Gamification of ERP systems - Exploring gamification effects on user acceptance constructs

Multikonferenz Wirtschaftsinformatik 2012 - Tagungsband der MKWI 2012

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages 793-804

  Herzig, Philipp ^a   Strahringer, Susanne ^b   Ameling, Michael ^a  

^a SAP RESEARCH   (Germany)

^b DRESDEN UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BUSINESS APPLICATIONS; EMPIRICAL VALIDATION; LATENT VARIABLE; PARTIAL LEAST SQUARE (PLS); PERCEIVED EASE OF USE; TECHNOLOGY ACCEPTANCE MODEL; THEORETICAL MODELS; USER ACCEPTANCE;

APPLICATION PROGRAMS; LEAST SQUARES APPROXIMATIONS;

ENTERPRISE RESOURCE PLANNING;

EID: 84879856676     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (30)

1. Argawal, R., & Karahanna, E. (2000): Time Flies When You're Having Fun: Cognitive Absorption and Beliefs About Information Technology Usage. MIS Quarterly 24(4):665-694.
2. Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2007): The Job Demand-Resource Model: State of the Art. Journal of Managerial Psychology 22:309-328.
3. Bunchball Inc. (2010): Gamification 101: An Introduction to the Use of Game Dynamics to Influence Behavior. http://www.bunchball.com/gamification/ gamification101.pdf. Retrieved on 24.07.2011.
4. Choi, D., Kim, H., & Kim, J. (2007): ERP Training With a Web-Based Electronic Learning System: The Flow Theory Perspective. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 65:223-243.
5. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2008): Flow: The Psychology of Optimal Experience. Harper Perennial Modern Classics, New York.
6. Davis, F. D. (1989): Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology. MIS Quarterly 13:319-339.
7. Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1989): User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models. Management Science 35(8): 982-1003.
8. DeLone, W. H., & McLean, E. R. (1992): Information System Success: The Quest for the Dependent Variable. Information Systems Research 3(1):60-95.
9. DeLone, W. H., & McLean, E. R. (2003): The DeLone and McLean Model of IS Success: A Ten-Year Update. Journal of Mngt. Information Systems 19(4):9-30.
10. Demerouti, E., Bakker, A. B., Nachreiner, F., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2001): The Job Demands- Resource Model of Burnout. Journal of Applied Psychology 86:499-512.
11. Deterding, S., Sicart, M., Nacke, L., O'Hara, K., & Dixon, D. (2011, May): Gamification: Using Game Design Elements in Non-Gaming Contexts. ACM, Vancouver, Canada
12. Dromgoole, S. (2011): http://www.scribd.com/doc/13714815/Sean-Dromgoole- CEO-Some-Research-Gamevision; Retrieved on 27.07.2011.
13. Fang, X., & Zhao, F. (2010): Personality and enjoyment of computer game play. Computer in Industry 61:342-349.
14. Herzig, P. (2011): Toward a Theoretical Model for Evaluation and Explanation of ERP User Experience: Gamification versus Tradition. Research Seminar, Chair of Information Systems, esp. IS in Manufacturing and Commerce, Technische Universität Dresden
15. Hoffman, D. L., & Novak, T. P. (2009): Flow online: Lessons Learned and Future Prospects. Journal of Interactive Marketing 23(1):23-34.
16. Hsu, C.-L., & Lu, H.-P. (2003): Why Do People Play On-Line Games? An Extended TAM with Social Influences and Flow Experience. Information & Management 41:853-868.
17. McGonigal, J. (2011): Reality is Broken: Why Games Make Us Better and How They Can Change the World. New York: The Penguin Press.
18. Novak, T., Hoffmann, D., & Yung, Y. (2000): Measuring the Customer Experience in On-line Environments: A Structural Modeling Approach. Marketing Science 19(1):22-42.
19. Reeves, B., & Read, J. L. (2009): Total Engagement: Using Games and Virtual Worlds to Change the Way People Work and Businesses Compete. Boston, MA: H. B. Press.
20. Ringle, C. M., Wende, S., & Will, S. (2011): SmartPLS 2.0 (M3) Beta. Available from http://www.smartpls.de.
21. SoSciSurvey (2011): oFb - der onlineFragebogen. Available from https://www.sosci-survey.de; Retrieved on 15.05.2011.
22. Unity Technologies. (2011): Unity 3.1. http://unity3d.com/. Retrieved on 08.08.2011.
23. Venkatesh, V. (2000): Determinants of Perceived Ease of Use: Integrating Control, Intrinsic Motivation, and Emotion into the Technology Acceptance Model. Information Systems Research 11(4):342-365.
24. Venkatesh, V., & Bala, H. (2008): Technology Acceptance Model 3 and a Research Agenda on Interventions. Decision Sciences 39(2):273-315.
25. Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (2000): A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies. Mngt. Science 46(2):186-204.
26. Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003): User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View. MIS Quarterly 27(3):425-478.
27. Wang, Y. S. (2003): Assessment of Learner Satisfaction With Asynchronous Electronic Learning Systems. Information & Management 41:75-86.
28. Wang, Y.-S. (2008): Assessing E-Commerce Systems Success: A Respecification and Validation of the DeLone and McLean Model of IS Success. IS Journal 18:529-557.
29. Wixom, B. H., & Todd, P. A. (2005): A Theoretical Integration of User Satisfaction and Technology Acceptance. Information Systems Research 16(1): 85-102.
30. Wu, J., Li, P., & Rao, S. (2008): Why They Enjoy Virtual Game Worlds? An Empirical Investigation. Journal of Electronic Commerce Research 9( 3):219-230.