WM. Quantitative evaluation of bone density using the Hounsfield index. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2006; 21: 290-297.
8. Shahlaie M, Gantes B, Schulz E, Riggs M, Crigger M. Bone density assessments of dental implant sites: 1. Quantitative computed tomography. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2003; 18: 224-231.
9. Ekestubbe A, Thilander A, Gröndahl K, Gröndahl HG. Absorbed doses from computed tomography for dental implant surgery: Comparison with conventional tomography. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1993; 22: 13-17.
10. Ekestubbe A, Thilander A, Gröndahl HG. Absorbed doses and energy imparted from tomography for dental implant installation. Spiral tomography using the Scanora technique compared with hypocycloidal tomography. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1992; 21: 65-69.
11. Frederiksen NL, Benson BW, Sokolowski TW. Effective dose and risk assessment from computed tomography of the maxillofacial complex. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1995; 24: 55-58.
12. Dula K, Mini R, van der Stelt PF, Lambrecht JT, Schneeberger P, Buser D. Hypothetical mortality risk associated with spiral computed tomography of the maxilla and mandible. Eur J Oral Sci 1996; 104: 503-510.
13. Kau CH, Richmond S, Palomo JM, Hans MG. Three-dimensional cone beam computerized tomography in orthodontics. J Orthod 2005; 32: 282-293.
14. Carrafiello G, Dizonno M, Colli V, et al. Comparative study of jaws with multislice computed tomography and cone-beam computed tomography [in English, Italian]. Radiol Med 2010; 115: 600-611.
15. White SC. Cone-beam imaging in dentistry. Health Phys 2008; 95: 628-637.
16. Pauwels R, Beinsberger J, Collaert B, et al. Effective dose range for dental cone beam computed tomography scanners. Eur J Radiol 2012; 81: 267-271.
17. Suomalainen A, Kiljunen T, Käser Y, Peltola J, Kortesniemi M. Dosimetry and image quality of four dental cone beam computed tomography scanners compared with multislice computed tomography scanners. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2009; 38: 367-378.
18. Mah P, Reeves TE, McDavid WD. Deriving Hounsfield units using grey levels in cone beam computed tomography. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2010; 39: 323-335.
19. Hassan B, Nijkamp P, Verheij H, et al. Precision of identifying cephalometric landmarks with cone beam computed tomography in vivo. Eur J Orthod 2011 Mar 29 [epub ahead of print].
20. Naitoh M, Katsumata A, Mitsuya S, Kamemoto H, Ariji E. Measurement of mandibles with microfocus x-ray computerized tomography and compact computerized tomography for dental use. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2004; 19: 239-246.
21. Lagravère MO, Carey J, Toogood RW, Major PW. Three-dimensional accuracy of measurements made with software on cone-beam computed tomography images. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2008; 134: 112-116.
22. Lou L, Lagravere MO, Compton S, Major PW, Flores-Mir C. Accuracy of measurements and reliability of landmark identification with computed tomography (CT) techniques in the maxillofacial area: A systematic review. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2007; 104: 402-411.
23. Song YD, Jun SH, Kwon JJ. Correlation between bone quality evaluated by cone-beam computerized tomography and implant primary stability. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2009; 24: 59-64.
24. Isoda K, Ayukawa Y, Tsukiyama Y, Sogo M, Matsushita Y, Koyano K. Relationship between the bone density estimated by conebeam computed tomography and the primary stability of dental implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 2012; 23: 832-836.
25. Hua Y, Nackaerts O, Duyck J, Maes F, Jacobs R. Bone quality assessment based on cone beam computed tomography imaging. Clin Oral Implants Res 2009; 20: 767-771.
26. Yoo S, Yin FF. Dosimetric feasibility of cone-beam CT-based treatment planning compared to CT-based treatment planning. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2006; 66: 1553-1561.
27. Schulze R, Heil U, Gross D, et al. Artefacts in CBCT: A review. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2011; 40: 265-273.
28. Araki K, Okano T. The effect of surrounding conditions on pixel value of cone beam computed tomography. Clin Oral Implants Res 2011 Nov 17 [epub ahead of print].
29. Nackaerts O, Maes F, Yan H, Couto Souza P, Pauwels R, Jacobs R. Analysis of intensity variability in multislice and cone beam computed tomography. Clin Oral Implants Res 2011; 22: 873-879.
30. Aranyarachkul P, Caruso J, Gantes B, et al. Bone density assessments of dental implant sites: 2. Quantitative cone-beam computerized tomography. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2005; 20: 416-424.
31. Naitoh M, Hirukawa A, Katsumata A, Ariji E. Evaluation of voxel values in mandibular cancellous bone: Relationship between conebeam computed tomography and multislice helical computed tomography. Clin Oral Implants Res 2009; 20: 503-506.
32. Naitoh M, Hirukawa A, Katsumata A, Ariji E. Prospective study to estimate mandibular cancellous bone density using largevolume cone-beam computed tomography. Clin Oral Implants Res 2010; 21: 1309-1313.
33. Nomura Y, Watanabe H, Honda E, Kurabayashi T. Reliability of voxel values from cone-beam computed tomography for dental use in evaluating bone mineral density. Clin Oral Implants Res 2010; 21: 558-562.
34. Lagravère MO, Fang Y, Carey J, Toogood RW, Packota GV, Major PW. Density conversion factor determined using a cone-beam computed tomography unit NewTom QR-DVT 9000. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2006; 35: 407-409.
35. González-García R, Monje F. The reliability of cone-beam computed tomography to assess bone density at dental implant recipient sites: A histomorphometric analysis by micro-CT. Clin Oral Implants Res 2012 Jan 17 [epub ahead of print].
36. Rinkel J, Gerfault L, Estève F, Dinten JM. A new method for x-ray scatter correction: First assessment on a cone-beam CT experimental setup. Phys Med Biol 2007; 52: 4633-4652.
37. Maes F, Collignon A, Vandermeulen D, Marchal G, Suetens P. Multimodality image registration by maximization of mutual information. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 1997; 16: 187-198.
38. Zhang Z. Iterative point matching for registration of free-form curves and surfaces. Int J Comput Vis 1994; 13: 119-152.
39. Lekholm U, Zarb GA. Patient selection and preparation. In: Brånemark P-I, Zarb GA, Albrektsson T (eds). Tissue-integrated prostheses: Osseointegration in Clinical Dentistry. Chicago: Quintessence; 1985: 199-209.
40. Katsumata A, Hirukawa A, Okumura S, et al. Relationship between density variability and imaging volume size in cone-beam computerized tomographic scanning of the maxillofacial region: An in vitro study. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2009; 107: 420-425.