Incidence of surgical-site infection is not affected by method of immediate breast reconstruction

Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery

Volumn 132, Issue 1, 2013, Pages

  Costa, Melinda A ^a   Rommer, Elizabeth ^a   Peric, Mirna ^a   Nguyen, T JoAnna ^a   Shahabi, Ahva ^a   Davis, Gabrielle B ^a   Vidar, Evan N ^a   Chan, Linda S ^a   Wong, Alex K ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BREAST IMPLANT; BREAST RECONSTRUCTION; BREAST TUMOR; COMPARATIVE STUDY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; INCIDENCE; MASTECTOMY; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK FACTOR; SURGICAL INFECTION; TIME; UNITED STATES;

BREAST IMPLANTS; BREAST NEOPLASMS; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; INCIDENCE; MAMMAPLASTY; MASTECTOMY; MIDDLE AGED; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK FACTORS; SURGICAL WOUND INFECTION; TIME FACTORS; UNITED STATES;

EID: 84879979796     PISSN: 00321052     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e318290f87e     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program (www.seer.cancer.gov) research data (1973-2009), National Cancer Institute, DCCPS, Surveillance Research Program, Surveillance Systems Branch, released April 2012, based on the November 2011 submission. 2010. Available at: http://www.plasticsurgery.org/news-and-resources/2010- statistics.html. Accessed June 3, 2012.
2. American Society of Plastics Surgeons. 2011 Reconstructive plastic surgery statistics: Reconstructive procedure trends. Available at: http://www.plasticsurgery.org/Documents/news-resources/statistics/ 2011-statistics/2011-reconstructive- procedures-trends-statistics.pdf. Accessed May 22, 2012.
3. Malata CM, McIntosh SA, Purushotham AD. Immediate breast reconstruction after mastectomy for cancer. Br J Surg. 2000;87:1455-1472.
4. Plogmeier K, Handstein S, Schneider W. Breast reconstruction: Autologous tissue versus implant (in German). Zentralbl Chir. 1998;123(Suppl 5):110-112.
5. Warren Peled A, Foster RD, Stover AC, et al. Outcomes after total skin-sparing mastectomy and immediate reconstruction in 657 breasts. Ann Surg Oncol. 2012;19:3402-3409.
6. Horan TC, Andrus M, Dudeck MA. CDC/NHSN surveillance definition of health care-associated infection and criteria for specific types of infections in the acute care setting. Am J Infect Control 2008;36:309-332.
7. Reichman DE, Greenberg JA. Reducing surgical site infections: A review. Rev Obstet Gynecol. 2009;2:212-221.
8. Olsen MA, Chu-Ongsakul S, Brandt KE, Dietz JR, Mayfield J, Fraser VJ. Hospital-associated costs due to surgical site infection after breast surgery. Arch Surg. 2008;143:53-60; discussion 61.
9. Nguyen TJ, Costa MA, Vidar EN, et al. Effect of immediate reconstruction on postmastectomy surgical site infection. Ann Surg. 2012;256:326-333.
10. Leong G, Wilson J, Charlett A. Duration of operation as a risk factor for surgical site infection: Comparison of English and US data. J Hosp Infect. 2006;63:255-262.
11. Vinh DC, Embil JM. Device-related infections: A review. J Long Term Eff Med Implants 2005;15:467-488.
12. Costerton JW, Montanaro L, Arciola CR. Biofilm in implant infections: Its production and regulation. Int J Artif Organs 2005;28:1062-1068.
13. Washer LL, Gutowski K. Breast implant infections. Infect Dis Clin North Am. 2012;26:111-125.
14. Gusenoff JA, Vega SJ, Jiang S, et al. Free tissue transfer: Comparison of outcomes between university hospitals and community hospitals. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006;118: 671-675.
15. Francis SH, Ruberg RL, Stevenson KB, et al. Independent risk factors for infection in tissue expander breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009;124:1790-1796.
16. Nahabedian MY, Tsangaris T, Momen B, Manson PN. Infectious complications following breast reconstruction with expanders and implants. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2003;112: 467-476.
17. Alderman AK, Wilkins EG, Kim HM, Lowery JC. Complications in postmastectomy breast reconstruction: Two-year results of the Michigan Breast Reconstruction Outcome Study. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2002;109:2265-2274.
18. Pinsolle V, Grinfeder C, Mathoulin-Pelissier S, Faucher A. Complications analysis of 266 immediate breast reconstructions. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2006;59:1017-1024.
19. Ingraham AM, Richards KE, Hall BL, Ko CY. Quality improvement in surgery: The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program approach. Adv Surg. 2010;44:251-267.
20. Wolters U, Wolf T, Stützer H, Schröder T. ASA classification and perioperative variables as predictors of postoperative outcome. Br J Anaesth. 1996;77:217-222.
21. Surgical case reviewer's variables and definitions. In: American College of Surgeons' National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. 2008:4-1-4-33.
22. Giacalone PL, Rathat G, Daures JP, Benos P, Azria D, Rouleau C. New concept for immediate breast reconstruction for invasive cancers: Feasibility, oncological safety and esthetic outcome of post-neoadjuvant therapy immediate breast reconstruction versus delayed breast reconstruction. A prospective pilot study. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2010;122:439-451.
23. Prince MD, Suber JS, Aya-Ay ML, et al. Prosthesis salvage in breast reconstruction patients with periprosthetic infection and exposure. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012;129:42-48.
24. Mangram AJ, Horan TC, Pearson ML, Silver LC, Jarvis WR. Guideline for prevention of surgical site infection, 1999. Hospital Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 1999;20:250-278; quiz 279.