A Method for the Evaluation of Metropolitan Planning: Application to the Context in Spain

European Planning Studies

Volumn 21, Issue 6, 2013, Pages 944-966

  Soria, Julio Alberto ^a   Valenzuela, Luis Miguel ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GRANADA   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

METROPOLITAN AREA; PLANNING METHOD; PLANNING PROCESS; URBAN DEVELOPMENT; URBAN PLANNING; URBANIZATION;

ANDALUCIA; GRANADA [ANDALUCIA]; GRANADA [GRANADA (PRV)]; SPAIN;

EID: 84880010211     PISSN: 09654313     EISSN: 14695944     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09654313.2012.722935     Document Type: Article

References (61)

1. Aguilera, F. (2008) Análisis espacial para la ordenación eco-paisajística de la aglomeración urbana de Granada. Tesis Doctoral. Dpto. Expresión Gráfica Arquitectónica y en la Ingeniería. Área de Urbanística y Ordenación del Territorio. Universidad de Granada.
2. Aguilera, F., Valenzuela, L. M. and Botequilha-Leitao, A. 2011. Landscape metrics in the analysis of urban lands use patterns: A case study in Spanish metropolitan area. Landscape and Urban Planning, 99 (3-4): 226 - 238. (doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2010.10.004)
3. Alexander, E. R. 1998. Doing the impossible: Notes for a general theory of planning. Environment and Planning B: Planning & Design, 25 (5): 667 - 680. (doi:10.1068/b250667)
4. Alexander, E. R. 2000. Rationality revisited: Planning paradigms in a post-postmodernist perspective. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 19 (3): 242 - 256. (doi:10.1177/0739456X0001900303)
5. Alexander, E. R. 2006. " Evolution and status. Where is planning evaluation today and how did it get here? ". In Evaluation in Planning: Evolution and Prospects, Edited by: Alexander, E. R. 3 - 16. Aldershot: Ashgate.
6. Alexander, E. R. 2009. Dilemmas in evaluating planning, or back to basics: What is planning for?. Planning, Theory & Practice, 10 (2): 233 - 244. (doi:10.1080/14649350902884177)
7. Alexander, E. R. and Faludi, A. 1989. Planning and plan implementation: Notes on evaluation criteria. Environment and Planning B: Planning & Design, 16 (1): 127 - 140. (doi:10.1068/b160127)
8. Baer, W. 1997. General plan evaluation criteria. Journal of the American Planning Association, 63 (3): 329 - 344. (doi:10.1080/01944369708975926)
9. Benavent, M. (2006) La ordenación del territorio en España. Evolución del concepto y de su práctica en el siglo XX (Sevilla, Junta de Andalucía).
10. Berke, P. and Godshalk, D. 2009. Searching for the good plan. A meta-analysis of plan quality studies. Journal of Planning Literature, 23 (3): 227 - 240. (doi:10.1177/0885412208327014)
11. Berke, P., Backhurst, M., Day, M., Ericksen, N., Laurian, L., Crawford, J. and Dixon, J. 2006. What makes plan implementation successful? An evaluation of local plans and implementation practices in New Zealand. Environment and Planning B: Planning & Design, 33 (4): 581 - 600. (doi:10.1068/b31166)
12. Brody, S. and Highfield, W. 2005. Does planning work? Testing the implementation of local environmental planning in Florida. Journal of the American Planning Association, 71 (2): 159 - 175. (doi:10.1080/01944360508976690)
13. Brody, S., Carrasco, V. and Highfield, W. 2006. Measuring the adoption of local sprawl reduction planning policies in Florida. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 25 (3): 294 - 310. (doi:10.1177/0739456X05280546)
14. Carmona, M. and Sieh, L. 2005. Performance measurement innovation in English planning authorities. Planning Theory & Practice, 6 (3): 303 - 333. (doi:10.1080/14649350500208944)
15. Carreras, J. M., Otero, M. and Ruiz, E. 2009. Aglomeracions Metropolitanes Europees. Revista Papers, 50 (1): 246 - 264. (Eds)
16. Castell, M. 1995. La ciudad informacional, Madrid: Alianza Editorial.
17. Chapin, T. S., Doyle, R. and Baker, J. 2008. A parcel-based GIS method for evaluating conformance of local land-use planning with a state mandate to reduce exposure to hurricane flooding. Environment and Planning B: Planning & Design, 35 (2): 261 - 279. (doi:10.1068/b32114)
18. COPT (Consejería de Obras Públicas y Transportes) (1999) Plan de Ordenación del Territorio de la Aglomeración Urbana de Granada (Última revisión del plan en 2005), Granada, España.
19. Couclelis, H. 2009. Rethinking time geography in the information age. Environment and Planning A, 41 (7): 1556 - 1575. (doi:10.1068/a4151)
20. European Environment Agency (2006a) Urban Sprawl in Europe, EEA Report N°10/2006, Brussels.
21. European Environment Agency (2006b) Land Accounts for Europe. Towards integrated land and ecosystem accounting, EEA Report N°11/2006, Brussels.
22. Ezquiaga, J. M. 1997. ¿Cambio de estilo o cambio de paradigma? Una reflexión sobre la crisis del planeamiento urbanístico. Revista URBAN, 2 (1): 10 - 23.
23. Faludi, A. 2000. The performance of spatial planning. Planning Practice & Research, 15 (4): 299 - 318. (doi:10.1080/713691907)
24. Faludi, A. 2006. " Evaluating plans: The application of the European spatial development perspective ". In Evaluation in planning: Evolution and Prospects, Edited by: Alexander, E. R. 119 - 143. Aldershot: Ashgate.
25. Farinós, J. and Romero, J. 2007. Territorialidad y buen gobierno para el desarrollo sostenible: Nuevos principios y nuevas políticas en el espacio europeo, Edited by: Farinós, J. and Romero, J. Valencia: Universidad de Valencia.
26. Feria, J. M. 2010. La delimitación y organización espacial de las áreas metropolitanas españolas: una perspectiva desde la movilidad residencia-trabajo. Ciudad y Territorio. Estudios Territoriales, 164 (1): 189 - 210.
27. Ferrer, A. 2005. Introducción: La última deriva del urbanismo municipal. Entrevista a 20 urbanistas. Revista Papers, 43 (1): 11 - 13.
28. Font, A. 2003. Planeamiento urbanístico. De la controversia a la renovación, Edited by: Font, A. Barcelona: Diputació Barcelona.
29. González, J. M. 2007. Urban planning system in contemporary Spain. European Planning Studies, 15 (1): 29 - 50. (doi:10.1080/09654310601016481)
30. Guba, E. G. and Lincoln, Y. S. 1989. Fourth Generation Evaluation, Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
31. Gupta, J., Termeer, K., Klostermann, J., Meijerink, S., van den Brink, M., Jong, P. & Nooteboom, S. (2008) Institutions for Climate Change. A Method to Assess the Inherent Characteristics of Institutions to Enable the Adaptive Capacity of Society. Institute for Environmental Studies (IVM) Report W-08/21, Amsterdam, NL.
32. Indovina, F. 1991. La citta diffusa, Edited by: Indovina, F. Venezia: DAEST.
33. Indovina, F. 2005. L'esplosione della cittá, (Bologna Fondazione Casa di Risparmio in Editrice.
34. Jonas, O. 2001. Territoires numériques: interrrelations entre les technologies de l'information et le communication et l'espace, les territoires, les temporalités, Paris: Direction Générale de l'Urbanisme de l'Habitat et de la Construction.
35. Kasanko, M., Barredo, J. I., Lavalle, C., Mccormick, N., Demicheli, L., Sagris, V. and Brezger, A. 2005. Are European Cities becoming dispersed? A comparative analysis of 15 European urban areas. Landscape and Urban Planning, 77 (1-2): 111 - 130. (doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2005.02.003)
36. Keiner, M. and Arley, K. 2007. Transnational city networks for sustainability. European Planning Studies, 15 (10): 1368 - 1395. (doi:10.1080/09654310701550843)
37. Khakee, A. 1998. Evaluation and planning: Inseparable concepts. Town Planning Review, 69 (4): 359 - 374.
38. Khakee, A. 2003. The emerging gap between evaluation research and practice. Evaluation, 9 (3): 340 - 352. (doi:10.1177/13563890030093007)
39. Lange, M., Mastop, H. and Spit, T. 1997. Performance of national policies. Environment and Planning B: Planning & Design, 24 (6): 845 - 858. (doi:10.1068/b240845)
40. Laurian, L., Day, M., Backhurst, M., Berke, P., Ericksen, N., Crawford, J., Dixon, J. and Chapman, S. 2004a. What drives plan implementation? Plans, planning agencies and developers. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 47 (4): 555 - 577. (doi:10.1080/0964056042000243230)
41. Laurian, L., Day, M., Berke, P., Ericksen, N., Backhurst, M., Crawford, J. and Dixon, J. 2004b. Evaluating plan implementation: A conformance-based methodology. Journal of the American Planning Association, 70 (4): 471 - 480. (doi:10.1080/01944360408976395)
42. Laurian, L., Crawford, J., Maxine, D., Kouwenhoven, P., Mason, G., Ericksen, N. and Beattiem, L. 2010. Evaluating the outcomes of plans: Theory, practice and methodology. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 37 (4): 740 - 757. (doi:10.1068/b35051)
43. Lichfield, N. 1998. " Trends in planning evaluation: A British perspective ". In Evaluation in Planning: Facing the Challenge of Complexity, Edited by: Lichfield, N., Barbanente, A., Borri, N., Khakee, A. and Prat, A. 1 - 15. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
44. Lichfield, N. 2001. " The philosophy and role of community impact evaluation in the planning system ". In Recent Developments in Evaluation, Edited by: Voogd, H. 153 - 173. Groningen: Geopress.
45. Mastop, H. and Faludi, A. 1997. Evaluation of strategic plans: The performance principle. Environment and Planning B: Planning & Design, 24 (6): 815 - 832. (doi:10.1068/b240815)
46. Mastop, H. and Needham, B. 1997. Performance studies in spatial planning: The state of the art. Environment and Planning B: Planning & Design, 24 (6): 881 - 888. (doi:10.1068/b240881)
47. Miller, D. and Patassini, D. 2005. Beyond Cost-Benefit Analysis: Accounting for Non-Market Values in Planning Evaluation, Edited by: Miller, D. and Patassini, D. Aldershot: Ashgate.
48. Ministerio de Vivienda (2006) Atlas estadístico de las áreas urbanas en España (2004), Informe de la Dirección General de Urbanismo y Política del Suelo n°1/2006. Madrid, España.
49. Morrison, N. and Pearce, B. 2000. Developing indicators for evaluating the effectiveness of the UK land use planning system. Town Planning Review, 71 (2): 191 - 211.
50. Muñoz, D. and Tasan, T. 2010. Flexibility in planning and the consequences for public-value capturing in UK, Spain and the Netherlands. European Planning Studies, 18 (7): 1097 - 1130. (doi:10.1080/09654311003744191)
51. Oliveira, V. and Pinho, P. 2009. Evaluating plans, process and results. Planning Theory and Practice, 10 (1): 35 - 63. (doi:10.1080/14649350802661741)
52. Oliveira, V. and Pinho, P. 2010. Evaluation in urban planning: Advances and prospects. Journal of Planning Literature, 24(4), pp. 343-361
53. Seasons, M. L. 2003. Monitoring and evaluation in municipal planning. Journal of the American Planning Association, 69 (4): 430 - 440. (doi:10.1080/01944360308976329)
54. Soria, J. A., Valenzuela, L. M. and Aguilera, F. 2010. Sondaggio sull' incidenza degli osservatori territoriali ed urbani nella pianificazione europea. Archivio di studi urbani e regionali, 96 (1): 133 - 157.
55. Talen, E. 1996a. After the plans: Methods to evaluate the implementation success of plans. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 16 (1): 79 - 91. (doi:10.1177/0739456X9601600201)
56. Talen, E. 1996b. Do plans get implemented? A review of evaluation in planning. Journal of Planning Literature, 10 (3): 248 - 259. (doi:10.1177/088541229601000302)
57. Talen, E. 1997. Success, failure and conformance: An alternative approach to planning evaluation. Environment and Planning B: Planning & Design, 24 (4): 573 - 587. (doi:10.1068/b240573)
58. Valenzuela, L. M., Soria, J. A. & Aguilera, F. (2007) Dinámicas y procesos en el área metropolitana de Granada V Congreso Internacional de Ordenación del Territorio (CIOT). FUNDICOT. Málaga (España).
59. Veltz, P. 1999. Mundialización, ciudades y territorios: la economía de archipiélago, Barcelona: Ariel.
60. Williams, G. 1999. Institutional capacity and metropolitan governance: The Greater Toronto Area. Cities, 16 (3): 171 - 180. (doi:10.1016/S0264-2751(99)00014-1)
61. Zabala, J., Jiménez, F. and Castro, E. 2008. Evaluating European regional innovation strategies. European Plannig Studies, 16 (8): 1145 - 1160. (doi:10.1080/09654310802315849)