Failure to apply signal detection theory to the montreal battery of evaluation of amusia may misdiagnose amusia

Music Perception

Volumn 30, Issue 5, 2013, Pages 480-496

  Henry, Molly J ^a   McAuley, J Devin ^a  

^a MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Amusia; Montreal Battery of Evaluation of Amusia (MBEA); Music perception; ROC curves; Signal detection theory (SDT)

Indexed keywords

EID: 84879815236     PISSN: 07307829     EISSN: 15338312     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1525/MP.2013.30.5.480     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. ALY, M., KNIGHT, R. T., & YONELINAS, A. P. (2010). Faces are special but not too special: Spared face recognition in amnesia is based on familiarity. Neuropsychologia, 48, 3941-3948.
2. AYOTTE, J., PERETZ, I., & HYDE, K. (2002). Congenital amusia: A group study of adults afflicted with a music-specific disorder. Brain, 125, 238-251.
3. CROWE, E., & HIGGINS, E. T. (1997). Regulatory focus and strategic inclinations: Promotion and prevention in decision-making. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 69, 117-132.
4. CUDDY, L. L., BALKWILL, L. L., PERETZ, I., & HOLDEN, R. R. (2005). Musical difficulties are rare: A study of "tone deafness" among university students. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1060, 311-324.
5. DOUGLAS, K. M., & BILKEY, D. K. (2007). Amusia is associated with deficits in spatial processing. Nature Neuroscience, 10, 915-921.
6. DURLACH, N. I., & BRAIDA, L. D. (1969). Intensity perception I: Preliminary theory of intensity resolution. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 46, 372-383.
7. ERNST, M. D. (2004). Permutation methods: A basis for exact inference. Statistical Science, 19, 676-685.
8. GREEN, D. M., & SWETS, J. A. (1966). Signal detection theory and psychophysics. New York: Wiley.
9. HENRY, M. J., & MCAULEY, J. D. (2010). On the prevalence of congenital amusia. Music Perception, 27, 413-418.
10. HYDE, K. L., & PERETZ, I. (2004). Brains that are out of tune but in time. Psychological Science, 15, 356-360.
11. KUNIMOTO, C., MILLER, J., & PASHLER, H. (2001). Confidence and accuracy of near-threshold discrimination responses. Consciousness and Cognition, 10, 294-340.
12. LOUI, P., ALSOP, D., & SCHLAUG, G. (2009). Tone deafness: A new disconnection syndrome? The Journal of Neuroscience, 29, 10215-10220.
13. LOUI, P., GUENTHER, F., MATHYS, C., & SCHLAUG, G. (2008). Action-perception mismatch in tone-deafness. Current Biology, 18, 331-332.
14. MACMILLAN, N. A., & CREELMAN, C. D. (2005). Detection theory: A user's guide. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
15. MCAULEY, J. D., HENRY, M. J., & TUFT, S. (2011). Musician advantages in music perception: An issue of motivation, not just ability. Music Perception, 28, 505-518.
16. MCDONALD, C., & STEWART, L. (2008). Uses and functions of music in congenital amusia. Music Perception, 25, 345-355.
17. OMIGIE, D., & STEWART, L. (2011). Preserved statistical learning of tonal and linguistic material in congenital amusia. Frontiers in Psychology, 2, 1-11.
18. PARKS, C. M., DECARLI, C., JACOBY, L. L., & YONELINAS, A. P. (2010). Aging effects on recollection and familiarity: The role of white matter hyperintensities. Aging, Neuropsychology, Cognition, 17, 422-438.
19. PATEL, A. D. (2008). Music, language, and the brain. New York: Oxford University Press.
20. PERETZ, I., BRATTICO, E., JÄRVENPÄÄ, M., & TERVANIEMI, M. (2009). The amusic brain: In tune, out of key, and unaware. Brain, 132, 1277-1286.
21. PERETZ, I.,CHAMPOD,A.S.,&HYDE, K. L. (2003). Varieties of musical disorders: The Montreal Battery of Evaluation of Amusia. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 999, 58-75.
22. PERETZ, I., GOSSELIN, N., TILLMAN, B., CUDDY, L. L., GAGNON, B., TRIMMER, C. G. ET AL. (2008). On-line identification of congenital amusia. Music Perception, 25, 331-343.
23. RATCLIFF, R., MCKOON, G., & TINDALL, M. (1994). Experimental generality of data from recognition memory receiver-operating characteristic functions and implications for the glocal memory models. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20, 763-785.
24. ROUSSEAU, B., ROGEAUX, M., & O'MAHONEY, M. (1999). Mustard discrimination by same-different and triangle tests: Aspects of irritation, memory, and t criteria. Food Quality and Preference, 10, 173-184.
25. SNODGRASS, J. G., & CORWIN, J. (1988). Pragmatics of measuring recognition memory: Applications to dementia and amnesia. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 117, 34-50.
26. TILLMANN, B., SCHULZE, K., & FOXTON, J. (2009). Congenital amusia: A short-term memory deficit for non-verbal, but not verbal sounds. Brain and Cognition, 71, 259-264.
27. TUNNEY, R. J., & SHANKS, D. R. (2003). Subjective measures of awareness and implicit cognition. Memory and Cognition, 31, 1060-1071.
28. VANN, S. D., TSILVILIS, D., DENBY, C. E., QUAMME, J. R., YONELINAS, A. P., AGGLETON, J. P. ET AL. (2009). Impaired recollection but spared familiarity in patients with extended hippocampal system damage revealed by 3 convergent methods. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106, 5442-5447.
29. WILLIAMSON, V. J., LIU, F., PERYER, G., GRIERSON, M., & STEWART, L. (2012). Perception and action de-coupling in congenital amusia: Sensitivity to task. Neuropsychologia, 50, 172-180.
30. WILLIAMSON, V. J., MCDONALD, C., DEUTSCH, D., GRIFFITHS, T. D., & STEWART, L. (2010). Faster decline of pitch memory over time in congenital amusia. Advances in Cognitive Psychology, 6, 15-22.
31. YONELINAS, A. P. (1999). The contribution of recollection and familiarity to recognition and source-memory judgments: A formal dual-process model and an analysis of receiver operator characteristics. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 25, 1415-1434.