Multislice CT for assessing in-stent dimensions after left main coronary artery stenting: A comparison with three dimensional intravascular ultrasound

Heart

Volumn 99, Issue 15, 2013, Pages 1106-1112

  Roura, Gerard ^a   Gomez Lara, Josep ^a   Ferreiro, José L ^a   Gomez Hospital, Joan A ^a   Romaguera, Rafael ^a   Teruel, Luís M ^a   Carreño, Elena ^a   Esplugas, Enric ^a   Alfonso, Fernando ^b   Cequier, Angel ^a  

^a HOSPITAL UNIVERSITARI DE BELLVITGE   (Spain)

^b HOSPITAL CLÍNICO SAN CARLOS   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTERY DIAMETER; ARTICLE; CHRONIC KIDNEY FAILURE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORONARY STENT; DIAGNOSTIC TEST ACCURACY STUDY; DRUG ELUTING STENT; FALSE NEGATIVE RESULT; HEART ATRIUM FIBRILLATION; HUMAN; IN-STENT RESTENOSIS; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; INTRAVASCULAR ULTRASOUND; LEFT CORONARY ARTERY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MULTIDETECTOR COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; NON ST SEGMENT ELEVATION MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION; OBSERVATIONAL STUDY; PREDICTION; PREDICTIVE VALUE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; RESTENOSIS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; ST SEGMENT ELEVATION MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION; STABLE ANGINA PECTORIS; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; X RAY ANALYSIS;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ANGIOPLASTY, BALLOON, CORONARY; COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS RESEARCH; CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; CORONARY RESTENOSIS; CORONARY VESSELS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MULTIDETECTOR COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; ROC CURVE; SPAIN; STENTS; ULTRASONOGRAPHY, INTERVENTIONAL;

EID: 84880135973     PISSN: 13556037     EISSN: 1468201X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/heartjnl-2013-303679     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Stein PD, Beemath A, Kayali F, et al. Multidetector computed tomography for the diagnosis of coronary artery disease: a systematic review. Am J Med 2006;119:203-16. (Pubitemid 43255058)
2. Schuijf JD, Pundziute G, Jukema JW, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice multislice computed tomography in the noninvasive evaluation of significant coronary artery disease. Am J Cardiol 2006;98:145-8. (Pubitemid 43975510)
3. Deetjen A, Möllmann S, Conradi G, et al. Use of automatic exposure control in multislice computed tomography of the coronaries: comparison of 16-slice and 64-slice scanner data with conventional coronary angiography. Heart 2007;93:1040-3. (Pubitemid 47310978)
4. Werkhoven JM, Gaemperli O, Schuijf JD, et al. Cardiac imaging and non-invasive testing: multislice computed tomography coronary angiography for risk stratification in patients with an intermediate pretest likelihood. Heart 2009;95:1607-11.
5. Lawler LP, Pannu HK, Fishman EK. MDCT evaluation of the coronary arteries, 2004: how we do it-data acquisition, postprocessing, display, and interpretation. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2005;184:1402-12. (Pubitemid 43821807)
6. Gaspar T, Halon DA, Lewis BS, et al. Diagnosis of coronary in-stent restenosis with multidetector row spiral computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005;46:1573-9. (Pubitemid 41446198)
7. Carrabba N, Bamoshmoosh M, Carusi LM, et al. Usefulness of 64-slice multidetector computed tomography for detecting drug eluting in-stent restenosis. Am J Cardiol 2007;100:1754-8. (Pubitemid 350234794)
8. Hecht HS, Zaric M, Jelnin V, et al. Usefulness of 64-detector computed tomographic angiography for diagnosing in-stent restenosis in native coronary arteries. Am J Cardiol 2008;101:820-4.
9. Ehara M, Kawai M, Surmely JF, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of coronary in-stent restenosis using 64-slice computed tomography: comparison with invasive coronary angiography. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007;49:951-9.
10. Chaitman BR, Fisher LD, Bourassa MG, et al. Effect of coronary bypass surgery on survival patterns in subsets of patients with left main coronary artery disease. Report of the Collaborative Study in Coronary Artery Surgery (CASS). Am J Cardiol 1981;48:765-77. (Pubitemid 12002816)
11. Caracciolo EA, Davis KB, Sopko G, et al. Comparison of surgical and medical group survival in patients with left main coronary artery disease. Long-term CASS experience. Circulation 1995;91:2325-34.
12. Morice MC, Serruys PW, Kappetein AP, et al. Outcomes in patients with de novo left main disease treated with either percutaneous coronary intervention using paclitaxel-eluting stents or coronary artery bypass graft treatment in the Synergy between Percutaneous Coronary Intervention with TAXUS and Cardiac Surgery (SYNTAX) trial. Circulation 2010;121:2645-53.
13. Wijns W, Kolh P, Danchin N, et al. Guidelines on myocardial revascularization. Eur Heart J 2010;31:2501-55.
14. Morice MC, Feldman TE, Mack MJ, et al. Angiographic outcomes following stenting or coronary artery bypass surgery of the left main coronary artery: fifteen-month outcomes from the synergy between PCI with TAXUS express and cardiac surgery left main angiographic substudy (SYNTAX-LE MANS). EuroIntervention 2011;7:670-9.
15. de Feyter PJ, Kay P, Disco C, et al. Reference chart derived from post-stent-implantation intravascular ultrasound predictors of 6-month expected restenosis on quantitative coronary angiography. Circulation 1999;100:1777-83. (Pubitemid 29498383)
16. Van Mieghem CA, Cademartiri F, Mollet NR, et al. Multislice spiral computed tomography for the evaluation of stent patency after left main coronary artery stenting: a comparison with conventional coronary angiography and intravascular ultrasound. Circulation 2006;114:645-53. (Pubitemid 44252306)
17. Gilard M, Cornily JC, Rioufol G, et al. Noninvasive assessment of left main coronary stent patency with 16-slice computed tomography. Am J Cardiol 2005;95:110-12. (Pubitemid 40051123)
18. Mayo JR, Leipsic JA. Radiation dose in cardiac CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2009;192:646-53.
19. Halon DA, Gaspar T, Adawi S, et al. Coronary stent assessment on multidetector computed tomography: Source and predictors of image distortion. Int J Cardiol 2008;128:62-8. (Pubitemid 351905760)
20. Koning G, Dijkstra J, von Birgelen C, et al. Advanced contour detection for three-dimensional intracoronary ultrasound: a validation-in vitro and in vivo. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 2002;18:235-48. (Pubitemid 34661769)
21. Atiqi R, van Iersel C, Cleophas TJ. Accuracy assessments of quantitative diagnostic tests for clinical research. Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther 2009;47:153-8.
22. Fleiss J. The design and analysis of clinical experiments. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1986.
23. de la Torre Hernandez JM, Hernandez F Hernandez, Alfonso F, et al. Prospective application of pre-defined intravascular ultrasound criteria for assessment of intermediate left main coronary artery lesions results from the multicenter LITRO study. J Am Coll Cardiol 58:351-8.
24. Taylor AJ, Cerqueira M, Hodgson JM, et al. ACCF/SCCT/ACR/AHA/ASE/ASNC/ NASCI/ SCAI/SCMR 2010 appropriate use criteria for cardiac computed tomography. A report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Appropriate Use Criteria Task Force, the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography, the American College of Radiology, the American Heart Association, the American Society of Echocardiography, the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, the North American Society for Cardiovascular Imaging, the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance. J Am Coll Cardiol 2010;56:1864-94.
25. Jasti V, Ivan E, Yalamanchili V, et al. Correlations between fractional flow reserve and intravascular ultrasound in patients with an ambiguous left main coronary artery stenosis. Circulation 2004;110:2831-6. (Pubitemid 39473605)