Caseload midwifery in a multi-ethnic community: The women's experiences

Midwifery

Volumn 29, Issue 8, 2013, Pages 996-1002

  Beake, Sarah ^a   Acosta, Luisa ^b   Cooke, Pauline ^c   McCourt, Christine ^d  

^a KING'S COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WEST LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^c ST MARY S HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^d CITY UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Caseload midwifery; Continuity; Ethnicity; Maternity

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BIRTH; CASELOAD MIDWIFERY; CONTINUITY EFFECT; ETHNICITY; ETHNOLOGY; FEMALE; HEALTH SERVICE; HUMAN; MATERNITY; METHODOLOGY; MIDWIFE; NURSE PATIENT RELATIONSHIP; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PREGNANCY; QUESTIONNAIRE; UNITED KINGDOM; YOUNG ADULT;

CASELOAD MIDWIFERY; CONTINUITY; ETHNICITY; MATERNITY;

ADULT; ENGLAND; FEMALE; HUMANS; MATERNAL HEALTH SERVICES; MIDWIFERY; NURSE-PATIENT RELATIONS; PARTURITION; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PREGNANCY; QUESTIONNAIRES; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84880036040     PISSN: 02666138     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.midw.2013.01.003     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Barnard H., Turner C. Poverty and Ethnicity. A Review of the Evidence 2011, Joseph Rowntree Foundation, York.
2. Beake S., McCourt C., Page L. Report on the Evaluation of One-to-One Midwifery: Second Cohort Study 2001, Thames Valley University, London.
3. Beck C.T. Pentadic cartography: mapping birth trauma narratives. Qualitative Health Research 2006, 16:453-466.
4. Benjamin Y., Walsh D., Taub N. A comparison of partnership caseload midwifery care with conventional team midwifery care; labour and birth outcomes. Midwifery 2001, 17:234-240.
5. Care Quality Commission, 2011. Investigation Report. Barking, Havering and Redbridge University Hospitals NHS Trust, Queen's Hospital, King George's Hospital. October 2011. http://www.cqc.org.uk/sites/default/files/media/documents/20111026_bhrut_investigation_report_final.pdf.
6. CMACE Saving mothers' lives. Reviewing maternal deaths to make motherhood safer: 2006-2008. The eighth report of the confidential enquiries into maternal deaths in the United Kingdom. Centre for Maternal and Child Enquiries. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 2011, 118:1-203.
7. Coulter A., Ellis J. Patient-Focused Interventions: A Review of the Evidence 2006, Picker Institute/Health Foundation, London.
8. De Souza L., Garcia J. Improving services for disadvantaged childbearing women. Child: Care, Health and Development 2004, 30:599-611.
9. Department of Health Changing Childbirth. Part 1: The Report of the Expert Maternity Group 1993, HMSO, London.
10. Department of Health National Service Framework for Children, Young People and Maternity Services 2004, HMSO, London.
11. Department of Health Maternity Matters: Choice Access and Continuity of Care in a Safe Service 2007, HMSO, London.
12. Dykes F., Moran V.H., Burt S., Edwards J. Adolescent mothers and breastfeeding: experiences and support needs-an exploratory study. Journal of Human Lactation 2003, 19:391-401.
13. Entwistle V.A., McCaughan D., Watt I.S., for the PIPS (Patient Involvement in Patient Safety) group, et al. Speaking up about safety concerns: multi-setting qualitative study of patients' views and experiences. Quality and Safety in Health Care 2010, 19:e33.
14. Finlay S., Sandall J. "Someone's rooting for you": Continuity and Advocacy in Bureaucratic Maternal Health Care Systems. Social Science and Medicine 2009, 69:1228-1235. 10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.07.029.
15. Green J.M., Coupland V.A., Kitzinger J.V. Expectations, experiences, and psychological outcomes of childbirth: a prospective study of 825 women. Birth 1990, 17:15-24.
16. Haggerty J.L., Reid R.J., Freeman G.K., Starfield B.H., Adair C.E., McKendry R. Continuity of care: a multidisciplinary review. British Medical Journal 2003, 327:1219-1221.
17. Harper-Bulman K., McCourt C. Somali refugee women's views and experiences of maternity care in West London. Critical Public Health 2002, 12:365-380.
18. Hatem, M., Sandall, J., Devane, D., Soltani, H., Gates, S., 2008. Midwife-led versus other models of care for childbearing women. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, .pub2. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD004667.
19. Health Care Commission Investigation into 10 Maternal Deaths at, or Following Delivery at, Northwick Park Hospital, North West London Hospitals NHS Trust, between April 2002 and April 2005 2005, Healthcare Commission, London.
20. Healthcare Commission Towards Better Births: A Review of Maternity Services in England 2008, Healthcare Commission, London.
21. Homer C.S., Davis G.K., Brodie P.M., et al. Collaboration in maternity care: a randomized controlled trial comparing community-based continuity of care with standard hospital care. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 2001, 108:16-22.
22. Homer C.S., Davis G.K., Cooke M., Barclay L.M. Women's experiences of continuity of midwifery care in a randomised controlled trial in Australia. Midwifery 2002, 18:102-112.
23. Hunter B. The importance of reciprocity in relationships between community-based midwives and mothers. Midwifery 2006, 22:308-322.
24. Kurinczuk, J.J, Hollowell, J., Brocklehurst, P., Gray, G., 2009. Inequalities in infant mortality project briefing paper 1. Infant mortality: overview and context. In. Oxford: National Perinatal Epidemiology Unit. https://www.npeu.ox.ac.uk/files/downloads/infant-mortality/Infant-Mortality-Briefing-Paper-1.pdf.
25. Lewis G. Confidential Enquiry into Maternal and Child Health. Why Mothers Die. The Sixth Report of the United Kingdom Enquiries into maternal deaths 2000-2002 2004, RCOG, London.
26. Lewis G. The Confidential Enquiry into Maternal and Child Health (CEMACH). Saving mothers' lives: the seventh report on confidential enquiries into maternal deaths in the United Kingdom 2007, RCOG, London.
27. Lyndon A., Sexton J.B., Simpson K.R., Rosenstein A., Lee K.A., Wachter R.M. Predictors of likelihood of speaking up about safety concerns in labour and delivery. BMJ Quality and Safety 2011, 10.1136/bmjqs.2010.050211.
28. Mackintosh N., Sandall J. Overcoming gendered and professional hierarchies in order to facilitate escalation of care in emergency situations: the role of standardized communication protocols. Social Science & Medicine 2010, 71:1683-1686.
29. McAree T., McCourt C., Beake S. Perceptions of group practice midwifery from women living in an ethnically diverse setting. Evidence Based Midwifery 2010, 8:91-97.
30. McCourt C., Page L., Hewison J., Vail A. Evaluation of one-to-one midwifery: women's responses to care. Birth 1998, 25:73-80.
31. McCourt C., Pearce A. Does continuity of carer matter to women from minority ethnic groups?. Midwifery 2000, 16:145-154.
32. McCourt C. Supporting choice and control? Communication and interaction between midwives and women at the antenatal booking visit. Social Science & Medicine 2006, 62:1307-1318.
33. McCourt C., Stevens T., Sandall J., Brodie P. Working with women: continuity of carer in practice. The New Midwifery: Science and Sensitivity in Practice 2006, Churchill Livingstone, Oxford. 2nd edn. L. Page, R. McCandlish (Eds.).
34. McCourt C., Stevens T. Relationship and reciprocity in caseload midwifery. Emotions in Midwifery and Reproduction 2009, 17-23. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke. B. Hunter, R. Deery (Eds.).
35. McCourt C. Social support and childbirth. The Social Context of Birth 2009, 187-210. Radcliffe Medical Press, Oxford. 2nd edn. C. Squire (Ed.).
36. McCourt, C., Rance, S., Rayment, J., Sandall, J., 2011. Birthplace Qualitative Organisational Case Studies: How Maternity Care Systems may Affect the Provision of Care in Different Birth Settings Birthplace in England Research Programme. Final Report Part 6. NIHR Service Delivery and Organisation Programme.
37. McLeish J. Maternity experiences of asylum seekers in England. British Journal of Midwifery 2005, 13:782-785.
38. National Perinatal Epidemiology Unit Recorded Delivery: A National Survey of Women's Experience of Maternity Care 2006 2007, NPEU, Oxford.
39. North Staffordshire Changing Childbirth Research Team A randomised study of midwifery caseload care and traditional 'shared-care'. Midwifery 2000, 16:295-302.
40. Nutting P., Goodwin M.A., Flocke S.A., Zyzanski S.J., Stange K.C. Continuity of primary care: to whom does it matter and when?. Annals of Family Medicine 2003, 1:149-155.
41. Page L., Beake S., Vail A., McCourt C., Hewison J. Clinical outcomes of one-to-one midwifery practice. British Journal of Midwifery 2001, 9:700-706.
42. Pilnick A., Dingwall R. On the remarkable persistence of asymmetry in doctor/patient interaction: a critical review. Social Science & Medicine 2011, 72:1374-1382.
43. Pope C., Ziebland S., Mays N. Qualitative research in health care. Analysing qualitative data. British Medical Journal 2009, 329:114-116.
44. Raleigh V., Hussey D., Seccombe I., Halt K. Ethnic and social inequalities in women's experience of maternity care in England: results of a national survey. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine 2010, 103:188-198.
45. Redshaw M., Rowe R., Hockley C., Brocklehurst P. Recorded Delivery: A National Survey of Women's Experience of Maternity Care 2006, NPEU, Oxford.
46. Redshaw M., Heikkila K. Delivered with Care: A National Survey of Women's Experience of Maternity Care. National Perinatal Epidemiology Unit 2010, University of Oxford, Oxford.
47. Ritchie J., Spencer L., O'Connor W. Carrying out qualitative analysis. Qualitative Research Practice: A Guide for Social Science Students and Researchers 2003, Sage Publications, London. J. Ritchie, J. Lewis (Eds.).
48. Rowe R.E., Garcia J., Macfarlane A.J., Davidson L.L. Does poor communication contribute to stillbirths and infant deaths? A review. Journal of Public Health Medicine 2001, 23:23-34.
49. Sandall, J., Davies, J., Warwick, C., 2001. Evaluation of the Albany Midwifery Practice. Final Report. Florence Nightingale School of Nursing and Midwifery King's College, London.
50. Strauss A., Corbin J. Basics of Qualitative Research. Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques 1990, Sage, London.
51. Tanassi L.M. Compliance as strategy: the importance of personalised relations in obstetric practice. Social Science & Medicine 2004, 59:2053-2069.
52. The King's Fund Safe Births: Everybody's Business: An Independent Inquiry into the Safety of Maternity Services in England 2008, The King's Fund, London.
53. Williams K., Lago L., Lainchbury A., Eagar K. Mothers' views of caseload midwifery and the value of continuity of care at an Australian regional hospital. Midwifery 2010, 26:615-621.