TEMPORAL DYNAMICS OF OUTCROSSING AND HOST MORTALITY RATES IN HOST-PATHOGEN EXPERIMENTAL COEVOLUTION

Evolution

Volumn 67, Issue 7, 2013, Pages 1860-1868

  Morran, Levi T ^a   Parrish, Raymond C ^a   Gelarden, Ian A ^a   Lively, Curtis M ^a  

^a INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Adaptation; experimental selection; mating systems; parasitism

Indexed keywords

COEVOLUTION; EXPERIMENTAL STUDY; HOST-PATHOGEN INTERACTION; MATING BEHAVIOR; MICROBIAL ACTIVITY; MORTALITY; OUTCROSSING; PATHOGEN; PERSISTENCE; POPULATION DYNAMICS;

ADAPTATION; ANIMAL; ARTICLE; CAENORHABDITIS ELEGANS; EVOLUTION; EXPERIMENTAL SELECTION; GENETICS; HOST PATHOGEN INTERACTION; MATING SYSTEMS; MICROBIOLOGY; PARASITISM; PHYSIOLOGY; SERRATIA MARCESCENS;

ADAPTATION; EXPERIMENTAL SELECTION; MATING SYSTEMS; PARASITISM;

ANIMALS; BIOLOGICAL EVOLUTION; CAENORHABDITIS ELEGANS; HOST-PATHOGEN INTERACTIONS; SERRATIA MARCESCENS;

BACTERIA (MICROORGANISMS); CAENORHABDITIS ELEGANS; SERRATIA MARCESCENS;

EID: 84879787780     PISSN: 00143820     EISSN: 15585646     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/evo.12007     Document Type: Article

References (62)

1. Ajie, B. C., S. Estes, M. Lynch, and P. C. Phillips 2005. Behavioral degradation under mutation accumulation in Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics 170:655-660.
2. Andersen, E. C., J. P. Gerke, J. A. Shapiro, J. R. Crissman, R. Ghosh, J. S. Bloom, M. A. Felix, and L. Kruglyak 2012. Chromosome-scale selective sweeps shape Caenorhabditis elegans genomic diversity. Nat. Genet. 44:285-290.
3. Anderson, J. L., L. T. Morran, and P. C. Phillips 2010. Outcrossing and the maintenance of males within C. elegans populations. J. Hered. 101 Suppl 1:S62-S74.
4. Anderson, J. L., R. M. Reynolds, L. T. Morran, J. Tolman-Thompson, and P. C. Phillips 2011. Experimental evolution reveals antagonistic pleiotropy in reproductive timing but not life span in Caenorhabditis elegans. J. Gerontol. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci. 66:1300-1308.
5. Anderson, P. 1995. Mutagenesis. Pp. 31-54 in H. Epstein, DC Shakes, ed. Caenorhabditis elegans: modern biological analysis of an organism. Academic Press, London, U. K.
6. Andolfatto, P. 2001. Adaptive hitchhiking effects on genome variability. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 11:635-641.
7. Baer, C. F., N. Phillips, D. Ostrow, A. Avalos, D. Blanton, A. Boggs, T. Keller, L. Levy, and E. Mezerhane 2006. Cumulative effects of spontaneous mutations for fitness in Caenorhabditis: role of genotype, environment and stress. Genetics 174:1387-1395.
8. Baer, C. F., F. Shaw, C. Steding, M. Baumgartner, A. Hawkins, A. Houppert, N. Mason, M. Reed, K. Simonelic, W. Woodard, et al. 2005. Comparative evolutionary genetics of spontaneous mutations affecting fitness in rhabditid nematodes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 102:5785-5790.
9. Baltrus, D., K. Guillemin, and P. Phillips 2008. Natural transformation increases the rate of adaptation in the human pathogen Helicobacter pylori. Evolution 62:39-49.
10. Barriere, A., and M. A. Felix 2005. High local genetic diversity and low outcrossing rate in Caenorhabditis elegans natural populations. Curr. Biol. 15:1176-1184.
11. Barriere, A., and M. A. Felix 2007. Temporal dynamics and linkage disequilibrium in natural Caenorhabditis elegans populations. Genetics 176:999-1011.
12. Becks, L., and A. F. Agrawal 2010. Higher rates of sex evolve in spatially heterogeneous environments. Nature 468:89-93.
13. Becks, L., and A. F. Agrawal 2012. The evolution of sex is favoured during adaptation to new environments. PLoS Biol. 10:e1001317.
14. Bell, G. 1982. The masterpiece of nature: the evolution and genetics of sexuality. University of California Press, Berkley, CA.
15. Brenner, S. 1974. The genetics of Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics 77:71-94.
16. Chandler, C. H., G. E. Chadderdon, P. C. Phillips, I. Dworkin, and F. J. Janzen 2011. Experimental evolution of the Caenorhabditis elegans sex determination pathway. Evolution 66:82-93.
17. Chasnov, J. R., and K. L. Chow 2002. Why are there males in the hermaphroditic species Caenorhabditis elegans? Genetics 160:983-994.
18. Colegrave, N. 2002. Sex releases the speed limit on evolution. Nature 420:664-666.
19. Cooper, T. F. 2007. Recombination speeds adaptation by reducing competition between beneficial mutations in populations of Escherichia coli. PLoS Biol. 5:e225.
20. Cutter, A. D. 2005. Mutation and the experimental evolution of outcrossing in Caenorhabditis elegans. J. Evol. Biol. 18:27-34.
21. Denver, D. R., K. Morris, M. Lynch, and W. K. Thomas 2004. High mutation rate and predominance of insertions in the Caenorhabditis elegans nuclear genome. Nature 430:679-682.
22. Estes, S., and M. Lynch 2003. Rapid fitness recovery in mutationally degraded lines of Caenorhabditis elegans. Evolution 57:1022-1030.
23. Estes, S., P. C. Phillips, and D. R. Denver 2011. Fitness recovery and compensatory evolution in natural mutant lines of C. elegans. Evolution 65:2335-2344.
24. Estes, S., P. C. Phillips, D. R. Denver, W. K. Thomas, and M. Lynch 2004. Mutation accumulation in populations of varying size: the distribution of mutational effects for fitness correlates in Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics 166:1269-1279.
25. Fischer, O., and P. Schmid-Hempel 2005. Selection by parasites may increase host recombination frequency. Biol. Lett. 1:193-195.
26. Gandon, S., and S. P. Otto 2007. The evolution of sex and recombination in response to abiotic or coevolutionary fluctuations in epistasis. Genetics 175:1835-1853.
27. Goddard, M. R., H. Charles, J. Godfray, and A. Burt 2005. Sex increases the efficacy of natural selection in experimental yeast populations. Nature 434:636-640.
28. Haber, M., M. Schungel, A. Putz, S. Muller, B. Hasert, and H. Schulenburg 2005. Evolutionary history of Caenorhabditis elegans inferred from microsatellites: evidence for spatial and temporal genetic differentiation and the occurrence of outbreeding. Mol. Biol. Evol. 22:160-173.
29. Hall, A. R., P. D. Scanlan, A. D. Morgan, and A. Buckling 2011. Host-parasite coevolutionary arms races give way to fluctuating selection. Ecol. Lett. 14:635-642.
30. Hamilton, W. D. 1980. Sex versus non-sex versus parasite. Oikos 35:282-290.
31. Jaenike, J. 1978. An hypothesis to account for the maintenance of sex within populations. Evol. Theory 3:191-194.
32. Jokela, J., M. F. Dybdahl, and C. M. Lively 2009. The maintenance of sex, clonal dynamics, and host-parasite coevolution in a mixed population of sexual and asexual snails. Am. Nat. 174 Suppl 1:S43-S53.
33. Katju, V., E. M. LaBeau, K. J. Lipinski, and U. Bergthorsson 2008. Sex change by gene conversion in a Caenorhabditis elegans fog-2 mutant. Genetics 180:669-672.
34. Kerstes, N. A. G., C. Berenos, P. Schmid-Hempel, and K. M. Wegner 2012. Antagonistic experimental coevolution with a parasite increases host recombination frequency. BMC Evol. Biol. 12:18. doi:10.1186/1471-2148-12-18.
35. King, K. C., L. F. Delph, J. Jokela, and C. M. Lively 2009. The geographic mosaic of sex and the Red Queen. Curr. Biol. 19:1438-1441.
36. Lande, R., and D. W. Schemske 1985. The evolution of self-fertilization and inbreeding depression in plants. 1. Genetic models. Evolution 39:24-40.
37. Lindman, H. R. 1974. Analysis of variance in complex experimental designs. W.H. Freeman & Co., San Francisco, CA.
38. Lloyd, D. G. 1980. Benefits and handicaps of sexual reproduction. Evol. Biol. 13:69-106.
39. Lopes, P. C., E. Sucena, M. E. Santos, and S. Magalhaes 2008. Rapid experimental evolution of pesticide resistance in C. elegans entails no costs and affects the mating system. PLoS ONE 3:e3741.
40. Manoel, D., S. Carvalho, P. C. Phillips, and H. Teotonio 2007. Selection against males in Caenorhabditis elegans under two mutational treatments. Proc. R. Soc. B 274:417-424.
41. Maynard Smith, J. 1978. The evolution of sex. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, U. K.
42. Morran, L. T., A. H. Ohdera, and P. C. Phillips 2010. Purging deleterious mutations under self-fertilization: paradoxical recovery in fitness with increasing mutation rate in Caenorhabditis elegans. PLoS One 5:e14473.
43. Morran, L. T., M. D. Parmenter, and P. C. Phillips 2009. Mutation load and rapid adaptation favor outcrossing over self-fertilization. Nature 462:350-352.
44. Morran, L. T., O. G. Schmidt, I. A. Gelarden, R. C. Parrish, II, and C. M. Lively 2011. Running with the Red Queen: host-parasite coevolution selects for biparental sex. Science 333:216-218.
45. Murray, R. L., and A. D. Cutter 2011. Experimental evolution of sperm count in protandrous self-fertilizing hermaphrodites. J. Exp. Biol. 214:1740-1747.
46. Nordborg, M. 1997. Structured coalescent processes on different time scales. Genetics 146:1501-1514.
47. Ostrow, D., N. Phillips, A. Avalos, D. Blanton, A. Boggs, T. Keller, L. Levy, J. Rosenbloom, and C. F. Baer 2007. Mutational bias for body size in Rhabditid nematodes. Genetics 176:1653-1661.
48. Peters, A. D., and C. M. Lively 1999. The Red Queen and fluctuating epistasis: a population genetic analysis of antagonistic coevolution. Am. Nat. 154:393-405.
49. Rockman, M. V., and L. Kruglyak 2009. Recombinational landscape and population genomics of Caenorhabditis elegans. PLoS Genet. 5:e1000419.
50. Schedl, T., and J. Kimble 1988. fog-2, a germ-line-specific sex determination gene required for hermaphrodite spermatogenesis in Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics 119:43-61.
51. Schulenburg, H., and J. J. Ewbank 2004. Diversity and specificity in the interaction between Caenorhabditis elegans and the pathogen Serratia marcescens. BMC Evol. Biol. 4:49. doi:10.1186/1471-2148-4-49.
52. Schulte, R. D., C. Makus, B. Hasert, N. K. Michiels, and H. Schulenburg 2010. Multiple reciprocal adaptations and rapid genetic change upon experimental coevolution of an animal host and its microbial parasite. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 107:7359-7364.
53. Sivasundar, A., and J. Hey 2005. Sampling from natural populations with RNAi reveals high outcrossing and population structure in Caenorhabditis elegans. Curr. Biol. 15:1598-1602.
54. Stebbins, G. L. 1957. Self-fertilization and population variation in higher plants. Am. Nat. 91:337-354.
55. Stewart, A. D., and P. C. Phillips 2002. Selection and maintenance of androdioecy in Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics 160:975-982.
56. Teotonio, H., S. Carvalho, D. Manoel, M. Roque, and I. M. Chelo 2012. Evolution of outcrossing in experimental populations of Caenorhabditis elegans. PLoS One 7:e35811.
57. Van Valen, L. 1973. A new evolutionary law. Evol. Theory 1:1-30.
58. Vassilieva, L. L., A. M. Hook, and M. Lynch 2000. The fitness effects of spontaneous mutations in Caenorhabditis elegans. Evolution 54:1234-1246.
59. Vassilieva, L. L., and M. Lynch 1999. The rate of spontaneous mutation for life-history traits in Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics 151:119-129.
60. Wegewitz, V., H. Schulenburg, and A. Streit 2008. Experimental insight into the proximate causes of male persistence variation among two strains of the androdioecious Caenorhabditis elegans (Nematoda). BMC Ecol. 8:12. doi:10.1186/1472-6785-8-12.
61. Wegewitz, V., H. Schulenburg, and A. Streit 2009. Do males facilitate the spread of novel phenotypes within populations of the androdioecious nematode Caenorhabditis elegans? J. Nematol. 41:247-254.
62. Woolhouse, M. E., J. P. Webster, E. Domingo, B. Charlesworth, and B. R. Levin 2002. Biological and biomedical implications of the co-evolution of pathogens and their hosts. Nat. Genet. 32:569-577.